Learning to read is good for the brain

Nov 12, 2010 by Lin Edwards report
Activation specific to ex-illiterates during sentence reading. For more details, see the original publication: Science, DOI:10.1126/science.1194140

(PhysOrg.com) -- A new study from researchers in Europe has found literacy improves brain function even in people who learn to read as adults.

Cognitive neuroscientist Stanislas Dehaene from the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Medicale in Gif-sur-Yvette in France and colleagues from Belgium, Brazil and Portugal, used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to study the brains of 63 adults, of whom 10 were illiterate, 22 learned to read as , and 31 who learned to read as children.

They found the brains of subjects who were literate showed more vigorous responses to written words in brain regions known to process visual information and in areas of the left temporal lobe, which is known to respond to spoken language. These changes were seen in both groups of literate people.

Reading and writing have been human activities for only around 5,000 years, which is not long enough for major evolutionary changes. The ability to read therefore is likely to lie in brain circuits that originally evolved for other purposes, and the new study suggests these circuits evolved in support of spoken language.

There is something of a trade-off however, as the illiterate volunteers used a larger area of the left occipital-temporal cortex region of the brain to respond to images of faces than in the literate subjects. This may mean literate people are less adept at recognizing faces, and experiments are underway to see if this is true.

The new study follows on from earlier research by psychologist Marcel Just from Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh that showed 100 hours of remedial training for children who were poor readers resulted in a corresponding growth of the white matter fibers in the frontal lobe of the brain. White matter is the brain tissue that transports signals between regions of gray matter where information is processed. As the children improved at reading the amount of increased and its efficiency also improved.

Just’s research was the first to demonstrate that repeated cognitive exercises altered the cortical connectivity in the human . In other words, learning to better basically re-wired the children's brains.

Explore further: Physically fit kids have beefier brain white matter than their less-fit peers

More information: How Learning to Read Changes the Cortical Networks for Vision and Language, Stanislas Dehaene et al., Published Online November 11, 2010. Science, DOI:10.1126/science.1194140

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Celebrities in 'Ice Bucket Challenge' to fight disease

1 hour ago

Steven Spielberg, Justin Bieber and Bill Gates are among many celebrities pouring buckets of ice water over their heads and donating to fight Lou Gehrig's disease, in a fundraising effort that has gone viral.

Study helps explain why elderly have trouble sleeping

3 hours ago

As people grow older, they often have difficulty falling asleep and staying asleep, and tend to awaken too early in the morning. In individuals with Alzheimer's disease, this common and troubling symptom ...

Targeted brain training may help you multitask better

4 hours ago

The area of the brain involved in multitasking and ways to train it have been identified by a research team at the IUGM Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal and the University of Montreal.

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

kaasinees
not rated yet Nov 12, 2010
Where do all these "no shit sherlock" articles come from?
rgwalther
not rated yet Nov 12, 2010
Duhhh???? Being dead slows learning.
Ruhal_Hazim
5 / 5 (2) Nov 12, 2010
I don't think the point of this is just that reading is good for the brain, as any learning of novel complex cognitive activity could be deemed "good" for the brain, but more precisely how reading is good for the brain. We get a better picture of where increases in activity lie and what differences are in the brains of literate vs. illiterate individual, and, perhaps a window into why that particular pathway is active to begin with and what is the broader picture in that activity.