Dead zones in Gulf caused, in part, by farm drainage

Nov 24, 2010 By Krishna Ramanujan
Tile drainage system flowing into a drainage ditch between agricultural fields in east-central Illinois in early spring before the crop has emerged.

(PhysOrg.com) -- The tile drainage systems in upper Mississippi farmlands -- from southwest Minnesota to across Iowa, Illinois, Indiana and Ohio -- are the biggest contributors of nitrogen runoff into the Gulf of Mexico, reports a Cornell/University of Illinois-Urbana study.

Nitrogen runoff has been identified as a major contributor to dead zones in the Gulf, where fertilizes algae and causes it to bloom, which in turn, depletes oxygen from the water and suffocates other life forms over thousands of square miles each summer.

Tile drainage has greatly increased yields in fertile soils since the 1800s where there once were wetlands. The systems consist of burying perforated pipes under the soil and draining them into canals. When such fields are fertilized, more nitrogen runs off into the Mississippi River watershed, according to the study.

"A lot of tile drainage is being installed, but we don't know where and how much," said Laurie Drinkwater, associate professor of horticulture, a co-author of the paper recently published in the . Mark David, a biogeochemist at the University of Illinois, is the paper's lead author.

"Given the pivotal role of tile drainage in transporting from agricultural fields to streams and rivers, we need to consider some form of regulation if we expect to reverse hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico," Drinkwater added.

To estimate nitrogen inputs and outputs, the researchers constructed a database that included 1977-2006 data on corn, soybeans and other crops, livestock and manure, fertilizer inputs, atmospheric deposition of nitrogen and human populations for 1,768 counties within the entire Mississippi River basin. The database also included nitrate concentrations and their flow into streams and rivers from 153 watersheds where data was available over the same time period.

These data were then entered into a computer model designed to show nitrate yields for every county in the Mississippi River basin. The results revealed that the dominant source of nitrogen loss into the Mississippi came from fertilized cornfields on tile-drained watersheds in the upper Mississippi River basin, along with areas in southeastern Missouri and northeastern Arkansas.

Atmospheric nitrogen and animal manure were not found to have a significant effect on nitrogen yields into the Mississippi, though human sewage did add small additional nitrogen inputs.

To reduce such runoff, solutions include installing wetlands in areas where tiles drain to biofilter the water and fertilizing fields in the spring instead of the fall. Also, "we know that we are losing nitrogen in the period between cash crops when nothing is growing in the field," said Drinkwater. "If we plant winter cover crops and diversify crop rotations, nitrogen losses could be reduced quite a lot." A 2006 study by Drinkwater's research group found that, on average, cover crops reduced nitrogen leaching by 70 percent.

Drinkwater added that policymakers need to increase incentives that reward environmentally beneficial farming practices. Currently, direct payments to farmers focus on production outcomes and do not sufficiently emphasize environmental stewardship, she added.

The covers 40 percent of the continental United States and is the largest producer of corn and soybeans in the world.

Explore further: 93 percent of mining, oil and gas, logging, agriculture developments involve inhabited land

Related Stories

Tile drainage directly related to nitrate loss

Sep 27, 2010

Tile drainage in the Mississippi Basin is one of the great advances of the 19th and 20th centuries, allowing highly productive agriculture in what was once land too wet to farm. In fact, installation of new ...

Switchgrass lessens soil nitrate loss into waterways

Aug 09, 2010

By planting switchgrass and using certain agronomic practices, farmers can significantly reduce the amount of nitrogen and nitrates that leach into the soil, according to Iowa State University research.

Alternative farming cleans up water

Jul 19, 2007

Although the addition of nutrients to soil helps to maximize crop production, fertilizer can leach nutrients, polluting the water supply. A recent study by researchers at the University of Minnesota shows alternative cropping ...

Cropland diversity reduces nitrogen pollution

Feb 11, 2009

LSU researchers have identified a link between the diversity of crops grown in farmlands and the pollution they create in lakes and rivers. In a Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment e-View paper, these ecologists show t ...

How much nitrogen is too much for corn?

Apr 23, 2007

North Carolina State researchers recently discovered a test that quickly predicts nitrogen levels in the humid soil conditions of the southeastern United States. These scientists report that the Illinois Soil Nitrogen Test ...

Recommended for you

Does it help conservation to put a price on nature?

1 minute ago

Putting a price on the services which a particular ecosystem provides may encourage the adoption of greener policies, but it may come at the price of biodiversity conservation. Writing today in the journal ...

Reef-builders with a sense of harmony

1 hour ago

Cold-water corals of the species Lophelia pertusa are able to fuse skeletons of genetically distinct individuals. On dives with JAGO, a research submersible stationed at GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, scientists ...

Selling and buying water rights

6 hours ago

Trying to sell or buy water rights can be a complicated exercise. First, it takes time and effort for buyers and sellers to find each other, a process that often relies on word-of-mouth, local bulletin boards, ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Jonseer
1 / 5 (1) Nov 25, 2010
The easiest huge first step towards fixing this, breech the dykes AFTER New Orleans and allow the river to once again replenish the delta with its load of sediment, now taken and dropped of the continental shelf via the overextended mouth of the river maintained by dikes.

While the amount of sediment is far less than Europeans first saw the river, it still carries enough to reverse much of the erosion. Testing was completed years ago and proved this true.

Marshes deltas are nature's natural water purifiers.

A marsh replenished with that sediment would be able to extract most of the nutrients that cause the dead zone using the nutrients to create biomass that would rebuild the marsh solving two problems at once.

There is no reason for the dikes today, other that since the dikes are there, they are maintained.

Without the dikes, New Orleans would still be a major port. They aren't essential for that, dredging is.

Ditching the dikes could solve most of the problem if not all.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.