Every person emits 2 tons of CO2 a year through eating

November 2, 2010

Every person emits 2 tons of CO2 a year through eating

Enlarge

Every person emits two tons of CO2 a year through eating. Credit: SINC

Every person emits the equivalent of approximately two tonnes of carbon dioxide a year from the time food is produced to when the human body excretes it, representing more than 20% of total yearly emissions. That is what a study by the Universidad de Almería says, confirming for the first time that human excrements contribute to water pollution, primarily with nitrogen and phosphorus.

A team of researchers from the Universidad de Almería (UAL) has estimated the environmental impact of the Spanish diet and role that human excrements play in the life cycle of . It is the first time that a scientific study of this type incorporates the role played by human excrements.

"Food in Spain produces emissions of around two tonnes of per person and per year (more than 20% of total emissions per person and per year) and consumes 20 gigajoules of primary energy," main author of the study and researcher at the UAL Iván Muñoz told SINC.

The study, which was published recently in The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, analyses the relationship of the food production and consumption chain with global warming and the acidification and eutrophication (excess of nutrients) of the environment, taking what a person in Spain ate in 2005 (881 kilograms) as a reference.

Calculations included agricultural and animal production, industrial food processing, sale and distribution, preparation and cooking at home, solid waste treatment (food remains and packaging), as well as human excretion.

According to the study, producing food from animals, such as meat and dairy products, causes the greatest impact. Agriculture, livestock, fishing and the food industry are the greatest source of carbon dioxide water pollution, but in both cases the effects of human excretion (through breathing or due to waste water treatment) are next on the list.

Human Excretion Contributes Nutrients

"Human excretion contributes significantly to water polluting through providing organic matter and nutrients, such as nitrogen and phosphorus, which fosters the growth of algae, a decrease in the level of oxygen dissolved in the water, bad smells and other problems associated to eutrophication," Muñoz says, "although such effects are minimised by the purification processes performed before wastewaters are discharged into rivers or to the coast."

The researcher makes the point that returning these wastewaters to the environment is not a bad thing in itself, as they are nutrients, just like manure is reused as fertiliser in agriculture.

"The problem is that in many cases our rivers have a very low water level and find it difficult to soak up wastewaters, not only from excrements, but also from other sources such as pesticides and fertilisers used in farming and pollutants from industry," Muñoz indicates.

The researchers have also estimated the CO2 and methane produced by the human metabolism and the energy consumption associated to aspects such as using toilet paper, soap and basin water, together with the treatment of sewage at treatment stations.

As regards emissions, "human excrements have a net null effect on global warming, as they are offset by carbon fixation in photosynthesis. As a result, they do not contribute to increasing the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere".

More information: Ivan Muñoz, Llorenç Milà i Canals y Amadeo R. Fernández-Alba. "Life cycle assessment of the average Spanish diet including human excretion". The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 15(8): 794-805, 2010. DOI:10.1007/s11367-010-0188-z

Provided by FECYT - Spanish Foundation for Science and Technology

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

dutchman
Nov 03, 2010

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
As a University of California lecturer once showed (with the data to prove the point) the best (and perhaps the only effective) solution to global warming is POPULATION (BIRTH) CONTROL, or zero population growth.

Of course, conservative religious groups don't want to hear this. To them, it is as if we still live in an age where most infants die early and the average life expectancy is 30. And where large groups of people were needed to tend to the fields and produce food.
marjon
Nov 03, 2010

Rank: not rated yet
As a University of California lecturer once showed (with the data to prove the point) the best (and perhaps the only effective) solution to global warming is POPULATION (BIRTH) CONTROL, or zero population growth.

Of course, conservative religious groups don't want to hear this. To them, it is as if we still live in an age where most infants die early and the average life expectancy is 30. And where large groups of people were needed to tend to the fields and produce food.

'Liberals' first. BTW they are going the way of the Shakers by not reproducing. Good riddance!
Slotin
Nov 03, 2010

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Well, that birth control.... Briefly speaking, you can control the population with controlling sex and this is the way, which "conservative religious groups" were quite effective in not so distant past.

Maybe we should reconsider the significance of the religion for population control in the human history. It was just the population control, based on strict prohibition of sex outside of marriage and every opportunity for visual stimulation of intercourse. The various expensive rituals connected with wedding prohibited the reproduction of people, who weren't sufficiently effective economically (men) or genetically (women) for having children.
mongander
Nov 06, 2010

Rank: not rated yet
Yes, yes, eugenics is the answer....but let's start slowly, exterminating the less desirables first.

"[Slavs, Latin, and Hebrew immigrants are] human weeds ... a deadweight of human waste ... [Blacks, soldiers, and Jews are a] menace to the race.

Eugenic sterilization is an urgent need ... We must prevent Multiplication of this bad stock." - Margaret Sanger, October 1926 Birth Control Review.
apex01
Nov 07, 2010

Rank: not rated yet
So i guess plants can't compensate for the extra CO2? Are we just suppose to starve ourselves or what?
Rank 3 /5 (8 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts

More news stories

Dragon makes history with space station docking

The private company SpaceX made history Friday with the docking of its Dragon capsule to the International Space Station, the most impressive feat yet in turning routine spaceflight over to the commercial ...

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created 2 hours ago | popularity 4.7 / 5 (3) | comments 0

Dragon arrives at space station in historic 1st (Update 2)

The privately bankrolled Dragon capsule made a historic arrival at the International Space Station on Friday, triumphantly captured by astronauts wielding a giant robot arm.

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created 9 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (7) | comments 8

NASA sees Hurricane Bud threaten western Mexico's coast

NASA satellites are providing rainfall, temperature, pressure, visible and infrared data to forecasters as Hurricane Bud is expected to make a quick landfall in western Mexico this weekend before turning back ...

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created 4 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

Typhoon Sanvu affecting Iwo To, then expected to fade over weekend

Infrared and visible imagery from NASA's Aqua satellite taken on May 25, 2012, showed an impressive Typhoon Sanvu already affecting the islands of Iwo To and Chichi Jima, Japan. The typhoon is expected to ...

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created 4 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

SKA super telescope to be built in Australia, South Africa (Update 2)

A long-running joust to host a radio telescope that would give mankind its farthest peek into the Universe ended on Friday with a Solomon-like judgement to split the site between Australia and South Africa.

Space & Earth / Astronomy

created 10 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (3) | comments 2


It's in the genes: Research pinpoints how plants know when to flower

Scientists believe they've pinpointed the last crucial piece of the 80-year-old puzzle of how plants "know" when to flower.

High-speed method to aid search for solar energy storage catalysts

Eons ago, nature solved the problem of converting solar energy to fuels by inventing the process of photosynthesis.

Researchers solve structure of human protein critical for silencing genes

In a study published in the journal Cell on May 24, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSHL) scientists describe the three-dimensional atomic structure of a human protein bound to a piece of RNA that "guides" the pr ...

Yahoo kills 'Livestand' just 6 months after debut

(AP) -- Yahoo is killing a tablet magazine called Livestand just six months its debut on the iPad.

Tongue analysis software uses ancient Chinese medicine to warn of disease

For 5,000 years, the Chinese have used a system of medicine based on the flow and balance of positive and negative energies in the body. In this system, the appearance of the tongue is one of the measures used to classify ...

Of mice and mental models: Neuroscientific implications of risk-optimized behavior in the mouse

(Medical Xpress) -- Regardless of an organism’s biological complexity, every encephalized animal continuously makes under-informed behavioral choices that can have serious consequences. Despite its ubiquity, ...