Hidden costs of applying to medical school will deter poorer students

Nov 03, 2010

The costs of a medical school application may deter young people from poorer backgrounds from applying to medical school, argue a father and daughter in an article published in the British Medical Journal today.

In the UK, medical students are 4.5 to 7.2 times more likely to come from the wealthier socio-economic groups 1-3 than 4-7, write Professor Terence Stephenson, president of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, and Lucy Stephenson, a medical student.

Selection to a medical course should not depend on the applicants' financial status. However, with "grade inflation" at A level, choosing between applicants can involve other criteria that may depend on ability to pay, they say.

They calculate that the activities required as part of the selection process for many medical courses comes to over £1,600.

The costs include travel to attend UKCAT and BMAT exams, and a residential course to familiarise applicants with the medical career and the complex application process, and to have interview coaching and guidance.

It also includes the cost of attending six open days, as far afield as Exeter and Edinburgh, and an average of two interviews, usually accompanied by one or both parents. If offered a place, students may also pay for vaccinations essential to commencing the course.

Adding all these costs together comes to £1609.60, they say.

But this figure doesn't include non-academic activities, such as music, sport, or work experience that can also influence whether an applicant is offered a place, but that often require significant financial assistance over many years.

They also point out that a school pupil from a poor background may have a part-time job evenings and weekends in addition to their four A level subjects competing for their time and resources.

They conclude: "In addition to the greater opportunity that professional parents have to arrange appropriate work experience, and the lesser debt aversion of wealthier families ( finish the course with average debts of £35,000), the costs described here may further disadvantage young people from poorer backgrounds in the process of selection for medical school."

Explore further: Strategies can help docs lower their tax burden

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Mom and dad as financial advisors

Jul 27, 2009

Why are so many students deep in debt before they finish college, only to take on more debt as they begin their careers? The answer may be found by looking at the social forces that shape the attitudes and behaviors of today's ...

Recommended for you

The human race evolved to be fair for selfish reasons

23 hours ago

"Make sure you play fairly," often say parents to their kids. In fact, children do not need encouragement to be fair, it is a unique feature of human social life, which emerges in childhood. When given the o ...

Non-stop PET/CT scan provides accurate images

Sep 18, 2014

Siemens is improving PET/CT imaging and data quality while reducing radiation exposure. The Biograph mCT Flow PET/CT scanner is a new positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) system that, ...

Experts: Chopin's heart shows signs of TB

Sep 17, 2014

The preserved heart of composer Frederic Chopin contains signs of tuberculosis and possibly some other lung disease, medical experts said Wednesday.

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Nov 03, 2010
All evidence that we have shifted to live in economic apartheid (ie separate development and opportunities depending upon wealth) societies.
not rated yet Nov 03, 2010
Added to this fact is those 'economically advantaged' students tend to be cheaters ? This is evidenced by a computer program designed to catch cheaters. They used this program to go through historic records of present day doctors in North Virginia. They had to quit the study because SO MANY doctors' were found out to have cheated that if they continued they would destroy the medical system in Virginia. Now morally should they have continued as opposed to QUITTING ? the investigation ?