Death risk dependent on dialysis center choice

Dec 09, 2010 By Carl Sherman

If you need dialysis for advanced kidney disease, where you get it could make a big difference. A large study found that patients in certain large chain facilities are significantly more likely to die than those treated elsewhere. Mortality was also higher in for-profit than non-profit dialysis centers.

“The differences were not minor,” said Yi Zhang, Ph.D., lead study author. “We need to find out what caused them.”

Zhang is a senior research associate at Medical Technology and Practice Patterns Institute in Bethesda, Md. Her study appears online in the journal Health Services Research.

The researchers analyzed data involving 34,914 Medicare patients treated in 3,601 non-hospital dialysis centers in 2004. They compared statistics for each of five chains, and for non-chain for-profit and nonprofit facilities.

After adjusting for patient factors that might affect , such as age and concurrent diseases, the researchers found that the risk of death over an 18-month to 30-month period was 19 percent and 24 percent higher for patients of the two largest chains – both of which were for-profit – than for patients of a medium-size nonprofit chain.

Overall, patients were 13 percent more likely to die if they attended for-profit rather than non-profit facilities.

These findings are particularly meaningful in light of ongoing trends toward consolidation, the authors wrote: the two largest chains now treat nearly 60 percent of all dialysis patients.

The study “raises questions instead of giving definitive answers,” Zhang said. “Mortality rates among dialysis patients have improved, but are still unacceptably high. Finding a way to improve survival is an important public health issue."

Differences between facilities, including such staffing patterns as numbers of physicians and the ratio of registered nurses to technicians, “need to be examined in future studies,” she said.

The findings of this study “may be alarming for some patients who receive their care in for-profit chains, but it certainly doesn’t mean for-profits are bad or should close up shop,” said Brennan Spiegel, M.D., associate professor of medicine at West Los Angeles VA Medical Center. “Ultimately, consumers are cared for by individual people, not by an organization, and I know that many units in for-profit chains are doing great.”

The study’s “top-down” overview of groups of facilities points to the need to examine in detail patient, staff and management characteristics that might explain mortality differences between units in a single organization as well as between organizations, he said.

“We’re learning about these big communities from the view at 30,000 feet. Now we have to go down to ground level, walk around the blocks, and visit the houses,” Spiegel said.

Explore further: New rule proposes insurance program integrity guidelines

More information: Zhang Y, Cotter DJ, Thamer M. The effect of dialysis chains on mortality among patients receiving hemodialysis. Health Services Research online, 2010.

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Benefits of more frequent dialysis shown in new study

Nov 22, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- More frequent dialysis — six times a week versus the conventional three times a week — results in improved heart structure and self-reported physical health for patients with kidney failure, according ...

Why do some dialysis centers have higher survival rates?

Sep 30, 2010

Characteristics such as patient engagement, physician communication, and staff coordination may help to explain why some dialysis centers achieve higher patient survival rates than others, according to a study appearing in ...

Study finds sick kids have fewer friends

Dec 07, 2010

A new study reveals that sick teens are more isolated than other kids, but they do not necessarily realize it and often think their friendships are stronger than they actually are.

Pain is common in the last two years of life, study finds

Nov 02, 2010

In the first study to look at the prevalence of pain experienced among older people during the last two years of life, researchers at the San Francisco VA Medical Center found that 46 percent of study participants suffered ...

Recommended for you

EHR implementation first step toward quality improvement

7 hours ago

(HealthDay)—Implementation of electronic health records (EHRs) is a first step toward quality improvement and should be accompanied by use of new payment models to allow physicians to see a return on their ...

Why are some college students more likely to 'hook up'?

7 hours ago

Casual, no-strings sexual encounters are increasingly common on college campuses, but are some students more likely than others to "hook up"? A new study by researchers with The Miriam Hospital's Centers for Behavioral and ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

gwrede
3 / 5 (2) Dec 09, 2010
A non-profit site is there for the patients. A for-profit site is there for profit. This attitude difference also precipitates through the staff.

When there is no shortage of customers, and customer turn-around is high (more obese people every year, many dropping dead anyhow), profit is maximised and quality of care is lowered as low as you can get away with.

Treating more patients per dialysis station per day, using cheaper chemicals, staff, equipment, not caring about employee fatigue or attitudes, keeping maintenance and cleaning breaks to a minimum, staff get paid per patient, not per hour, having as many dialysis stations per nurse as she possibly can bear, etc. etc.

The profit goes to the fat man with a cigar, and society pays all the collateral costs. Is this what we really want????
KwasniczJ
5 / 5 (1) Dec 09, 2010
The profit goes to the fat man with a cigar, and society pays all the collateral costs. Is this what we really want????
I presume, the (lack of) public feedback is important here - not the socialistic/free market way of organization. If all dialysis centers would have mortality data exposed on their doors by law, you would see, the profit centers would do their job better. The lack of public feedback is, what brought the western capitalism into financial crisis.

More news stories