Commercial rocket engine testing moves forward

Dec 20, 2010 By J.D. Harrington and Rebecca Strecker

NASA conducted a test fire Friday of the liquid-fuel AJ26 engine that will power the first stage of Orbital Sciences Corp.'s Taurus II space launch vehicle. The test at the agency's Stennis Space Center in Mississippi supports NASA's Commercial Transportation Services partnerships to enable commercial cargo flights to the International Space Station.

Orbital's Taurus II uses a pair AJ26 rocket engines built by Aerojet to provide first stage propulsion. Friday's test on the Stennis' E-1 test stand involved a team of Orbital, Aerojet, and Stennis engineers, with Stennis employees serving as test conductors.

"Once again, the Orbital and Aerojet team have achieved a major milestone with the AJ26 engine," said Doug Cooke, associate administrator for the Exploration Systems Mission Directorate at NASA Headquarters in Washington. "This success moves Orbital closer to its goal of providing NASA with commercial space transportation services to the space station."

The 55-second firing was the second in a series of verification tests being conducted at the south Mississippi facility. A third hot-fire test also is planned to verify tuning of engine control valves.

"This second test of the AJ26 engine not only moves Orbital's commercial space transport plans a step ahead, but also demonstrates again the quality and versatility of Stennis facilities and the expertise of our test and support team," Stennis Director Patrick Scheuermann said.

The AJ26 is designed to power the Taurus II space vehicle on flights to low Earth orbit. NASA's partnership with Orbital was formed under the agency's Commercial Orbital Transportation Services joint research and development project. The company is under contract with NASA to provide eight cargo missions to the space station through 2015.

Explore further: Radiation monitors tested on space station to fly on Orion

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Era Ends for Space Shuttle Main Engine Test Program

Jul 31, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- With 520 seconds of shake, rattle and roar on July 29, NASA's John C. Stennis Space Center marked the end of an era for testing the space shuttle main engines that have powered the nation's ...

From Shuttle to Orion

Oct 02, 2006

NASA is marking a historic moment in the life of the nation's largest rocket engine test complex. The Stennis Space Center conducted the final space shuttle main engine test on its A-1 Test Stand on Friday, ...

Recommended for you

Astronauts to get 'ISSpresso' coffee machine

10 hours ago

Ristretto or lungo? Not a question astronauts on the International Space Station normally have to contemplate, but that is about to change thanks to a new zero-gravity coffee machine being delivered this weekend.

What is the difference between asteroids and comets?

13 hours ago

Asteroids and comets have a few things in common. They are both celestial bodies orbiting our Sun, and they both can have unusual orbits, sometimes straying close to Earth or the other planets. They are both ...

Second time through, Mars rover examines chosen rocks

16 hours ago

(Phys.org) —NASA's Curiosity Mars rover has completed a reconnaissance "walkabout" of the first outcrop it reached at the base of the mission's destination mountain and has begun a second pass examining ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

that_guy
5 / 5 (1) Dec 20, 2010
A new rocket engine was tested for orbital science. woohoo.

Other than the fact that this engine is being created to power a new rocket, is there any benefit to developing this engine, as opposed to other engines already out there?
dogma
5 / 5 (1) Dec 20, 2010
Was wondering the same myself. But then NASA couldn't put all it's eggs in Space-X's basket, could they?
rwinners
not rated yet Dec 20, 2010
This article begs questions such as the one above. This new engine appears to be liquid fueled. Why? What is it's output? How does it compare on a thrust/weight basis with established engines? The burn time seemed short. Was this just because the burn was a test?
Perhaps a longer article, or some links would be in order.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.