Powerful LED flash for smartphones

Nov 26, 2010
The new Oslux provides brighter and more uniform light across the entire illuminated surface. With its compact dimensions it is perfect for modern low-profile cell phone and smartphone designs. Press picture: OSRAM

Researchers from Osram Opto Semiconductors have developed an LED chip that makes it possible to offer smaller pocket projectors, vehicle headlights, and cell phone camera flashes. In combination with a new package the new UX:3 chip is 50 percent brighter than the precursor package. In combination with an optimized lens, the light is much better distributed. The chip is used in the Oslux LED, which is therefore considerably more efficient at high currents than previous LEDs and is impressive for its very high luminous efficiency over a small area.

At a distance of one meter, for instance, such an LED flash evenly illuminates a diagonal of 90 cm. That is sufficient for capturing sharp images even under unfavorable light conditions. At 150 lux, the LED with the UX:3 chip is 50 lux brighter than its predecessor. As a result, high-quality images can be taken even with very flat cell phones or smartphones.

Normally, when taking photos at night with a camera phone, the flash is capable of relatively bright illumination of the middle of the image area, but the corners appear somewhat dark. This is because the of the LED itself is too low — it just can’t produce enough light — and the lens doesn’t distribute the light evenly enough. This creates a bright circle with dark edges, an effect that occurs especially under very unfavorable light conditions. To change this situation, the researchers from Osram rearranged the internal layout of the chip.

The chip consists of a metallic lattice and two semiconductor layers. The lattice conducts the current to the upper layer, from where the electrons move to the lower layer and release energy in the form of light. With conventional LEDs, however, the metallic lattice is positioned above both layers and thus diminishes the light. The effect is similar to what would happen if you place a dark cloth over a light bulb. The researchers at Osram therefore moved the lattice all the way to the bottom, enabling them to increase the “wall plug efficiency,” which describes the relationship between the radiant flux of the chip and the electrical power that flows through it.

Explore further: Security CTO to detail Android Fake ID flaw at Black Hat

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Brightest LED Puts Light Bulbs in the Shade

Jun 14, 2005

Osram has developed the world’s brightest white light-emitting diode. Known as Ostar Lighting, this LED supplies 200 lumens, thus literally putting light bulbs and neon lamps in the shade. Previously, the brightest LED ...

Red light-emitting diode sets new efficiency record

Aug 16, 2010

Osram Opto Semiconductors has raised the efficiency of its high-performance red light-emitting diode (LED) by 30% under laboratory conditions. This record-setting efficiency was achieved through optimization of the chips. ...

Osram LEDs for Mini Projectors

Mar 04, 2010

New, particularly high-performance light-emitting diodes (LEDs) from Osram make it possible to build mini projectors. These LEDs produce enough light to project images measuring over one meter in diagonal ...

Detecting drivers in microsleep with infrared LED

Oct 20, 2010

A new infrared light-emitting diode (IR-LED) from the Siemens subsidiary Osram Opto Semiconductors is designed to help recognize the hazardous microsleep that affects motorists. In addition to the IR-LED, ...

Recommended for you

Why let your sales force influence product prices?

17 minutes ago

From the outside, you might not notice the ongoing tension within many large businesses: the battle between salespeople, on the one hand, and marketers and product managers, on the other. Because the salespeople ...

Breakthrough elastic cloud-to cloud networking

48 minutes ago

Scientists from AT&T, IBM and Applied Communication Sciences (ACS) announced a proof-of-concept technology that reduces set up times for cloud-to-cloud connectivity from days to seconds. This advance is a major step forward ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Eikka
4 / 5 (1) Nov 26, 2010
Lux is a measure of how much light falls onto an area, which means that you can make an LED brighter in Lux by narrowing the projection angle of the lens without actually making it output more light.

So you can't make a direct comparison between LEDs like that. The competitor may offer less light per area, but also illuminate a bigger area. You may get more even light within the area, but less light outside of it.

An ordinary point&shoot camera will, at the wide angle end of the lens, see a much greater area at 1m distance than a 90cm diagonal square, which means that if the light of the LED is concentrated mainly in that area, you get dark edges unless you zoom in.

And again, as with all LEDs, you can cheat by omitting wavelenghts that the eye isn't sensitive to, but which are still required for good color reproduction. This gives you a higher lumen/lux figure with the same power which looks good on the brochure, but the colors in the photo will be off.
Eikka
3 / 5 (1) Nov 26, 2010
Imagine for example, that you have a lamp that outputs very monochromatic light at 445nm, 545nm and 580nm. These are approximately the peaks of the human color vision sensitivity curve, so the light appears quite brilliant and white and will therefore have a good luminous efficiency as measured in lumens or lux per watt. This makes it very good for purposes like building a television backlight, because TVs need only those wavelenghts in different proportions to simulate all the different colors.

But, if you use the lamp to illuminate an object that reflects light at, say mostly 500 nm, it will look strangely colorless and possibly very dark.

That's because the eye, or a camera, "triangulates" any light it sees based on how much it affects the differently tuned sensors, so in the absence of a specific wavelenght, an object cannot bounce it to the eye and you can't see its color correctly.

The color rendering index may vary. That's also why direct comparison between LEDs is difficult.
Eikka
5 / 5 (1) Nov 26, 2010
The point is, that while the article makes this new LED sound much better than its predecessor, it omits all the real details about how they actually compare and what limitations the new LED has.

I find this a lot in reports about LED efficiency and applications, and I find it sad that they have to restort to these kinds of "half truths" in marketing them.

It's very much alike the electric car situation where the company touts a range of a 100 miles and conviniently forgets to tell that you can only achieve that by driving slower than 40 mph.