CT screening reduces lung-cancer deaths in heavy smokers

November 19, 2010 By Jim Dryden

(PhysOrg.com) -- Studying heavy smokers, the National Cancer Institute’s 33-center National Lung Screening Trial found that significantly fewer who were screened with low-dose CT scans died from lung cancer than heavy smokers screened with standard chest X-rays.

The study involved more than 53,000 people in the United States, including more than 3,800 participants at the Washington University School of Medicine and Barnes-Jewish Hospital.

David S. Gierada, MD, professor of radiology at the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, directed the study at the Washington University site. He says it already was known that low-dose CT could detect abnormalities in the lung at much earlier stages than a standard X-ray, but until now, it wasn’t known whether using the more sensitive screening technique could help prevent lung cancer deaths. This study, he says, answered that question.

“The patients who were randomized to be screened with the low-radiation dose CT had 20 percent fewer deaths than the group randomly selected to receive chest X-rays,“ Gierada says.

The video will load shortly

Lung cancer is the No. 1 cancer killer in the United States, claiming more lives than the next three most deadly cancers combined. This year, more than 220,000 people in the United States will be diagnosed with lung cancer, and more than 157,000 will die from the disease.

Smokers in the study had used cigarettes for at least 30 “pack years.” That is, they smoked an average of at least one pack per day for 30 years. They were between 55 and 74 years old when they were enrolled in the study. Subjects received screening exams for three consecutive years during the study.

“It was well-known before the trial even started that CT scans could detect tumors when they were much smaller than can be detected by chest X-ray,” Gierada says. “But what wasn’t known with certainty was whether detecting cancers at that small size would translate into a reduced number of deaths.”

He says one potential drawback to using low-dose CT scans involve false positives. The scans detect a number of abnormalities in the lung that are not cancerous, and when that happens, more extensive follow-up testing is required, which can be expensive, cause anxiety and may, in some cases, even lead to surgical interventions for abnormalities that turn out not to be malignant. But Gierada says in spite of those potential drawbacks, the study clearly demonstrates that low-dose CT screening can reduce the risk of deaths.

“I think the results are pretty clear,” he says.

Explore further: CT screening improves lung cancer survival

Related Stories

CT lung cancer screening no cure-all for smokers

June 10, 2008

Screening for lung cancer with computed tomography (CT) may help reduce lung cancer deaths in current and former smokers, but it won't protect them from other causes of death associated with smoking, according to a new study ...

Study: CT scans modestly cut lung cancer deaths

November 4, 2010

(AP) -- A special type of CT scan can detect lung cancer early enough to save some lives, the National Cancer Institute announced Thursday - the first evidence that a screening test may help fight the nation's top cancer ...

Recommended for you

How the finch changes its tune

August 3, 2015

Like top musicians, songbirds train from a young age to weed out errors and trim variability from their songs, ultimately becoming consistent and reliable performers. But as with human musicians, even the best are not machines. ...

Cow embryos reveal new type of chromosome chimera

May 27, 2016

I've often wondered what happens between the time an egg is fertilized and the time the ball of cells that it becomes nestles into the uterine lining. It's a period that we know very little about, a black box of developmental ...

Shaving time to test antidotes for nerve agents

February 29, 2016

Imagine you wanted to know how much energy it took to bike up a mountain, but couldn't finish the ride to the peak yourself. So, to get the total energy required, you and a team of friends strap energy meters to your bikes ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.