Apple, Steve Jobs hit new heights in 2010
December 26, 2010 by Veronique Dupont
Apple dethroned Microsoft as the world's most valuable technology company in 2010 as its co-founder Steve Jobs soared to new heights with the touchscreen iPad tablet computer and the latest iPhone.
Apple dethroned Microsoft as the world's most valuable technology company in 2010 as its co-founder Steve Jobs soared to new heights with the touchscreen iPad tablet computer and the latest iPhone.
Britain's Financial Times last week named Jobs its "Person of the Year" and even US President Barack Obama joined in the plaudits to the 55-year-old chief executive of the Cupertino, California-based gadget-maker.
Jobs' appearance on a San Francisco stage in January to unveil the iPad capped what the FT called "the most remarkable comeback in modern business history."
"It wasn't simply a matter of the illness that had sidelined him for half the year before, leaving him severely emaciated and eventually requiring a liver transplant," the newspaper said.
"Little more than a decade earlier, both Mr. Jobs' career and Apple, the company he had co-founded, were widely considered washed up, their relevance to the future of technology written off," it said.
Obama, at a White House news conference on Wednesday, held up Jobs as an example of the virtues of the "free market."
"We celebrate somebody like a Steve Jobs, who has created two or three different revolutionary products," Obama said. "We expect that person to be rich, and that's a good thing."
Apple CEO Steve Jobs (R) looks at a display of the new MacBook Air at the company's headquarters in Cupertino, California. Britain's Financial Times last week named Jobs its "Person of the Year".
The iPad hit stores in the United States in April and Apple reported sales at the end of September of more than eight million of the devices that the FT said offer a glimpse into a world without a computer mouse or Windows.Other technology firms are trying to match Apple's success with tablets of their own, including South Korea's Samsung, Canada's Research In Motion, maker of the Blackberry, and US computer giants Hewlett-Packard and Dell.
But none has yet to prove capable of preventing Apple from establishing the same dominance over the tablet computer market that it exercises over the MP3 music player scene with the ubiquitous iPod, introduced in 2001.
Goldman Sachs said it expects Apple to ship 37.2 million iPads in 2011 -- "which could potentially make Apple one of the largest vendors in the global personal computing market" -- tablets plus personal computers.
The iPad wasn't Apple's only hit product in 2010.
The iPhone 4, the latest version of the touchscreen smartphone introduced by Apple in 2007, sold 14.1 million units in the quarter which ended in September, up 91 percent over the same quarter a year earlier.
Even Apple TV, a product Jobs once dismissed as a "hobby," is notching up strong sales. Apple said last week that sales of the latest model of the set-top box that can stream content from the Web had topped one million units.
The rare blemishes on Apple's record in 2010 were its continuing inability to come out with a promised white model of the iPhone 4 and complaints of lost reception due to the radical antenna design on the device.
Apple shares, worth 10 dollars at the end of 2003, gained around 60 percent this year, closing at more than 320 dollars on Wall Street on Thursday.
In May, Apple surpassed Microsoft as the largest US technology company in terms of market value. The only companies with larger market capitalization than Apple's nearly 300 billion dollars are ExxonMobil and Petrochina.
Meeschaert New York analyst Gregori Volokhine described Apple's rise as "absolutely extraordinary" and said "every analyst has an even higher target price for next year, between 360 dollars and 430 dollars."
"Apple's more than just a company," Volokhine told AFP. "It's become a cultural phenomenon. The hard part now will be not to disappoint."
(c) 2010 AFP
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
28 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
41 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
30 comments
-
Scotland passes turbine test to harness tidal power,
40 comments
-
length of wire in a coil of known dimensions?
15 hours ago
-
India Engineering Powerhouse
23 hours ago
-
electromagnet core dereference between hard and soft iron
May 25, 2012
-
Measuring water pressure in an open tank
May 24, 2012
-
Question from a non-engineer: Pulley Systems
May 24, 2012
-
Formula to calculate psi required to deliver gpm through nozzel
May 23, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Engineering
More news stories
Yahoo kills 'Livestand' just 6 months after debut
(AP) -- Yahoo is killing a tablet magazine called Livestand just six months its debut on the iPad.
11 hours ago |
not rated yet |
1
Computers excel at identifying smiles of frustration (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in the US have trained computers to recognize smiles, and they have turned out to be more adept at recognizing smiles of frustration ...
Yahoo! ditches digital newsstand for iPads
Yahoo! shuttered its fledgling digital newsstand for iPads on Friday in what it said was the start of a product purge intended to make the floundering Internet pioneer more nimble.
12 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
Facebook IPO debacle raises investor dander
The spate of complaints and investigations over the Facebook stock offering suggests big institutions had an edge over small investors, raising questions about the process.
13 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
Apple CEO Cook gives up $75M in stock dividends
(AP) -- Apple CEO Tim Cook is giving up $75 million in dividends on restricted stock that the company is awarding to all of its employees.
16 hours ago |
1.8 / 5 (4) |
2
Of mice and mental models: Neuroscientific implications of risk-optimized behavior in the mouse
(Medical Xpress) -- Regardless of an organism’s biological complexity, every encephalized animal continuously makes under-informed behavioral choices that can have serious consequences. Despite its ubiquity, ...
Dragon arrives at space station in historic 1st (Update 2)
The privately bankrolled Dragon capsule made a historic arrival at the International Space Station on Friday, triumphantly captured by astronauts wielding a giant robot arm.
Landmark calculation clears the way to answering how matter is formed
(Phys.org) -- An international collaboration of scientists, including Thomas Blum, associate professor of physics, is reporting in landmark detail the decay process of a subatomic particle called a kaon ...
High-speed method to aid search for solar energy storage catalysts
Eons ago, nature solved the problem of converting solar energy to fuels by inventing the process of photosynthesis.
It's in the genes: Research pinpoints how plants know when to flower
Scientists believe they've pinpointed the last crucial piece of the 80-year-old puzzle of how plants "know" when to flower.
Researchers solve structure of human protein critical for silencing genes
In a study published in the journal Cell on May 24, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSHL) scientists describe the three-dimensional atomic structure of a human protein bound to a piece of RNA that "guides" the pr ...

Dec 26, 2010
Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
Ironically, the EU and US slap microsoft with a fine every time they tried to do some form in software integration in the past.
However, microsoft needs to adapt by really getting their hands into the hardware market directly, which they have made some attempts in the past several years, such as gaming consoles, etc. Problem is, governments don't want to allow microsoft to really do this, but they allow Apple to do it. Remember when the EU forced microsoft to remove their browser from the OS package, because it quashed competition, but here Apple could sell an integrated computer/phone/mp3/browser in one package with no fine.
Integration is one thing Apple has always done through selling the hardware and software as a single package, often as a "one-piece" unit. Microsoft is more or less, "let someone else make the computers, and we'll just make software." It isn't going to be possible for them to continue with that practice.
Dec 26, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
I guess people realize "E-Readers" are already obsolete. Like I said on that other thread, they will shortly be relegated to nothing more than a "display add-on" for smart phones, for people with bad eyesight.
All in all, microsoft needs to diversify more into the hardware sector with fully integrated technologies, and the hypocrite governments need to back off now that all these companies are making smart phones and other integrated "do it all" devices.
Dec 26, 2010
Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
Dec 26, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (5)
By all means, build competitors to the iPad, but why build hardware that looks the same and use Google's operating system knock-off rather than build something better?
If you think its not possible to improve on Apple's products rather than just copy them, watch for Apple's next products. They provide their own competition!
Not only that, why not use Apple's business model and build products Apple doesn't? Smart vehicles? Smart homes? Robots? Life for everyone will be richer.
Dec 26, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Already newer models have:
Phone
2 cameras
full color display w/ touch interface
gyroscope
accelerometer
gps
internet
gaming
USB
(insert "almost anything a laptop can do")
Is there anything else we can think of that would be useful to integrate into these devices?
Thermometer?
Barometer?
Humidity (think it's "cyclometer", but not sure.)
Just imagine how accurate weather forecasts could be if every smart phone became a data point for weather...Ok, you'd need to throw out data from phones that are indoors...
Dec 26, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Read above. "Anti-microsoft" laws. Governments arbitrarily forbade microsoft from really doing anything other than making operating systems and making word processor/database software, and even then, they fined them unless they split them into two seperate packages.
Oh yeah, people are actively working on "smart home" technology, its just things are more complicated than they first appear. The concept isn't new, the application is just difficult. Star Trek and the Jetsons first popularized the concept, but the actual doing of it takes integrated computer technologies that are only just now becoming affordable.
We are going to see nano-assembers are practical household "chore doer" robots over the next several decades as software, hardware, and networking technologies will make it possible.
Dec 26, 2010
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
The Body is just a remote-controlled dummy. Most of the Brain will be just one application on the PC. There will be no "robot revolution" because all you have to do is pull the cord.
Dec 26, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Now in 10 or 15 years as things start to hit practical, physical limits, then it will make more sense for people to fully integrate their house into their home computer networks.
Dec 26, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
http://www.fec.go...ea.shtml
Dec 26, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
HAHAHA
Dec 26, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Well, I thought of something else could be integrated into a smart phone. This really would be a step towards the medical tricorder.
You know those little monitors you can put on your finger to count pulse and blood oxygen levels? That shouldn't be too hard to fit into one of these gadgets. We should also be able to fit a digital blood glucose test kit for diabetics too. This would allow everyone, diabetic or not, to do blood tests so they can track their health. Alternatively, someone could develop an wrist-watch with a USB port that would network to a computer or smart phone to do these more specialized tasks.
Well, gee, I give away ideas and concepts for free, but it's not like I'm personally in any position to "capitalize" on it anyway, and besides someone else has probably thought of this stuff before anyway.
Dec 26, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
No hypocrisy. MS chiefly sells OSes and business/office software. They were actively trying to monopolize access to the internet via their browser to the point of shoehorning it into the OS to make it harder to remove.
Apple basically sells appliances. They pick and/or design the hardware, including add-ons and make it operate within a walled environment of their making. They're not selling general purpose software. That's the chief difference.
That would be a mistake. Design and hardware isn't their core competency, in fact, they suck at it. They're a software company and should remain so. But they also need to be better at that too...
Dec 27, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
.......................................
Hardware design is done using software tools so naturally Microsoft or any software company should be good at it.
Dec 27, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Dec 27, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Dec 27, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
The whole early adopter mentality plays into it as well.
Dec 27, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
DamienS: Yea I refuse to install itunes or use an apple product because of itunes. my android phone lets me just copy music and other files directly to the phone's sd card. There are people out there that don't have an idea how to do that though; but I'm guessing those people aren't worried about how itunes runs. and those stupid background services that it tries to run suck up computer resources.
Dec 27, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Dec 28, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Dec 31, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
I could careless if people get that big of a hard on from a certain company's products, but do you really want a messiah that wears black mock turtle neck shirts and stone wash jeans? C'mon Jobs, you've changed the world of technology...you could at least upgrade the wardrobe.
Jan 01, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Jan 02, 2011
Rank: not rated yet