Ethanol in crosshairs as tax deadline nears

Dec 03, 2010 by Rob Lever
An Iowa farmer plants corn to be used for ethanol fuel in a field on a farm in 2007. Ethanol, once seen as an answer to US energy problems, is seeing political support waning as a deadline nears for Congress to decide on extending tax subsidies for the widely used biofuel.

Ethanol, once seen as an answer to US energy problems, is seeing political support waning as a deadline nears for Congress to decide on extending tax subsidies for the widely used biofuel.

US lawmakers have until December 31 to prolong the subsidy, which costs the US government an estimated six billion dollars a year, but the earlier broad support for the fuel from farmers and environmentalists appears to be wavering.

Critics say , made mainly from corn in the United States, has diverted too much grain from food to fuel, and has done little to ease .

Now, a coalition Tea Party activists and a range of environmental and community groups is urging lawmakers to scrap the subsidy.

Letting the subsidies expire "will help control deficit spending without in any way hindering the development of advanced biofuels, which can help us meet our , environmental and food security needs in a fiscally responsible manner," said the coalition, which includes groups as diverse as the American Conservative Union, Center for Food Safety and Friends of the Earth.

A group of 17 senators meanwhile has gone a step further in a letter calling not only for the end of the 45-cent per gallon ethanol credit, but also the 54-cent tariff on ethanol imports -- a measure that has drawn the ire of Brazil, a major producer of sugar cane ethanol.

Corn sprouts from the ground on a farm near Rochelle, Illinois in 2007. US lawmakers have until December 31 to prolong an ethanol subsidy, which costs the US government an estimated six billion dollars a year, but the earlier broad support for the fuel from farmers and environmentalists appears to be wavering.

"These provisions are fiscally irresponsible and environmentally unwise, and their extension would make our country more dependent on foreign oil," said the senators led by Democrat Dianne Feinstein of California and Republican Jon Kyl of Arizona.

US Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack has urged Congress to extend the domestic subsidies and has said the tariffs should remain to give breathing room to a new industry.

"The bottom line is that this industry needs more time to mature and more investment to grow," he said.

"In order to meet the 36 billion gallon goal (for ), we will need to work harder and faster. Now, incentives have helped build the industry and for the time being, incentives will need to continue," he added.

"At the same time, we need to begin to think about reforms to the ethanol credit program to make it more efficient and effective at addressing the full range of challenges we face in meeting our goals for traditional and next generation biofuels."

But ethanol has lost a key supporter in former vice president Al Gore, a Nobel Peace Prize laureate for his work on global warming. Gore told an energy conference in Greece recently that his earlier support for ethanol subsidies was a mistake, according to media reports.

"It is not a good policy to have these massive subsidies for first generation ethanol," Gore was quoted as saying.

"First generation ethanol I think was a mistake. The energy conversion ratios are at best very small," he said.

"One of the reasons I made that mistake is that I paid particular attention to the farmers in my home state of Tennessee, and I had a certain fondness for the farmers in the state of Iowa because I was about to run for president," Gore admitted.

Still, a large number of farm-belt lawmakers are working to extend the tax breaks for ethanol.

Senator Charles Grassley of Iowa led a petition by 15 lawmakers calling for the extension of the subsidies and tariffs, arguing that "ethanol offers the most effective alternative to foreign oil and supports hundreds of thousands of jobs in the United States."

"Domestically produced ethanol displaces millions of barrels of imported oil every year from Saudi Arabia, Venezuela and Nigeria and now accounts for almost 10 percent of the US fuel supply," said a statement from Grassley and colleagues.

Joel Velasco, representative in North America for the Brazilian sugarcane industry association, said ending the subsidy would likely reduce prices for American consumers.

"The bottom line is that competition works. The market for corn-based ethanol will still grow," Velasco said.

Brazil ended government subsidies for ethanol more than a decade ago and eliminated its ethanol tariff early this year. It is time for America to do the same. As the world's top producers of ethanol, the United States and Brazil should lead by example in creating a free market for clean, renewable energy."

Explore further: New solar power material converts 90 percent of captured light into heat

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

The future of biofuels is not in corn

Jul 18, 2007

The future of biofuels is not in corn, says a new report released today by Food & Water Watch, the Network for New Energy Choices, and the Vermont Law School Institute for Energy and the Environment. The corn ethanol refinery ...

Ethanol production said increasing erosion

Jul 06, 2005

Large-scale farming of sugar cane and corn for ethanol fuel is increasing erosion and reducing biodiversity, Washington State University researchers say.

Fuel ethanol cannot alleviate US dependence on petroleum

Jul 01, 2005

A new study of the carbon dioxide emissions, cropland area requirements, and other environmental consequences of growing corn and sugarcane to produce fuel ethanol indicates that the "direct and indirect environmental impacts ...

Ethanol's agricultural impact is mixed

Oct 19, 2005

Purdue University economists say converting more corn into ethanol might profit many interests, but not all in the agriculture industry would benefit.

Study: US biofuels policies flawed

Jan 06, 2010

The United States needs to fundamentally rethink its policy of promoting ethanol to diversify its energy sources and increase energy security, according to a new policy paper by Rice University's Baker Institute for Public ...

Recommended for you

Preparing for a zero-emission urban bus system

11 hours ago

In order to create a competitive and sustainable transport system, the EU must look to alternative fuels to replace or complement petrol and diesel. Not only will this reduce transport emissions but it will ...

Exploring the value of 'Energy Star' homes

11 hours ago

The numbers in neat columns tell—column by column, page by page—a story spread out across Carmen Carrión-Flores' desk at Binghamton University. It's a great story, she says; she just doesn't know how ...

Toward a networked energy future

Oct 29, 2014

February 1, 2050, is a good day for German electricity consumers. The breeze off the north coast is blowing so strongly that offshore wind farms and the wind turbines on land are running non-stop. Since it's ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Shootist
5 / 5 (1) Dec 04, 2010
Ethanol in crosshairs as tax deadline nears


Good. Besides being wasteful, turning food to fuel is a crime against the poor and hungry.
Justsayin
not rated yet Dec 06, 2010
It would be nice if the 350 billion in waste identified by senator Tom Coburn years ago would be in the cross hairs too.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.