Physicists produce black hole plasma in the lab
Exotic structure: There is a lot of turbulence in the vicinity of a black hole. What exactly is happening there? Image: NASA/Dana Berry, SkyWorks Digital
(PhysOrg.com) -- Black holes are voracious: They devour large amounts of matter from gas clouds or stars in their neighbourhood. As the incoming "food" spirals faster and faster into the abyss, it becomes denser and denser, and heats up to temperatures of many millions of degrees Celsius. Before the matter finally disappears, it emits extraordinarily intense X-rays into space. This "last cry" originates from iron, one of the elements contained in this matter. Researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics in Heidelberg have collaborated with colleagues at the Helmholtz Zentrum Berlin and used the BESSY II synchrotron X-ray source to investigate what happens in this process.
In order to understand the nature of black holes, it is best to watch them feeding. The most interesting part is just before the matter disappears behind the event horizon - that is, the distance at which the mass attraction of the black hole becomes so strong that not even light can escape. This turbulent process generates X-rays, which in turn excite various chemical elements in the cloud of matter to emit X-rays themselves with characteristic lines ("colours"). An analysis of the lines provides information on the density, velocity and composition of the plasmas near the event horizon.
During this process iron plays an important role. Although it is not as abundant in the universe as lighter elements - mainly hydrogen and helium - it is much better at absorbing and reemitting X-rays. The photons emitted thereby also have a higher energy, respectively a shorter wavelength (a different "colour"), than that of the lighter atoms.
They therefore leave behind clear fingerprints in the rainbow of the dispersed radiation: in the spectrum they reveal themselves as strong lines. The so-called K-alpha line of iron is the final visible spectral signature of matter, its "last cry", before it disappears behind the event horizon of a black hole, never to be seen again.
The X-rays emitted are also absorbed as they pass through the medium surrounding the black hole at larger distances. And here iron again leaves behind clear fingerprints in the spectra. The radiation ionises the atoms several times and so-called photoionisation typically strips away more than half of the 26 electrons which the iron atoms usually contain. This produces ions with positive charge states that correspond to the number of stripped electrons. The end result is highly charged ions produced not by collisions but by radiation.
It is precisely this process, the stripping of further electrons from highly charged ions by incident X-rays, which researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics have reproduced in the laboratory in collaboration with colleagues at BESSY II - the Berlin synchrotron X-ray source. The heart of the experiment was the EBIT electron beam ion trap designed at the Max-Planck institute. Inside the trap, iron atoms were heated up with the aid of an intense electron beam as they would be deep inside the sun or, as in this case, in the vicinity of a black hole.
Under such conditions, iron exists, for example, as the Fe14+ ion, ionised fourteen times as it were. The experiment proceeds as follows: A cloud of these ions, only a few centimetres long and thin as a hair, is kept suspended in an ultra-high vacuum with the help of magnetic and electric fields. X-rays from the synchrotron then impact on this cloud; the photon energy of the X-rays is selected by a "monochromator" with extreme precision and directed onto the ions as a thin, focused beam.
The researchers use EBIT, the electron beam ion trap, to reconstruct processes in the laboratory as they occur in the matter around black holes. Image: MPI for Nuclear Physics
The spectral lines measured in this experiment can be directly and easily compared with the most recent observations made by X-ray observatories, like Chandra and XMM-Newton. It turns out that most of the theoretical calculation methods used do not predict the line positions accurately enough. This is a big problem for the astrophysicists, because without accurate knowledge of the wavelengths there is no accurate determination of the so-called Doppler effect of these lines.The Doppler effect describes the change in frequency (energy or wavelength) of the emitted light as a function of the velocity of the source (the ions in the plasma.). Anyone who listens to the siren of a passing ambulance experiences this phenomenon: as long as the vehicle approaches, the perceived pitch of the sound is higher; as it moves away, it is lower. If the frequency in the system at rest is known (ambulance is stationary), measuring the pitch makes it possible to determine the velocity of the source - in astronomy this is the plasma.
This left the scientists puzzled over the interpretation of NGC 3783, one of the active galactic nuclei which have been under investigation for the longest time. The error bars in the frequency in a rest frame calculated with the aid of different theoretical models led to such large uncertainties in the derived velocity of the emitting plasma that reliable statements on the plasma flows were no longer possible.
The laboratory measurements of the Heidelberg-based Max-Planck researchers have now identified one theoretical method among several model calculations that provides the most accurate predictions. They also achieved the highest spectral resolution to date in this wavelength range. It had previously not been possible to experimentally check the different theories in this energy range with such high accuracy.
The novel combination of a trap for highly charged ions and bright synchrotron radiation sources thus represents an important step and a new approach for understanding the physics in the plasmas around black holes or active galactic nuclei. The researchers expect the combination of EBIT spectroscopy and brighter and brighter X-ray sources of the third (PETRA III at DESY) and fourth generation (free-electron laser XFEL, Hamburg/Germany; LCLS, Stanford, USA; SCSS, Tsukuba, Japan) to bring fresh drive to this field.
More information: Physical Review Letters, Vol. 105, p. 183001, October 29, 2010. The article in Physical Review Letters - http://link.aps.or … t.105.183001
Provided by
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
28 comments
-
Every black hole contains a new universe: A physicist presents a solution to present-day cosmic mysteries,
216 comments
-
New silicon memory chip developed,
16 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
41 comments
-
has anyone had this happen
44 minutes ago
-
I need help with understanding of Inertia of a slender rod and plate?
2 hours ago
-
Voltage and current in a series circuit
4 hours ago
-
Force on the top hinge of an open door
4 hours ago
-
Specular reflection from moving mirrors
8 hours ago
-
Setting Up a Nitrogen Laser
10 hours ago
- More from Physics Forums - General Physics
More news stories
Landmark calculation clears the way to answering how matter is formed
(Phys.org) -- An international collaboration of scientists, including Thomas Blum, associate professor of physics, is reporting in landmark detail the decay process of a subatomic particle called a kaon ...
11 hours ago |
4.8 / 5 (9) |
20
|
Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?
(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...
Lying in wait for WIMPs: Researchers seek to dramatically increase sensitivity of Large Underground Xenon detector
Although it's invisible, dark matter accounts for at least 80 percent of the matter in the universe. No one knows what it is, but most scientists would bet on weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs.
May 23, 2012 |
4 / 5 (5) |
13
|
Cloak of invisibility: Engineers use plasmonics to create an invisible photodetector
A team of engineers at Stanford and the University of Pennsylvania has for the first time used "plasmonic cloaking" to create a device that can see without being seen - an invisible machine that detects light. It is the first ...
May 21, 2012 |
4.8 / 5 (16) |
7
|
Hall effect at the speed of light: How can you demonstrate relativistic effects with your mobile phone?
The relativistic Hall effect describing objects rotating at speeds comparable with the speed of light has been reported.
May 21, 2012 |
4.3 / 5 (3) |
8
It's in the genes: Research pinpoints how plants know when to flower
Scientists believe they've pinpointed the last crucial piece of the 80-year-old puzzle of how plants "know" when to flower.
High-speed method to aid search for solar energy storage catalysts
Eons ago, nature solved the problem of converting solar energy to fuels by inventing the process of photosynthesis.
Researchers solve structure of human protein critical for silencing genes
In a study published in the journal Cell on May 24, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSHL) scientists describe the three-dimensional atomic structure of a human protein bound to a piece of RNA that "guides" the pr ...
Dragon makes history with space station docking
The private company SpaceX made history Friday with the docking of its Dragon capsule to the International Space Station, the most impressive feat yet in turning routine spaceflight over to the commercial ...
Yahoo kills 'Livestand' just 6 months after debut
(AP) -- Yahoo is killing a tablet magazine called Livestand just six months its debut on the iPad.
Tongue analysis software uses ancient Chinese medicine to warn of disease
For 5,000 years, the Chinese have used a system of medicine based on the flow and balance of positive and negative energies in the body. In this system, the appearance of the tongue is one of the measures used to classify ...
.jpeg)
Nov 04, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Are not x-rays affected by enormous gravitational forces?
Nov 04, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (12)
The X-Rays are coming from outside the event horizon. Outside the event horizon, anything with enough velocity can escape a black hole. These signatures are from just outside that radius.
Nov 04, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (9)
http://en.wikiped...f_matter
I must say the headline is more than a little misleading. No planets teeming with life were harmed during the reported experiment.
Nov 04, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (9)
As ThatOneGuy points out, the x-rays are coming from outside the event horizon. One the important pieces of information conveyed by these x-rays is the intensity of the gravity effects that they encounter. This allows calculations involving their location relative to the event horizon among other things.
Nov 04, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (10)
I hope, I didn't confuse this subject a lot...
Nov 05, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Nov 05, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
But anyone examining the photo..the 'artist's rendition' should conclude that the artist needs some input! It seems clear there that the x-rays are emanating from the core of the BH itself ... axial, they are. .. clearly ..
but clearly wrong?
Nov 05, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Nov 05, 2010
Rank: 1.3 / 5 (13)
The only things we do know is that x rays are being emitted from the galactic core and that gravitational models of astromechanics are completely inadequate to explain our observations. Beyond that its all just speculation and steering of public opinion in favor of theories that require ad hoc miracles to make them work.
If your theory doesn't fit the observational data, scrap it and start over. A good theory doesn't require willful suspension itf disbelief or and endless of array of counterintuitive and implausible band-aids to fix it.
Nov 05, 2010
Rank: 4.2 / 5 (11)
Nov 05, 2010
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (16)
Nov 05, 2010
Rank: 4.2 / 5 (11)
you are actually stating that you require an unobservable object to be observed, it order to prove its (unobservable) existence??
You must be joking ... right??
TELL me you're joking ... maybe a teeenyweeenie joke?? a grab for a chuckle??
You do get a smirk, but not for the reason you might assume ..
or am i not smirking?? apparently i cant, unless it's right in front of you..
Yes, 'evidence' is a king, with logic as its partner.
Nov 06, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (11)
Nov 06, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (11)
Nov 06, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (8)
I sure haven't observed you directly either.
Nov 06, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
time should be extremely contracted close in to the event horizon. to an outside observer, time should appear, to stop at this limit.
why isn't the light emitted by the in-falling matter not significantly red-shifted?
Nov 06, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Nov 06, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Wild speculation from these two posts, but if someone could offer an informed opinion them, I would appreciate it.
Nov 07, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Nov 07, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
I don't see where Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle has anything to do with being 'uncertain' about whether or not a thing is energy or matter or both ...
The principle is about the uncertainty in knowing all features of a particle at a given instant .. its momentum and its position .. One can not know both at the same time. Unless, of course, some accepted theory mod exists of which I am not aware ..
Nov 07, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
I'm thinking the uncertainty of the position of the particle near the radius. If the particle is past the radius it contributes to mass and size of the radius ,however if it doesn't pass the radius stays. So the radius also becomes uncertain on atomic scales. This fuzzy radius blurs the transition of the particle from being matter (and having mass) to becoming radiation (not having mass) and escaping the gravity of the hole.
Nov 07, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Nov 07, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Yet even the hole can't measure both. If it could we could also measure both. That's the uncertainty. Either the position (mass) is known or the momentum (energy)is known. A mass measurement places the particle past the radius by adding to the mass of the hole. A momentum measurement causes the radius to shrink because the particle is not contributing mass to the hole. If it were contributing mass ,the hole would know and the uncertainty would be violated.(I know black holes aren't aware.)
Nov 07, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
No, the hole is not measuring anything. The reason there is uncertainty in measurements is due to the effect the measuring stick has on the particle. But because there is no such thing as a quantum of gravity, the particle is constantly adding to the local gravity field regardless of its position. There is absolutely no uncertainty being violated. The black hole doesn't need to measure the particle, and it doesn't need to know anything about the particle.
Besides, the uncertainty principle says you cant know momentum and position PERFECTLY at the same time. We are talking VERY small scales before the uncertainty principle would affect the reliability of measurements.
Nov 07, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Nov 07, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
It might be any thing you imagine it to be, and have the cahungas to propose, with an explanation as to your logic.
Can 'anything be' ? i think that's been answered with a resounding 'yes'.
But we still require reasoned evidence if our feeble minds have any chance at all of understanding these unimaginable concepts.
Nov 07, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
But if the BH is treated as mass with density just "approaching" infinity, then it would be actually (theoreticaly) possible - given the rotation speed of the BH (relative to its mass) is high enough to affect its shape / density distribution, up until the density in the middle is low enough to cause a "hole" in the center of the (normally very close to spherical) horizon, essentially resembling it to be of a torus/ring shape.
But given the density and horizon diameter of a SMB, it would possibly require rotational speeds approaching infinity for such a severe deformation of the horizon to actually happen..
Nov 08, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Yeah, that was what i was afraid someone would say. Makes sense. Thanks.
Nov 08, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Observations of objects circling the galactic center allow us to calculate that there is "something" there creating a gravity well strong enough to be an event horizon.
As to the structure question, our models fail us and we should keep an open mind that the "singularity" indicated by the failed models is probably a lack of understanding that would let us describe what it actually is.
It is too bad the term "gravistar" never caught on, as BH turn out to be anything but "black".
Nov 08, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
The theoretical Higgs particle is thought to be the mediator of mass. An Anti-Higgs particle source could in theory prop up the gravity well of a black hole. If you find a source of Anti-Higgs let me know ,I need some for the flux capacitor of the DeLorean.
Nov 09, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
We can see these monstrous jets of energy coming from a relative point source and there is nothing there at the source, you think magic is a more likely explanation? If black holes don't exist an even more strange explanation is required.
Also, like infinity, don't expect singularities to actually exist. Just because we can come up with concepts like infinity and a dimensionless point doesn't mean they exist in nature. And probably don't.
Nov 09, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Nov 09, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Nov 10, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
Nov 10, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Did you think that through quite much?
Nov 11, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
- Extraordinary Claims require extraordinary evidence -
Nov 12, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
IMHO only the latter case is truly skeptical.
Nov 14, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
bit difficult to follow this in the limited format we have, however, firstly, while I have an engineering degree, I do not consider myself anymore that a layman in these things. I guess my main worry about blackholes is the way these ideas came about. My understanding is that somewhere in the 60's-70's someone projected mathematically that stars could collapse to a dense state of matter so the idea of the neutron star was borne, this was followed by scaling this idea up to blackholes -> bigger stars etc. The trouble is that nowhere in this mathematical model was there any physical object which required these explanations and indeed the final model involves an infinity --- and indeed the concept gets more esoteric every month with new strange mathematical projections.
Today we use these mathematical models to explain all sorts of phenomena and call them blackholes etc.
Nov 26, 2010
Rank: 2 / 5 (3)
And something more - those metrics are good only on the outside of the object. Inside, it's every unclear what happens. So, don't take the idea for black holes so absolutely. It's only a model of an object that so far fits some of our observation. But then, any compact massive object will do that. Because we see only the mass and the rotation. Not the horizons.