Terrifying pterosaurs were fragile in flight

Nov 23, 2010
A mockup of a pterosaur. Pterosaurs, the largest creatures ever to take to the skies, were adept fliers in a balmy breeze but would have crashed in stormy weather, according to a study published Wednesday.

Pterosaurs, the largest creatures ever to take to the skies, were adept fliers in a balmy breeze but would have crashed in stormy weather, according to a study published Wednesday.

Evolutionary biologists have long puzzled over the aerodynamic abilities of the , which cohabited the planet with dinosaurs during the Mesozoic era 220 to 65 million years ago.

A few scientists have even suggested that pterosaurs, also known as pterodactyls, probably couldn't fly at all.

With a wingspan of up to 12 metres (39 feet) and weighing up to 200 kilos (440 pounds), just getting airborne was surely a challenge.

But engineer-cum-palaeontologist Colin Palmer at the University of Bristol in Britain has shown in wind-tunnel experiments that the prehistoric beasts were in fact stunningly adapted for certain types of flight.

Using curved sheets composed of and carbon fibre, Palmer constructed models of pterosaur wing sections based on .

Recent experiments on low-speed airfoils and sail boats provided clues on how the animal's sail-like wings might have functioned.

Then he tested the strength and aerodynamic properties of the mock appendages in a wind tunnel, much as a flight engineer might assess designs for an .

What he found was that the animals were best suited for flying smoothly over hillsides and coastlines on gentle thermals, or warm air currents.

Slow flight and the variable geometry of their wings also enabled them to perform soft landings, reducing the risk of breaking their fragile bones.

"Since the bones of the were thin-walled and thus highly susceptible to impact damage, the low-speed landing capability would have made an important contribution to avoiding injury," Palmer said.

The tests also showed, however, that powerful gusts would almost certainly have sent the creatures plummeting to Earth.

"The tradeoff would have been an extreme vulnerability to strong and turbulent winds both in flight and on the ground, like that experienced by modern-day paragliders," Palmer noted.

The study was published in the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, a journal of Britain's de-facto academy of science.

Explore further: Seeing dinosaur feathers in a new light

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Four, three, two, one... pterosaurs have lift off

Jan 06, 2009

Pterosaurs have long suffered an identity crisis. Pop culture heedlessly — and wrongly — lumps these extinct flying lizards in with dinosaurs. Even paleontologists assumed that because the creatures flew, they were birdlike ...

Recommended for you

Seeing dinosaur feathers in a new light

23 hours ago

Why were dinosaurs covered in a cloak of feathers long before the early bird species Archaeopteryx first attempted flight? Researchers from the University of Bonn and the University of Göttingen attempt ...

Mexico archaeologists explore Teotihuacan tunnel (Update)

Oct 29, 2014

A yearslong exploration of a tunnel sealed almost 2,000 years ago at the ancient city of Teotihuacan yielded thousands of relics and the discovery of three chambers that could hold more important finds, Mexican ...

Peruvian dig reveals sacrificial mystery

Oct 29, 2014

Tulane University physical anthropologist John Verano has spent summers in Peru for the last 30 years, digging for ancient bones and solving their secrets. But his most recent work focuses on a unique archeological ...

Phaistos Disk may be prayer to mother goddess

Oct 27, 2014

Ancient writing systems and their meanings absorb scientists who dedicate years of work to deciphering and sorting through arguments to determine the true meaning and purpose of writings. The latest news ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Ravenrant
3 / 5 (4) Nov 23, 2010
BS, nature doesn't do that. If all we had was fossil evidence of birds and they found a fossil Albatross they probably would have said the same thing.
deatopmg
5 / 5 (2) Nov 23, 2010
Ravenrant - You are absolutely correct!!!
How could a species have survived 155 (220 - 65)million years and not be able to stay aloft in "strong and turbulent winds". Gale force winds and up - OK.

Nature simply doesn't do that, engineers do.
jimbo92107
4.5 / 5 (2) Nov 24, 2010
It is possible that these creatures also were quite adept at anticipating bad weather, and at sensing when they were in an environment where turbulence could be a problem. Birds today are often quite skillful fliers; we cannot assume that ancient fliers were any less expert at optimizing their performance in the air. Skill counts for a lot.
kevinrtrs
1.7 / 5 (6) Nov 24, 2010
This article should go on to say that the humble bumble bee should not be flying either - but it does.
Or that for the dragonfly, an unhappy flightless and totally nightmare existence should be in the offing - except that it's the most adept prey tracker of all.
So-called experts are usually totally flabbergasted at what ingenious designs the creator has put in place.
Ethelred
4 / 5 (4) Nov 27, 2010
This article should go on to say that the humble bumble bee should not be flying either - but it does
Bad math by one engineer does not an expert make.
- except that it's the most adept prey tracker of all.
Yes that is how evolution works. Species that hunt evolve features that support hunting. Like HUGE eyes.

So-called experts are usually totally flabbergasted at what ingenious designs the creator has put in place.


Nonsense. They are fascinated by how they evolved via natural laws that show a world vastly older than you accept.

When was the Flood Kevin?

Ethelred

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.