Senate passes bill to boost food safety
November 30, 2010 By MARY CLARE JALONICK , Associated Press
In this Nov. 16, 2010 file photo, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nev., gestures during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington. The Food and Drug Administration would have to step up inspections of food processors under legislation the Senate is expected to pass this week. The bill, which has stalled in that chamber for more than a year, would give the FDA authority to order a recall of tainted products. Today, the agency must negotiate with sellers of tainted food to do a voluntary recall. The bill would also require food manufacturers and farms to follow stricter standards to keep food safe. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File)
(AP) -- The Senate passed legislation Tuesday to make food safer in the wake of deadly E. coli and salmonella outbreaks, potentially giving the government broad new powers to increase inspections of food processing facilities and force companies to recall tainted food.
The $1.4 billion bill, which would also place stricter standards on imported foods, passed the Senate 73-25. Supporters say passage is critical after widespread outbreaks in peanuts, eggs and produce.
Those outbreaks have exposed a lack of resources and authority at the FDA as the embattled agency struggled to contain and trace the contaminated products. The agency rarely inspects many food facilities and farms, visiting some every decade or so and others not at all.
The bill would emphasize prevention so the agency could try to stop outbreaks before they begin. Farmers and food processors would have to tell the Food and Drug Administration how they are working to keep their food safe at different stages of production.
Despite wide bipartisan support and backing from many major food companies, the legislation stalled as it came under fire from advocates of buying locally produced food and operators of small farms, who said it would could bankrupt some small businesses. Senators eventually agreed to exempt some of those operations from costly food safety plans required of bigger companies, rankling food safety advocates and larger growers but gaining support from farm-state senators.
Senate sponsors further softened the bill's impact on the food industry - including eliminating some fees processors would have to pay and reducing the number of required inspections - to gain votes in the Senate and to make the bill more palatable in the House. Members of both parties voiced concern about the legislation's impact on small farms and businesses when a different version of the bill passed that chamber in 2009.
The bill's prospects are unclear since there is little time during the brief lame-duck congressional session for the House and Senate to reconcile different versions. Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin, the sponsor of the Senate legislation, said he has agreement from some members in the House to pass the Senate bill, which would send the legislation straight to President Barack Obama's desk.
Senators rejected several unrelated amendments to the bill, including an amendment to place a moratorium on earmarks, or pet projects in lawmakers' states and districts, and one to repeal an arcane tax provision that helps pay for President Barack Obama's new health care law. Supporters said the amendments would have killed the bill's chances in the House.
The Senate legislation would:
-Allow the FDA to order a recall of tainted foods. Currently the agency can only negotiate with businesses to order voluntary recalls;
-Require larger food processors and manufacturers to register with the Food and Drug Administration and create detailed food safety plans;
-Require the FDA to create new produce safety regulations for producers of the highest-risk fruits and vegetables;
-Establish stricter standards for the safety of imported food;
-Increase inspections of domestic and foreign food facilities, directing the most resources to those operations with the highest risk profiles.
The bill would not apply to meat, poultry or processed eggs, which are regulated by the Agriculture Department. Those foods have long been subject to much more rigorous inspections and oversight than FDA-regulated foods.
The federal Centers for Disease Control has estimated that tens of millions of Americans are sickened and thousands die from foodborne illnesses each year.
©2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
28 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
41 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
30 comments
-
Scotland passes turbine test to harness tidal power,
40 comments
-
Classical and Quantum Mechanics via Lie algebras
Apr 15, 2011
- More from Physics Forums - Independent Research
More news stories
Of mice and mental models: Neuroscientific implications of risk-optimized behavior in the mouse
(Medical Xpress) -- Regardless of an organism’s biological complexity, every encephalized animal continuously makes under-informed behavioral choices that can have serious consequences. Despite its ubiquity, ...
Skp2 activates cancer-promoting, glucose-processing Akt
HER2 and its epidermal growth factor receptor cousins mobilize a specialized protein to activate a major player in cancer development and sugar metabolism, scientists report in the May 25 issue of Cell.
11 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
|
Tongue analysis software uses ancient Chinese medicine to warn of disease
For 5,000 years, the Chinese have used a system of medicine based on the flow and balance of positive and negative energies in the body. In this system, the appearance of the tongue is one of the measures used to classify ...
8 hours ago |
1 / 5 (1) |
0
|
Cancer may require simpler genetic mutations than previously thought
Chromosomal deletions in DNA often involve just one of two gene copies inherited from either parent. But scientists haven't known how a deletion in one gene from one parent, called a "hemizygous" deletion, can contribute ...
14 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
|
First study to suggest that the immune system may protect against Alzheimer's changes in humans
Recent work in mice suggested that the immune system is involved in removing beta-amyloid, the main Alzheimer's-causing substance in the brain. Researchers have now shown for the first time that this may apply in humans.
Medicine & Health / Alzheimer's disease & dementia
15 hours ago |
5 / 5 (3) |
0
|
Dragon arrives at space station in historic 1st (Update 2)
The privately bankrolled Dragon capsule made a historic arrival at the International Space Station on Friday, triumphantly captured by astronauts wielding a giant robot arm.
Landmark calculation clears the way to answering how matter is formed
(Phys.org) -- An international collaboration of scientists, including Thomas Blum, associate professor of physics, is reporting in landmark detail the decay process of a subatomic particle called a kaon ...
High-speed method to aid search for solar energy storage catalysts
Eons ago, nature solved the problem of converting solar energy to fuels by inventing the process of photosynthesis.
It's in the genes: Research pinpoints how plants know when to flower
Scientists believe they've pinpointed the last crucial piece of the 80-year-old puzzle of how plants "know" when to flower.
Researchers solve structure of human protein critical for silencing genes
In a study published in the journal Cell on May 24, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSHL) scientists describe the three-dimensional atomic structure of a human protein bound to a piece of RNA that "guides" the pr ...
MIT researchers devise new means to synchronize a group of robots (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- For several years, roboticists have been working out ways to get a group of robots to perform synchronized activities as demonstrated most often in dance routines. Its not just about trying ...
Nov 30, 2010
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (3)
Nov 30, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Nov 30, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Ho-hum. Dog bites man. So what else is new? Doesn't seem to matter which party is in power, all we get is changes in which groups get screwed and which get preferences.
The only thing Orwell got wrong was the year.
Dec 01, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Dec 01, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
It has the additional tonic effect of putting a severe, if not killing stress upon small and medium food-producing businesses. Your local Farmer's Market may soon be a thing of the past, unless you count Monsanto, Del Monte, Simplot, ADM, et al, as true representatives of the traditional Farmer's Market.
Also, kiss your GNC, Herbalife, and similar supplements good bye, as, under the new "Food Safety" bill these sorts of products will become the exclusive province of Big Pharma, under the "harmonization" with Codex Alimentarius provisions also contained in the bill.
Bon Apetit!
Dec 01, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Dec 01, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (3)
I never said we were there yet, but all the trend lines point there at some time in the next several decades. Governments just keep accruing power to themselves, the ruling elites just keep getting more distant from the "small people", and those trends are accelerating exponentially.
We are overspending and overgoverning ourselves into oblivion. Once the inevitable worldwide economic crash hits, we will have always been at war with Eastasia. Then get back to me on how 1984 will never happen.
And as a matter of fact, I read the book a long time ago, when the Cold War was at its height. I thought that when the Wall fell, the world had finally purged itself of communism. All that happened was that they changed their name to Marxists instead, and took over the universities. I never in my wildest nightmares thought we'd elect one president.
Dec 01, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
http://www.mcclat...hat.html
But perhaps this is the plan, now they an excuse and can write another 10000 page bill that no one will read, to regulate beef.
However the good news about this bill is that this so called food safety bill is actually a tax, and the democrats violated a constitutional provision requiring that tax provisions originates in the House.
http://www.rollca...2-1.html
Progressives hate it when people read the bill then apply the constitution....
Dec 01, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Constitution? Democrats don' need no steenkeen' constitution!
Former (thank the FSM!) Rep Phil Hare (D-IL) says he doesn't care about the constitution. Re-elected (in CA - figures) lunatic Rep Pete Stark (D) says the federal government can do whatever it wants. Our Community-Organizer-in-Chief (D) thinks the constitution is deficient because it doesn't demand redistribution of wealth.
And the legal profession, one of the Democrats' largest supporters, has been trained in Critical Legal Studies or its offshoots for decades. CLS says that the constitution is "just words", to be defined as whatever a judge wants it to be.
Dec 01, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)