Fermi telescope discovers new giant structure in our galaxy (w/ Video)
From end to end, the newly discovered gamma-ray bubbles extend 50,000 light-years, or roughly half of the Milky Way's diameter, as shown in this illustration. Hints of the bubbles' edges were first observed in X-rays (blue) by ROSAT, a Germany-led mission operating in the 1990s. The gamma rays mapped by Fermi (magenta) extend much farther from the galaxy's plane. Credit: NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center
(PhysOrg.com) -- NASA's Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope has unveiled a previously unseen structure centered in the Milky Way. The feature spans 50,000 light-years and may be the remnant of an eruption from a supersized black hole at the center of our galaxy.
"What we see are two gamma-ray-emitting bubbles that extend 25,000 light-years north and south of the galactic center," said Doug Finkbeiner, an astronomer at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Mass., who first recognized the feature. "We don't fully understand their nature or origin."
The structure spans more than half of the visible sky, from the constellation Virgo to the constellation Grus, and it may be millions of years old. A paper about the findings has been accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal.
Finkbeiner and Harvard graduate students Meng Su and Tracy Slatyer discovered the bubbles by processing publicly available data from Fermi's Large Area Telescope (LAT). The LAT is the most sensitive and highest-resolution gamma-ray detector ever launched. Gamma rays are the highest-energy form of light.
Other astronomers studying gamma rays hadn't detected the bubbles partly because of a fog of gamma rays that appears throughout the sky. The fog happens when particles moving near the speed of light interact with light and interstellar gas in the Milky Way. The LAT team constantly refines models to uncover new gamma-ray sources obscured by this so-called diffuse emission. By using various estimates of the fog, Finkbeiner and his colleagues were able to isolate it from the LAT data and unveil the giant bubbles.
This video is not supported by your browser at this time.
When an electron moving near the speed of light strikes a low-energy photon, the collision slightly slows the electron and boosts the photon's energy to the gamma-ray regime. Credit: NASA Goddard
Scientists now are conducting more analyses to better understand how the never-before-seen structure was formed. The bubble emissions are much more energetic than the gamma-ray fog seen elsewhere in the Milky Way. The bubbles also appear to have well-defined edges. The structure's shape and emissions suggest it was formed as a result of a large and relatively rapid energy release - the source of which remains a mystery.
One possibility includes a particle jet from the supermassive black hole at the galactic center. In many other galaxies, astronomers see fast particle jets powered by matter falling toward a central black hole. While there is no evidence the Milky Way's black hole has such a jet today, it may have in the past. The bubbles also may have formed as a result of gas outflows from a burst of star formation, perhaps the one that produced many massive star clusters in the Milky Way's center several million years ago.
"In other galaxies, we see that starbursts can drive enormous gas outflows," said David Spergel, a scientist at Princeton University in New Jersey. "Whatever the energy source behind these huge bubbles may be, it is connected to many deep questions in astrophysics."
Hints of the bubbles appear in earlier spacecraft data. X-ray observations from the German-led Roentgen Satellite suggested subtle evidence for bubble edges close to the galactic center, or in the same orientation as the Milky Way. NASA's Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe detected an excess of radio signals at the position of the gamma-ray bubbles.
The bubbles display a spectrum with higher peak energies than the diffuse gamma-ray glow seen throughout the sky. In addition, the bubbles display sharp edges in Fermi LAT data. Both of these qualities suggest that the structure arose in a sudden, impulsive event. Credit: NASA/DOE/Fermi LAT/D. Finkbeiner et al.
The Fermi LAT team also revealed Tuesday the instrument's best picture of the gamma-ray sky, the result of two years of data collection."Fermi scans the entire sky every three hours, and as the mission continues and our exposure deepens, we see the extreme universe in progressively greater detail," said Julie McEnery, Fermi project scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md.
NASA's Fermi is an astrophysics and particle physics partnership, developed in collaboration with the U.S. Department of Energy, with important contributions from academic institutions and partners in France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Sweden and the United States.
"Since its launch in June 2008, Fermi repeatedly has proven itself to be a frontier facility, giving us new insights ranging from the nature of space-time to the first observations of a gamma-ray nova," said Jon Morse, Astrophysics Division director at NASA Headquarters in Washington. "These latest discoveries continue to demonstrate Fermi's outstanding performance."
Provided by
NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
28 comments
-
Every black hole contains a new universe: A physicist presents a solution to present-day cosmic mysteries,
215 comments
-
New silicon memory chip developed,
16 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
41 comments
-
Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
11 hours ago
-
Math behind Theoretical Physics
May 24, 2012
-
Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
May 23, 2012
-
Structure of the Milky Way?
May 20, 2012
-
What would it take to terraform Pluto and Charon?
May 19, 2012
-
Whats is volume of mass at the centre of the sun
May 19, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy
More news stories
Dragon arrives at space station in historic 1st (Update 2)
The privately bankrolled Dragon capsule arrived at the International Space Station for a historic docking Friday, captured by astronauts wielding a giant robot arm.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
4 hours ago |
5 / 5 (6) |
6
Astronauts capture SpaceX's Dragon for station dock
Astronauts aboard the International Space Station reached out and caught SpaceX's Dragon capsule for docking at the orbiting lab on Friday in a historic first for commercial spaceflight.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
2 hours ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
SKA super telescope to be built in Australia, South Africa (Update 2)
A long-running joust to host a radio telescope that would give mankind its farthest peek into the Universe ended on Friday with a Solomon-like judgement to split the site between Australia and South Africa.
6 hours ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
2
SAfrica stops short of being disappointed over SKA verdict
South Africa stopped short of expressing disappointment after it failed to win the bid to single-handily host the world's most powerful radio telescope.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
2 hours ago |
1 / 5 (2) |
0
Get ready for the transit of Venus
Scientists and amateur astronomers around the world are preparing to observe the rare occurrence of Venus crossing the face of the Sun on 5-6 June, an event that will not be seen again for over a hundred years.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
6 hours ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
Skp2 activates cancer-promoting, glucose-processing Akt
HER2 and its epidermal growth factor receptor cousins mobilize a specialized protein to activate a major player in cancer development and sugar metabolism, scientists report in the May 25 issue of Cell.
Math predicts size of clot-forming cells
UC Davis mathematicians have helped biologists figure out why platelets, the cells that form blood clots, are the size and shape that they are. Because platelets are important both for healing wounds and in strokes and other ...
Early physical therapist treatment associated with reduced risk of healthcare utilization and reduced overall healthcare
A new study published in Spine shows that early treatment by a physical therapist for low back pain (LBP), as compared to delayed treatment, was associated with reduced risk of subsequent healthcare utilization and lower ...
Pancreatectomy OK without downstaging from therapy
(HealthDay) -- Pancreatectomy improves median survival in pancreatic cancer patients even when presurgical neoadjuvant therapy does not lead to radiographic downstaging of tumors, according to a study published ...
Flesh-Eating bacteria no cause for panic, experts say
(HealthDay) -- Despite scary headlines by the score, most people don't have to fear that they'll be the next victim of the so-called flesh-eating bacteria disease, experts say.
Of mice and mental models: Neuroscientific implications of risk-optimized behavior in the mouse
(Medical Xpress) -- Regardless of an organism’s biological complexity, every encephalized animal continuously makes under-informed behavioral choices that can have serious consequences. Despite its ubiquity, ...

Nov 09, 2010
Rank: 4 / 5 (2)
Nov 09, 2010
Rank: 1.1 / 5 (35)
Reality is fractioning of a singular system (nuclear decay). Neutrinos are not the end of this equation nor is the universe the beginning of this equation.
Reality is very much infinite (open ended) even though the universe itself is not.
Although the equation is infinite our view is not. We set parameters. The Universe is the upper limit while the Planck is the lower limit. These are the fractions that currently hold relativity. This view will soon expand.
Nov 09, 2010
Rank: 2.4 / 5 (16)
Nov 09, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
Nov 09, 2010
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
Nov 09, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
1 (local/observable?) universe mass = 10^11 galactic mass = 10^22 stelar mass = 10^80 proton mass = 10^160 neutrino mass
Maybe better now? Although I'm quite sure those numbers are not very accurate either, but that was not the point..
Drop the "singularities", define what you mean by "universal" and realize that an "atom" is quite a broad term. Then rethink/rephrase it and try again :)
Not really an equation - but more like a concept - like fractal universe. However, the "universe" bit of it needs to be properly defined (localized) before it can be written like that. Saying "the universe is not everything" is just logicaly incorrect.
Nov 09, 2010
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
Nov 09, 2010
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
What would a really well done photoshop look like?
Nov 09, 2010
Rank: 1.4 / 5 (10)
No. Neutron repulsion [http://db.tt/yxaIAGN] prevents the formation of black holes.
Neutron repulsion powers the Sun [http://db.tt/wj4lCR3] and the cosmos. It causes fragmentation of heavy nuclei, stars and galactic centers.
Jets are also reported from the poles of neutron stars.
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Nov 10, 2010
Rank: 1.3 / 5 (4)
There are many surprises about our cosmos yet to be revealed and understood.
Nov 10, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
I wonder if it is a common effect. I understand that it evaded observation in our own galaxie by being shrouded and drown in the statistic noise, but own would expect to reveal such phenomena more easier on viewing other galaxies from the side? or do again statistic filtering have to be tweaked again to reveal our new reality?
Nov 10, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Nov 10, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (7)
Nov 10, 2010
Rank: 3.9 / 5 (7)
No. Aether and electric universe are diametrically opposed. Zephir wouldn't preach electric universe.Since it came up, the fractal universe idea is just about the dumbest idea I've ever heard of. The reason for this is because we've discovered that fractals cannot innovate. Sure they look different from one to another however in their basic function and calculation there is very little variance in the basic construction of the item. Fractal objects cannot evolve, they're locked into an infinity of sameness. I don't think fractals would ever be an apt or descriptive model of the Universe, or multiverse depending on your preferred terminology. Neutrons do not repel, they decay. They do not repel on decay.
Nov 10, 2010
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (8)
1. "The sun's origin, composition and source of energy", in Lunar and Planetary Science XXIX, Abstract 1041, available as 1041-pdf from Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, TX (CD-ROM, 2001)
2. "Attraction and repulsion of nucleons: Sources of stellar energy", J. Fusion Energy 19, 93-98 (2001).
3. "Nuclear systematics: III. The source of solar luminosity", J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 252, 3-7 (2002).
4. "Neutron repulsion confirmed as energy source", J. Fusion Energy 20, 197-201 (2003).
5. "The structure of the solar core", Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Beyond Standard Model Physics - BEYOND 2003 (IOP, Bristol, editor: H. V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, 2004). etc., etc.
6. "The Sun is a plasma diffuser that sorts atoms by mass", Physics of Atomic Nuclei 69, 1847-1856 (2006).
7. "Earth's heat source - the Sun", Energy & Environment 20, 131-144 (2009)
3.
Nov 10, 2010
Rank: 1.1 / 5 (20)
When most of matter is evaporated, the white hole will change into dark collapsar with exception of polar jets, where event horizon is not fully closed yet. These jets are behaving like giant fountains, which transform galaxy into its typical flat shape. When all excessive matter is evaporated, the central collapsar will change into calm black holes and the gallaxy will change into red elliptical galaxy.
I presume, the most lightweight particles, like the positrons and (anti)neutrinos are emanated from poles of collapsars for longest time, so we can see their evidence even by now. Actually we should detect such clouds around most of galaxies of medium age.
Nov 10, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (6)
As I surmise you already know, such insight opens the way to the correlation between the scalar differentials of matter, vortice & dark energies, and the co-planar phase differentials of probability within infinite existance.
This Gamma projection discovery is sure to open a few doors. When differential probabliistic limits of relevence and significance replace our tendancy toward convenient, finite absolute constants, the new model will mark an epoch of synergistic dimensions.
I hope to see a more elegant, realistic myopia of the standard model in my lifetime thanks to like propagations and opinions.
-Tony
(MrBrainerpop-Where-ever you go, there you are)
Nov 10, 2010
Rank: 1.3 / 5 (7)
"No. Aether and electric universe are diametrically opposed. Zephir wouldn't preach electric universe."
That's not entirely true. The concept of Aether was ruled out by Einstein's theories alone. The EU doesn't draw lines like he did, and the concept of Aether is still under consideration- one concept being a sea of neutrinos in their most collapsed form, which would allow waves to propagate across space.
Anyway, the 'bubbles' of our galaxy with 'defined edges' will eventually resolve into the shape of an hourglass. The bubbles are where the Z-pinch is occuring in the dusty plasma filament that powers our galaxy and are entering a discharge mode due to the increase in current density.
That last bit is my thesis, at any rate. It stands to reason this will prove true since we see it occur with planetary nebulae, which are smaller versions of galactic pinches, and plasma phenomena are entirely scalar.
Mike H.
Nov 10, 2010
Rank: 1.1 / 5 (18)
The balance of repulsive electrostatic forces and attractive gravity is the equilibrium, which has been ignored in most of cosmological models - and it's still completely classical model, which doesn't violate anything, what we know about Universe.
Nov 10, 2010
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
Are you familiar with electric universe theory, or are you jsut trying to pump aether on me?
Nov 10, 2010
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (25)
Haha! Fractals cannot innovate? What did the hydrogen atom innovate in the last 14 billion years? Hahaha! In your opinion the fractal universe is just about the dumbest idea you've ever heard of. Go sit by the garbage.
Ps. When particles decay where do you think the product goes? It radiates away from the particle (radiation). Radiation repels. Not sure if you are aware, probably not, the universe is expanding at an ever increasing rate. All particles are repelling energetically, while mass draws them together. Electroweak force is decay.
Seriously, go sit by the garbage, that's where you belong.
Nov 10, 2010
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (6)
And to answer your question as you asked, Helium. No, it is simplistic and inaccurate when compared to observation. Aether is the dumbest idea I've ever heard of.No thanks, but I'll take your pet theories out there as I pass by.
Nov 10, 2010
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (25)
Nov 10, 2010
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (19)
http://apod.nasa....ermi.jpg
Nov 10, 2010
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (8)
You are right. The universe fragments and expands.
Neutron repulsion seems to be the driving force. That will be the subject of Part 3 of this video series: http://www.youtub...e_Qk-q7M
This older video also explains neutron repulsion: http://www.youtub...90qlChHY
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA PI for Apollo
Nov 10, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Nov 11, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Nov 11, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Nov 13, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
A = the number of times articles published in
B = the total number of "citable items"
impact factor = A/B
The impact factor of the by you referenced papers:
Impact Factor: 0.784 (2009)
http://www.spring...al/10894
Impact Factor: 0.631 (2009)
http://www.spring...geHeader
J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem
Impact Factor: 0.539 (2009)
http://www.spring...geHeader
Nov 13, 2010
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (6)
The new video on neutron repulsion should be completed and posted tomorrow.
The last video showed evidence that the interior of the Sun is composed mostly of Fe, O, Ni, Si, S. Mg and Ca - just like planet Earth and ordinary meteorites.
http://www.youtub...=related
You may want to view it first.
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo
Nov 14, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
1. Prior to the 50's, space was considered to be a vacuum populated largely with matter in the solid, liquid and gaseous states. Nobody expected that our probes would be barraged with charged particles everywhere they went. Nowadays, nearly every astrophysical textbook starts out in the introduction explaining that 99% of what we see with our telescopes is matter in the plasma state. This should have inspired a dramatic shift in our theories for the universe, and yet it did not.
2. In the laboratory, plasmas within the presence of an electromagnetic field can ignore gravity with less than 1% ionization.
3. We know that space is permeated by magnetic fields. In the laboratory, a sustained magnetic field in a plasma requires an electric current to cause it.
4. Gerrit Verschuur observes interstellar filaments which exhibit the same critical ionization velocities that we see in the laboratory.
Nov 14, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
Anthony Peratt can create a spiral galaxy with perfect rotational characteristics using nothing more than electromagnetic plasmas.
Laboratory plasma physicists observe plasma beams to naturally emit (synchrotron) microwaves every day. The CMB can be easily explained with laboratory plasma physics if we fund it. Gerrit Verschuur's papers validate Hannes Alfven's CIV prediction, explaining how it is that the CMB can come at us from all directions.
Hannes Alfven -- the very man who helped create MHD -- has distanced himself from treating cosmic plasmas as though their behavior is dictated by gravity. He, for instance, called the frozen-in magnetic field concept "pseudo-pedagogical".
People need only open their eyes to the world outside of conventional wisdom to get the big picture.
Nov 14, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
Plasma cosmology was created by a Nobel laureate, Hannes Alfven.
It remains under investigation by a former adviser to the Dept. of Energy and z-machine researcher, Anthony Peratt.
Observations which support it and which validate Alfven's CIV predictions have been made by one of the world's premier radio astronomers, Gerrit Verschuur.
The universe can be made to work just fine without hypothetical, invisible particles like dark matter and energy.
Those who would prefer to imagine what plasmas do, rather than infer their astrophysical behavior from laboratory observations, are not practicing science.
There is no philosophy in cosmology or astrophysics anymore. There is only the consensus view, and a complete failure to consider any competing ideas -- and even as those ideas are performing fantastically.
Nov 14, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
Our scientists and theorists are ignoring ideas which they were not taught in school because they were instead taught assumptions about the behavior of cosmic plasmas which do not support these alternate explanations. At what point do they have a burden to question these assumptions?
The answer is at the point of the inferential step in every single peer-reviewed paper published in the astrophysical journal. The notion that we can solve the great mysteries of the universe by assuming just one framework -- the conventional theories -- is in fact a dangerous gamble. There is no philosophy in this approach. This is humans falling in love with the first idea that they learned about. It is not a scientific approach, because science demands a methodology that can accommodate competing ideas which demonstrate predictive capabilities.
Nov 14, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
The average density of the Sun is about 1.4 times (1.4gm/cm3) that of water. Earth has a average density of 5.5gm/cm3.
I understand that "iron rain" is a predecessor to stellar collapse.
1) How can the Sun have a core, of any appreciable size, composed of these heavy elements, with such a low avg. density?
2) Is it me, or does your neutron repulsion theory cause (produce) the same measured nuclear by-products as Hydrogen Fusion, 4 1H + 2 e --> 4He + 2 neutrinos + 6 photons?
Nov 14, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Nov 14, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
1.) The solar core is a neutron star.
2.) Neutron repulsion generates solar luminosity, solar neutrinos, and solar wind Hydrogen in the proportions observed.
2a.) Neutron-emission generates ~60% of solar luminosity.
2b.) Neutron-decay generates ~5% of solar luminosity;100% of solar-wind H.
2c.) H-fusion generates ~35% of solar luminosity: ~100% of solar neutrinos.
I will post a new video tomorrow, "Scientific Genesis: 3. Neutron Repulsion."
Nov 15, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
omatumr:
Forgive Shootist for not having all the details of your fantasy star's structure memorized. However, since it is generally agreed that the density of a neutron star approaches that of an atomic nucleus, far outstripping the density of the aforementioned heavy elements, you weaseled your way out of answering a question with merit. So here it is again, modified to more closely match your model of the sun.
How can the Sun have a core, of any appreciable size, composed of neutrons AND surrounding this core a layer containing heavy metals, and still have such a low avg. density?
Nov 15, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Nov 15, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Nov 15, 2010
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (5)
Can anybody explain how it is that this theory of black holes can ever possibly be disproven? The theory is just changed to suit the observations each time that a new enigmatic observation is made. Does anybody really think that this somehow represents the scientific method?
What ever happened to theories which make accurate predictions? What ever happened to philosophy of science?
Those who advocate ignoring a plasma-based cosmological explanation also ignore the implications of this approach: By permitting the assumptions of the conventional gravity-based theories to become unquestioned as the sole framework for interpreting observations, they are treating assumptions about the behavior of cosmic plasmas as unquestionable facts.
At some point, it became heresy to build plasma models in the lab
Nov 15, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
http://www.msnbc....40152463
It is so nice to not be confused by old models that don't stand up anymore.
Nov 15, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Once again fails to answer a simple question.