FDA would boost food inspections under Senate bill

Nov 29, 2010 By MARY CLARE JALONICK , Associated Press
In this Nov. 16, 2010 file photo, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nev., gestures during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington. The Food and Drug Administration would have to step up inspections of food processors under legislation the Senate is expected to pass this week. The bill, which has stalled in that chamber for more than a year, would give the FDA authority to order a recall of tainted products. Today, the agency must negotiate with sellers of tainted food to do a voluntary recall. The bill would also require food manufacturers and farms to follow stricter standards to keep food safe. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File)

The Food and Drug Administration would have to step up inspections of food plants under legislation the Senate is expected to pass this week.

The bill, which has stalled in that chamber for more than a year, would give the FDA authority to order a recall of tainted products. Today, the agency must negotiate with sellers of tainted food to issue a voluntary recall. The bill would also require and farms to follow stricter safety standards.

Supporters say passage is critical in the wake of large-scale outbreaks of salmonella and E. coli in peanuts, eggs and produce. Those outbreaks have exposed a lack of resources and authority at the FDA as the embattled agency struggled to contain and trace the contaminated products. The agency rarely inspects many food facilities and farms, visiting some every decade or so and others not at all.

The bill would emphasize prevention so the agency could try to stop the outbreaks before they begin.

Despite wide bipartisan support, the legislation stalled as it came under fire from advocates of buying locally produced food and operators of small farms, who say it would could bankrupt some small businesses. Senators agreed before Congress left for Thanksgiving to exempt some of those operations from costly food safety plans required of larger companies.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. got an agreement to move the legislation by allowing Republicans to offer amendments not relevant to the bill. Oklahoma Sen. Tom Coburn is expected to offer an amendment to place a moratorium on spending for "earmarks," or pet projects in lawmakers' states and districts, and Nebraska Sen. Mike Johanns could offer another to repeal an arcane business tax reporting provision of the health overhaul passed earlier this year.

Democratic Sen. Max Baucus of Montana, the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, will also offer an amendment on the health tax provision. The Senate is expected to begin voting on the amendments Monday.

Whether the safety bill can make it to the president's desk during the brief lame-duck congressional session is unclear since the House passed a different version of the legislation in 2009. Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin, the sponsor of the bill, said he has agreement from some members in the House to take up the Senate bill if it is passed.

Explore further: Consumers largely underestimating calorie content of fast food

not rated yet
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Admin. official: FDA to inspect large egg farms

Aug 28, 2010

(AP) -- The Food and Drug Administration is planning to inspect all of the country's largest egg farms before the end of next year following the massive recall of tainted eggs linked to a salmonella outbreak ...

FDA: only 2 egg farms so far show salmonella

Aug 23, 2010

(AP) -- Food and Drug Administration officials said Monday that there is no evidence a massive outbreak of salmonella in eggs has spread beyond two Iowa farms, though a team of investigators is still trying ...

House approves FDA regulation of tobacco products

Apr 02, 2009

(AP) -- The federal government would for the first time have regulatory powers over the tobacco industry under a bill the House approved Thursday after years of campaigning by anti-smoking forces.

Senators dig in on massive health care legislation

Jun 17, 2009

(AP) -- Eye-popping new cost estimates for President Barack Obama's plan to overhaul the U.S. health care system are forcing majority Democrats to scale back their plans to subsidize coverage for the uninsured.

Recommended for you

About one in four uninsured could be excluded from ACA

2 hours ago

(HealthDay)—More than one in four of those eligible for new premium assistance tax credits under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) do not have a checking account and will not be able to receive premiums from ...

Keep summer water fun safe with training and supervision

7 hours ago

Fun in the summer often means kids spending time in the water, whether at a pool, the beach, a lake or river. A pediatric safety expert at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) stresses proper training ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

A2G
1 / 5 (1) Nov 29, 2010
Guess who pays for this extra protection? Thanks for thinking us, Senator. At least the food will be safe, even if no one will be able to afford it. Bigger and bigger government every day. The FDA does not work for the American people. It is mostly the lap dog of big pharma. Anyone who just does a little reading can figure this out fairly quickly. But the FDA is sold to the American people as being there to help us. How many years have people survived without the government looking over our shoulder at every turn? Now in the last 30 years the FED wants us to believe we are doomed if big brother doesn't take care of us.
A2G
1 / 5 (1) Nov 29, 2010
Next up, home inspections to make sure you cook your eggs properly. Then the FED will fine you if you didn't properly sanitize your cutting board. I have dealt with agent from the FDA in the medical business. Think of a government agent who doesn't begin to understand what they are looking at and yet has the power to stop your business in its tracks. The government is ruining America. The people of America are brilliant, hard working people, but our government is placing so many unnessary burdens on the backs of people, I don't know how much longer the US will survive. Go back and look at the photo of the good senator. DO you really want this guy making decisions for you?
A2G
1 / 5 (1) Nov 29, 2010
Our company was making products in the US without a single complaint from any user. The FDA stepped in and shut down the business. Why? Because our product was about to drastically affect the profits of big pharma. So we were forced to move out of the US to continue production. Four years later still not one complaint anywhere in the world about our products and great results to boot. So I ask you mister senator, what good did the FDA do for the American people in this case? Zero. With the loss of many American jobs and lack of access to our company's products that would have saved the American tax payer ten of millions of dollars. The American people are brilliant, but the US government is totally corrupt.

More news stories

Facial-recognition technology proves its mettle

(Phys.org) —In a study that evaluated some of the latest in automatic facial recognition technology, researchers at Michigan State University were able to quickly identify one of the Boston Marathon bombing ...