Study: Couples who delay having sex get benefits later

Dec 22, 2010

While there are still couples who wait for a deep level of commitment before having sex, today it's far more common for two people to explore their sexual compatibility before making long-term plans together.

So does either method lead to better marriages?

A new study in the American Psychological Association's Journal of sides with a delayed approach.

The study involves 2,035 married individuals who participated in a popular online marital assessment called "RELATE." From the assessment's database, researchers selected a sample designed to match the of the married American population. The extensive questionnaire includes the question "When did you become sexual in this relationship?"

A showed the following benefits enjoyed by couples who waited until compared to those who started having sex in the early part of their relationship:

  • Relationship stability was rated 22 percent higher
  • was rated 20 percent higher
  • Sexual quality of the relationship was rated 15 percent better
  • Communication was rated 12 percent better
For couples in between – those that became sexually involved later in the relationship but prior to marriage – the benefits were about half as strong.

"Most research on the topic is focused on individuals' experiences and not the timing within a relationship," said lead study author Dean Busby, a professor in Brigham Young University's School of Family Life.

"There's more to a relationship than sex, but we did find that those who waited longer were happier with the sexual aspect of their relationship," Busby added. "I think it's because they've learned to talk and have the skills to work with issues that come up."

Sociologist Mark Regnerus of the University of Texas at Austin, who was not involved with this research, read the study and shared his take on the findings.

"Couples who hit the honeymoon too early – that is, prioritize sex promptly at the outset of a relationship – often find their relationships underdeveloped when it comes to the qualities that make relationships stable and spouses reliable and trustworthy," said Regnerus, author of Premarital in America, a book forthcoming from Oxford University Press.

Because religious belief often plays a role for couples who choose to wait, Busby and his co-authors controlled for the influence of religious involvement in their analysis.

"Regardless of religiosity, waiting helps the relationship form better communication processes, and these help improve long-term stability and relationship satisfaction," Busby said.

Explore further: The strangely familiar browsing habits of 14th-century readers

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Recommended for you

New study offers insight into how to best manage workaholics

May 22, 2013

(Phys.org) —Workaholics tend to live in extremes, with great job satisfaction and creativity on the one hand and high levels of frustration and exhaustion on the other hand. Now, a new Florida State University study offers ...

The tea party and the politics of paranoia

May 22, 2013

Members of tea party claim the movement springs from and promotes basic American conservative principles such as limited government and fiscal responsibility.

The new retirement: No retirement?

May 22, 2013

For growing numbers of Americans, the new retirement may really mean no retirement. That's the conclusion of an article in the current issue of the ISR Sampler, the annual magazine of the University of Michigan Institute ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

TopherTO
5 / 5 (1) Dec 22, 2010
Reminds me of the Eddie Murphy joke from Raw. When you're starving and someone finally throws you a cracker, you can't help but say "that ain't no regular cracker, what is that saltine?"
denijane
not rated yet Jan 15, 2011
I don't know how exactly is in USA, but in Europe, marriage is some form of an archaism by now. True, some people will disagree but the statistics speak of itself.
So I don't get how you can tell people they should wait with sex until they marry, when they don't intend to marry at all.
And also, by making such statement, you once again put too big importance on sex. When the results maybe should be read in the other way - people who waited with sex, are more likely to be more interested in talking and romantics and understanding the other partner - thus their relationship will be more stable. Which makes perfect sense with or without marriage.

More news stories

Submerged structure stumps Israeli archaeologists

The massive circular structure appears to be an archaeologists dream: a recently discovered antiquity that could reveal secrets of ancient life in the Middle East and is just waiting to be excavated.

Mais non! French universities may teach in English

In France, there's a brewing debate over whether to speak anglais in universite. The National Assembly on Wednesday was taking up an education reform bill that would allow public universities to hold some courses—like science ...

Chemists find new compounds to curb staph infection

(Phys.org) —In an age when microbial pathogens are growing increasingly resistant to the conventional antibiotics used to tamp down infection, a team of Wisconsin scientists has synthesized a potent new ...