Massive galaxies formed when universe was young
The massive galaxy circled above was formed when the universe was still young, according to surprising findings from Tufts' Danilo Marchesini.
(PhysOrg.com) -- Some of the universe's most massive galaxies may have formed billions of years earlier than current scientific models predict, according to surprising new research led by Tufts University. The findings appear in the Astrophysical Journal published online Nov. 24 in advance of print publication on Dec. 10, 2010.
"We have found a relatively large number of very massive, highly luminous galaxies that existed almost 12 billion years ago when the universe was still very young, about 1.5 billion years old. These results appear to disagree with the latest predictions from models of galaxy formation and evolution," said Tufts astrophysicist Danilo Marchesini, lead author on the paper and assistant professor of physics and astronomy at the Tufts School of Arts and Sciences. "Current understanding of the physical processes responsible in forming such massive galaxies has difficulty reproducing these observations."
Collaborating with Marchesini were researchers from Yale University, Carnegie Observatories, Leiden University, Princeton University, the University of Kansas and the University of California-Santa Cruz.
The newly identified galaxies were five to ten times more massive than our own Milky Way. They were among a sample studied at redshift 3≤z<4, when the universe was between 1.5 and 2 billion years old.
Redshift refers to the phenomenon of a light wave stretching and moving toward longer wavelengths (the red end of the spectrum) as the emitting object travels away from an observer (Doppler Effect). This is similar to the pitch of a siren getting lower as the siren moves away. The redshift of distant galaxies is due to the expansion of the universe. The larger the redshift, the more distant the galaxy is, or the farther back in time we are observing. The larger the redshift, the younger the universe in which the galaxy is observed.
By complementing existing data with deep images obtained through a new system of five customized near-infrared filters, the researchers were able to get a more complete view of the galaxy population at this early stage and more accurately characterize the sampled galaxies.
Massive Galaxies Ferociously Active
The researchers made another surprising discovery: More than 80 percent of these massive galaxies show very high infrared luminosities, which indicate that these galaxies are extremely active and most likely in a phase of intense growth. Massive galaxies in the local universe are instead quiescent and do not form stars at all.
The researchers note that there are two likely causes of such luminosity: New stars may be forming in dust-enshrouded bursts at rates of a few thousand solar masses per year. This would be tens to several hundreds of times greater than the rates estimated by spectral energy distribution (SED) modeling. Alternatively, the high infrared luminosity could be due to highly-obscured active galactic nuclei (AGN) ferociously accreting matter onto rapidly growing super-massive black holes at the galaxies' centers.
There might be an explanation that would at least partially reconcile observations with model-predicted densities. The redshifts of these massive galaxies, and hence their distances, were determined from the SED modeling and have not yet been confirmed spectroscopically. Redshift measurements from SED modeling are inherently less accurate than spectroscopy. Such "systemic uncertainties" in the determination of the distances of these galaxies might still allow for approximate agreement between observations and model predictions.
If half of the massive galaxies are assumed to be slightly closer, at redshift z=2.6, when the universe was a bit older (2.5 billion years old) and very dusty (with dust absorbing much of the light emitted at ultra-violet and optical wavelengths), then the disagreement between observations and model predictions becomes only marginally significant.
However, the discovery of the existence of such massive, old and very dusty galaxies at redshift z=2.6 would itself be a notable discovery. Such a galaxy population has never before been observed.
"Either way, it is clear that our understanding of how massive galaxies form is still far from satisfactory," said Marchesini.
"The existence of these galaxies so early in the history of the universe, as well as their properties, can provide very important clues on how galaxies formed and evolved shortly after the Big Bang," he added.
More information: "The Most Massive Galaxies at 3.0 ≤Z<4.0 in the NEWFIRM Medium-Band Survey: Properties and Improved Constraints on the Stellar Mass Function," Astrophysical Journal, published online Nov. 24, 2010, in advance of Dec. 10, 2010 print edition; Vol. 725, Issue 1.
Provided by Tufts University
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
28 comments
-
Every black hole contains a new universe: A physicist presents a solution to present-day cosmic mysteries,
217 comments
-
New silicon memory chip developed,
16 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
41 comments
-
revamping general concept and cosmological principle
9 hours ago
-
Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
19 hours ago
-
Math behind Theoretical Physics
May 24, 2012
-
Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
May 23, 2012
-
Structure of the Milky Way?
May 20, 2012
-
What would it take to terraform Pluto and Charon?
May 19, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy
More news stories
Dragon arrives at space station in historic 1st (Update 2)
The privately bankrolled Dragon capsule made a historic arrival at the International Space Station on Friday, triumphantly captured by astronauts wielding a giant robot arm.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
12 hours ago |
5 / 5 (7) |
10
Dragon makes history with space station docking
The private company SpaceX made history Friday with the docking of its Dragon capsule to the International Space Station, the most impressive feat yet in turning routine spaceflight over to the commercial ...
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
5 hours ago |
4.8 / 5 (6) |
0
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isnt interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
13 hours ago |
4.8 / 5 (8) |
21
SKA super telescope to be built in Australia, South Africa (Update 2)
A long-running joust to host a radio telescope that would give mankind its farthest peek into the Universe ended on Friday with a Solomon-like judgement to split the site between Australia and South Africa.
13 hours ago |
5 / 5 (5) |
2
NASA sees Hurricane Bud threaten western Mexico's coast
NASA satellites are providing rainfall, temperature, pressure, visible and infrared data to forecasters as Hurricane Bud is expected to make a quick landfall in western Mexico this weekend before turning back ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
7 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
Of mice and mental models: Neuroscientific implications of risk-optimized behavior in the mouse
(Medical Xpress) -- Regardless of an organism’s biological complexity, every encephalized animal continuously makes under-informed behavioral choices that can have serious consequences. Despite its ubiquity, ...
It's in the genes: Research pinpoints how plants know when to flower
Scientists believe they've pinpointed the last crucial piece of the 80-year-old puzzle of how plants "know" when to flower.
High-speed method to aid search for solar energy storage catalysts
Eons ago, nature solved the problem of converting solar energy to fuels by inventing the process of photosynthesis.
Researchers solve structure of human protein critical for silencing genes
In a study published in the journal Cell on May 24, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSHL) scientists describe the three-dimensional atomic structure of a human protein bound to a piece of RNA that "guides" the pr ...
Landmark calculation clears the way to answering how matter is formed
(Phys.org) -- An international collaboration of scientists, including Thomas Blum, associate professor of physics, is reporting in landmark detail the decay process of a subatomic particle called a kaon ...
MIT researchers devise new means to synchronize a group of robots (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- For several years, roboticists have been working out ways to get a group of robots to perform synchronized activities as demonstrated most often in dance routines. Its not just about trying ...
Nov 24, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Nov 24, 2010
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (9)
Nov 25, 2010
Rank: 1.9 / 5 (12)
So what he's saying is that this observation once again falsifies the big bang theory. When will they let the thing die?
@jmcanoy1860: The claim for a young universe is that it's young within our own timeframe, created in six days and now approx. 6000 years old. However, due to gravitational time dilation effects, possibly billions of years of time would have passed as measured in the further reaches of the universe.
Furthermore, the researcher is saying that at 2.5 billion light years, we should be seeing younger looking stars and galaxies, not older, more mature items that look remarkably just like the rest.
If on the other hand all galaxies were created at the same time, but experienced time dilation as the universe was formed&stretched, you expect the light reaching us to now show those galaxies looking the same as all the others.
Nov 25, 2010
Rank: 4.2 / 5 (10)
You're completely clueless, aren't you?
Nov 25, 2010
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (9)
And kev, as usual, seizes on the statement of a possible disagreement between theory and observation and totally ignores the disclaimer: ""systemic uncertainties" in the determination of the distances of these galaxies might still allow for approximate agreement between observations and model predictions.". There's a lot of wiggle room in these figures, as the authors of this paper readily note and clearly further research is called for(spectroscopic redshifts, for starters).
A preprint of the paper is available here: http://arxiv.org/...69v2.pdf
Nov 25, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (6)
Nov 25, 2010
Rank: 4.2 / 5 (12)
You should read more than just the one book. Your comprehension will improve.
Nov 25, 2010
Rank: 1.9 / 5 (23)
Why make god more complicated than he needs to be? 'The simplest god that satisfies all the criteria must be the right one.' -Correct? Unless he has some sense of style that is, in which case who knows?
Nov 25, 2010
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (25)
Best to say 'He did it because it's there' like you end up doing anyway.
Nov 25, 2010
Rank: 1.4 / 5 (25)
The problem with all these models is, they're considering, our local place in universe is the youngest one, thus violating Copernican principle.
Nov 25, 2010
Rank: 1.4 / 5 (25)
http://www.physor...big.html
These religious trolls are simply ignoring the very first rule of science: experiment and/or observation always goes first. Should we consider such people as a proponents of science, after then?
Nov 25, 2010
Rank: 1.4 / 5 (21)
http://en.wikiped...sychosis
-Otto is no doctor, he only guesses. I understand this can affect either sex? Caused by hormonal imbalances-
Maybe vitamin D deficit then?
Nov 25, 2010
Rank: 1.3 / 5 (6)
The cosmos is fragmenting from neutron repulsion, rather than coalescing to fuse H => He => C => . . . Fe
See: "On the cosmic nuclear cycle and the similarity of nuclei and stars", Journal of Fusion Energy 25 (2006) 107-114 and http://www.youtub...yLYSiPO0
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo
Nov 27, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Nov 27, 2010
Rank: 1.9 / 5 (12)
The simplest explanation is, the Big Bang never happened at global scale and these galaxies are evaporating and dissolving all the time like giant fluctuations of dense gas. We just cannot see the very distant galaxies, because this environment disperses light wave like foggy air. But if we could come closer to Hubble deep field, a number of new galaxies would emerge - and many other galaxies would disappear in CMBR noise instead. Our local perspective is therefore similar to experience of tramp traveling through landscape under haze.
Nov 27, 2010
Rank: 3.4 / 5 (8)
When there is an actual reason. Which may or may not ever happen. In any case the galaxies are definitely more that 6000 or so light years away so they still don't fit your fantasy world.Which doesn't fit ANY evidence. Thus it is falsified.No. There is absolutely no evidence to support either that or a 6000 year old world.
More
Nov 27, 2010
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (9)
No. We expect them to look younger than the close galaxies as the light has traveled farther.
By the way how do you reconcile the Flood with the total lack of evidence for it. When was it in your opinion? Funny how you don't seem to have an answer.
Ethelred
Nov 27, 2010
Rank: 3.9 / 5 (9)
I pointed this out before and you just pretending it never happened.
Ethelred
Nov 28, 2010
Rank: 3.6 / 5 (7)
I don't mind getting ones from a Crank.Especially when that is the GOOD part when dealing with you.
I saw on the video you had that utterly irrelevant chart of isotopes again. It still shows exactly the same it always has. Larger mass atoms need MORE neutrons to be stable than low mass atoms.
IF neutrons REPELLED each other then atoms would be have to have LESS neutrons to be stable. The pile of iron in India would have PROVED you correct IF you had not been wrong.
Only a Crank would rather rant and rave and pass out ones instead of deal with these facts.
And that boy that did the video should know better than to have anything to do with you.
Ethelred
Nov 29, 2010
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
If it quacks like a duck.... So what if it changes the current worldview. It is about time some basic principles are re-examined.
Dec 02, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Dec 03, 2010
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
How? The given galaxy is at a single distance from us. So we can only see it at a single time. By how, I mean without faster than light travel. If we had that THEN we could look at galaxies at different times.
Ethelred
Dec 03, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
I know it will take a bit of effort since Barkan gives a well deserved one for nearly every post but you earned it.
You earned several actually.
Ethelred