Disney's 'Tron' movie reverse-ages Jeff Bridges

Dec 07, 2010 By RYAN NAKASHIMA , Associated Press
In this undated photo released by Disney Enterprises, Inc. showing actor Jeff Bridges shown in "Tron: Legacy." Bridges will play himself, at his natural age, and a computerized avatar called “Clu,” who hasn’t aged since around the time he was first created for the first “Tron” movie, in 1982. Clu bears Bridges’ face, altered to make him about 35 years old, but it’s grafted onto the body of a younger actor. (AP Photo/Disney Enterprises Inc.) NO SALES

(AP) -- Hollywood has famously had better luck using makeup to make young actors look old - like Russell Crowe in "A Beautiful Mind" - than making old actors look young. But the ability to manipulate images digitally could prove to be a fountain of youth for actors getting long in the tooth.

In "Tron: Legacy," which opens Dec. 17, 61-year-old actor Jeff Bridges will play Kevin Flynn, at his natural age, and a computerized avatar called "Clu," who hasn't aged since around the time he was first created in the original "Tron" in 1982.

Clu bears Bridges' face, altered to make him about 35 years old, but it's grafted onto a younger actor's body.

While it may be eerie for audiences to see a new performance from a younger-looking Bridges, it was no less strange for the actor himself.

"It's bizarre. It's great news for me, because now it means I can play myself at any age," Bridges said.

There have been digitally created faces before, even on fully animated bodies. Think Gollum in "The Lord of the Rings" or Dobby from "Harry Potter."

But no movie yet has done what The Walt Disney Co.'s "Tron: Legacy" attempts - putting an actor's rejuvenated face on a younger body, and in 3-D no less. Inevitably, the 61-year-old-turned-35-year-old face will be compared to Bridges when he was actually 35.

"With Jeff, we can go rent 'Against All Odds' or 'The Fabulous Baker Boys' or 'Starman,'" visual effects supervisor Eric Barba said. "All this makes it incredibly difficult."

The filmmakers did not want Bridges' Clu looking precisely as he did in 1982. The idea was that some time had elapsed, and Clu was meant to look like Bridges in "Against All Odds," which came out two years after the original "Tron."

"In our mythology, Clu was created after the events of the first film," director Joseph Kosinski said. "This is Clu 2."

Computers have already been used to roll back the years. Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellen were made a couple decades younger in scenes from "X-Men: The Last Stand" from 2006.

Head alterations have happened, too. Helena Bonham Carter had an oversized cranium as the Red Queen in this year's "Alice in Wonderland," and the late Oliver Reed's face was put on a body double after he died during the shooting of "Gladiator," released in 2000.

But the triple-toe-loop of complexity in "Tron: Legacy" is a notch tougher than all that.

It also goes beyond the techniques that Barba and "Tron" animation supervisor Steve Preeg pioneered on Brad Pitt in the 2008 movie "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button," for which they shared an Oscar for visual effects. Pitt was digitally remade to look older, but he was never re-engineered to appear as the younger actor who has been seen by countless millions on celluloid.

By contrast, "we know what Jeff looks like and how he acted," Barba said. "It just means that people's perceptions will vary across the board."

In "Tron: Legacy," Clu was created to help Bridges' character and the other program, Tron, build a perfect virtual world, but Clu turns evil with his own dark notions of building a virtual society.

To make Clu, filmmakers made a silicon mold of Bridges' face and painted it like real flesh. They took multiple photos, put them into a computer and gave him a "digital face lift" that took out wrinkles, tightened the skin and shrunk down his nose and ears.

He then performed a series of facial movements, such as raising his outer left eyebrow or lifting his cheek. Those were recorded by camera and computerized in 3-D.

Finally, when Bridges acted in scenes as Clu, he wore a helmet with four tiny cameras pointed at his face. Dozens of dots on his face acted as reference points for the computer.

"Sometimes I could be in my street clothes and just have this weird helmet on," Bridges said.

The captured expressions are replicated on his younger-looking self. Actor John Reardon mimicked Bridges in later takes and had his face swapped out later.

Making sure Bridges' computerized head matched up with Reardon's body took artistry as well as high-tech. Preeg said filmmakers took more time looking at 160 Clu shots than they did at all the other 1,400 shots in the movie.

And who knows? Their hard work could help other aging reprise roles they never had in the first place.

"I think this technology opens up really interesting opportunities for actors," Kosinski said.

Explore further: For Google's self-driving cars, learning to deal with the bizarre is essential

3 /5 (4 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Branson launches glossy iPad magazine, 'Project'

Nov 30, 2010

British tycoon Richard Branson launched a glossy magazine for the iPad on Tuesday, getting the jump on News Corp.'s Rupert Murdoch in the race to develop publications for the hot Apple device.

Terrorist-resistant bridge is developed

Jan 26, 2006

A University at Buffalo engineer has developed a "multi-hazard" design that he said makes bridges more resistant to terrorist attacks and earthquakes.

Using wireless sensors to monitor bridge safety

Feb 23, 2009

University of Texas (UT) professor, Dean Neikirk, will be field-testing a new bridge monitoring system within the year. The project is a collaboration between industry, government, and academia that will provide ...

Picking up bad vibes to gauge bridge health

May 02, 2007

By monitoring changes in vibrations of bridges it is possible to identify hidden cracks and fractures, according to a Queensland University of Technology researcher.

Oscar Worthy Science And Engineering

Feb 18, 2010

When audiences watch a movie, they know that what they are seeing is an illusion -- and making the images appear as real as possible can be a major undertaking for any filmmaking team.

Recommended for you

Bluetooth may be the key to your future smart home

Nov 25, 2014

If you've ever considered trying to turn your house into a smart home, you've likely found the prospect expensive or technologically intimidating. That situation could soon change, thanks in part to an old ...

Self-driving cars could be the answer to congested roads

Nov 24, 2014

If cars with drivers still suffer under gridlock conditions on roads, how will driverless cars fare any better? With greater computerisation and network awareness, driverless cars may be the answer to growing ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Raveon
not rated yet Dec 07, 2010
Just the first step in the evolution of movies when actors aren't needed at all, just computers and animators. This means there is hope for new Clint Eastwood westerns someday, all we'll need is a new Sergio Leone.
Aliensarethere
not rated yet Dec 07, 2010
I think they are wrong about Benjamin Button. Brad Pitt was made younger there.
jamey
4.5 / 5 (2) Dec 07, 2010
I rather fear this digital actor business - as George Lucas is already calling for resurrecting dead actors into new movies. But what if those movies are movies the original actor would have refused to play in? Marie Osmond in a hard-core porn? (I know she's not dead - yet) Charlton Heston in a role supporting gun control? Even ads for products the actor/actress would refuse to sell - noted vegetarians/vegans selling "Pork, the other white meat"?
LariAnn
3 / 5 (2) Dec 07, 2010
@jamey - your question is part of what will have to be worked out in the world of digital actors/actresses. Perhaps the future will have "actors" licensing their visage for use in whatever genre and subjects of movies are specified in their contracts. At some point, a sufficiently advanced digital character synthesizer will eliminate even the need to license visages. At that point, actors and actresses will be all-digital and not copied from any person, living or dead. In this future, the synthesized actors may be more true to the characters they are playing (i.e. the synthesized Napoleon Bonaparte character would look much like the real Napoleon did, not like just an actor playing him!). Using the synthesizer, the producer/directors could craft the exact actor look desired without lengthy and expensive casting calls.
Raveon
not rated yet Dec 08, 2010
Their voice and image will either be controlled by themselves, their studio or their family, just like literary works or it will become public domain. They put their image and voice out for public consumption to begin with, they're actors.
jamey
not rated yet Dec 08, 2010
@Raveon - They put their voice and image out for public consumption in certain contracted ways. This does not mean others then have the right to stretch those ways to just do whatever they want.

It's sort of like the thing businesses have of collecting personal data, and then turning around and selling it, as if it's solely their data. The data is given for a limited purpose, not for general dissemination. We should have stopped this a long time ago.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.