New statistical model moves human evolution back 3 million years

Nov 05, 2010

Evolutionary divergence of humans from chimpanzees likely occurred some 8 million years ago rather than the 5 million year estimate widely accepted by scientists, a new statistical model suggests.

The revised estimate of when the human species parted ways from its closest primate relatives should enable scientists to better interpret the history of human evolution, said Robert D. Martin, curator of at the Field Museum, and a co-author of the new study appearing in the journal Systematic Biology.

Working with mathematicians, anthropologists and molecular biologists, Martin has long sought to integrate evolutionary information derived from genetic material in various species with the to get a more complete picture.

Comparing DNA among related animals can provide a clear picture of how their shared genes evolved over time, giving rise to new and separate species, Martin said. But such molecular information doesn't yield a timetable showing when the genetic divergence occurred.

is the only direct source of information about long-extinct species and their evolution, Martin and his colleagues said, but large gaps in the fossil record can make such information difficult to interpret. For a generation, paleontologists have estimated at 5 million to 6 million years ago.

But that estimate rests on a thin fossil record. By looking at all of today's , all of the known fossil primates and using DNA evidence, computer models suggest a longer evolutionary timetable. The new analysis described in the Systematic Biology paper takes into account gaps in the fossil record and fills in those gaps statistically.

Such modeling techniques, which are widely used in science and commerce, take into account more overall information than earlier processes used to estimate evolutionary history using just a few individual fossil dates, Martin said. It can give scientists a broader perspective for interpreting data.

One example is a skull fossil discovered in Chad (central Africa) earlier in this decade. The fossil, named Sahelanthropus tchadensis and nicknamed Toumaï (which means "hope of life" in the local Goran language), raised great interest because it has many human characteristics. But consensus on how to classify the discovery has been elusive particularly because the fossil is about 7 million years old, well beyond the accepted time frame for human evolution.

Under the new estimate, Toumaï would fall within the period after the human lineage split from chimpanzees, Martin said.

The new approach to dating evolutionary history builds on earlier work by Martin and colleagues. In 2002, they published a paper in Nature that argues the last common ancestor of today's primates lived some 85 million years ago.

This implies that for 20 million years before dinosaurs became extinct, early versions of primates also lived and evolved. It challenged the accepted theory that primates and other mammals didn't really thrive on the planet until dinosaurs were gone.

After that paper was published, Martin said he expected someone would apply the new statistical techniques to the question of human evolution, but when no one did, "We decided to do it ourselves."

Explore further: Study sheds new light on the diet of extinct animals

More information: Here is a link to the article: http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2010/11/04/sysbio.syq054.full.html?ijkey=CaQif1LgTAd7xOD&keytype=ref

Related Stories

Early humans on the menu

Feb 27, 2006

It is a widely accepted view in both research and popular literature: our ancient ancestors were hunters; aggressive, competitive and natural killers. This “Man the Hunter” idea has long influenced our understanding of ...

New theory on the origin of primates

Jan 19, 2010

A new model for primate origins is presented in Zoologica Scripta, published by the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters and The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. The paper argues that the distributions of the major ...

Evolution rewritten, again and again

Aug 31, 2010

A team of researchers at the University of Bristol decided to find out, with investigations of dinosaur and human evolution. Their study, which is published this week in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, suggests most f ...

Recommended for you

Study sheds new light on the diet of extinct animals

9 hours ago

A study of tooth enamel in mammals living today in the equatorial forest of Gabon could ultimately shed light on the diet of long extinct animals, according to new research from the University of Bristol.

Ancient clay seals may shed light on biblical era

Dec 20, 2014

Impressions from ancient clay seals found at a small site in Israel east of Gaza are signs of government in an area thought to be entirely rural during the 10th century B.C., says Mississippi State University archaeologist ...

Digging up the 'Spanish Vikings'

Dec 19, 2014

The fearsome reputation of the Vikings has made them the subject of countless exhibitions, books and films - however, surprisingly little is known about their more southerly exploits in Spain.

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

John_balls
3.7 / 5 (3) Nov 05, 2010
I thought the chimp and man shared a common ancestor and not that we split from the chimp?
CSharpner
5 / 5 (4) Nov 05, 2010
I thought the chimp and man shared a common ancestor and not that we split from the chimp?

I think it's just poor word choice in this article. I believe they meant that humans and chimps were once the same species, but that species branched. One branch eventually evolving into today's chimps and the other evolving into modern day humans.
mathman
not rated yet Nov 05, 2010
I only know what I have read in articles like this in the past, as well as books on the subject. Unless my memory s completely faulty, I have been under the impression that the human-chimp split took place around 8 million years ago. I remember seeing charts with early hominoid fossils (I think that's the right term) dating back close to 7 million years ago. ????????????
dan42day
1 / 5 (1) Nov 07, 2010
Deja vu?
Rydog
1 / 5 (1) Nov 08, 2010
I wonder what the statistics are on the chance of functional proteins being made from chance are?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.