BP failed to learn from past 'near misses': oil spill panel

Nov 17, 2010
Ships work near the site of the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico off the coast of Louisiana in August 2010. Oil giant BP's "insufficient consideration of risk" and "lack of operating discipline" contributed to the biggest oil spill in US history, The Wall Street Journal said, citing a report by technical experts.

BP's failure to learn from past "near misses" and its "insufficient consideration of risk" were major factors in the oil well blowout that led to the biggest US environmental disaster, a panel of US scientists concluded on Wednesday.

The report -- the most comprehensive examination so far of the massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico -- also found that numerous technical and operational breakdowns contributed to the Deepwater Horizon oil rig explosion and the massive spill from the Macondo well.

The preliminary study released Wednesday by a committee of experts from the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) faulted BP and its contractors for having failed to learn from earlier problems, and said that proper checks and balances might have prevented the disaster.

"Important decisions made to proceed toward well abandonment despite several indications of potential hazard suggest an insufficient consideration of risks," said Donald Winter, former secretary of the Navy and chairman of the study committee.

US Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar, who in May commissioned the report, said the document provides a useful guidepost on how officials can improve safety in the oil drilling industry.

"Their independent, science-based analysis of what went wrong in the lead up to the blowout will help guide our continuing efforts to raise the bar for safety and oversight of offshore oil and gas operations, and will be of assistance to other ongoing investigations," Salazar said in a statement.

The document was released by the NAS's National Academy of Engineering, a private, nonprofit group which offers technical advice to the US government.

The group criticized failures by federal officials regulators tasked with overseeing oil drilling entities in the Gulf, including the US Minerals Management Service and other regulatory agencies.

"Flawed decisions were not identified or corrected by BP and its service contractors, or by the oversight process" the NAS panel said.

Though the report said that possible causes for the spill require further investigation, it cited BP and its contractors working on the oil well that exploded on April 20 and triggered the disaster, for a "lack of management discipline."

The panel also faulted their "lack of onboard expertise and of clearly defined responsibilities" and "insufficient checks and balances."

The engineering panel said however that that there are many unanswered questions about the disaster and said it "may not be possible to establish the precise failure mechanism" that triggered the blowout of BP's wellhead, which gushed nearly five million barrels of oil into the sea.

The report also pins some blame on the offshore oil industry as a whole, noting that industry-wide training standards are "relatively minimal" compared to other high-risk industries.

Several non-technical factors also likely contributed to the disaster, it said, including insufficient training of key staff aboard the BP-leased Deepwater Horizon rig and federal regulators' lack of expertise.

The authors did not reach conclusions on why a key set of valves known as the blowout preventer failed to shut down the well and prevent the blast.

Forensic analysis is just beginning to get under way for the device, recovered recently from the Gulf floor.

The committee's final report is due out in June 2011.

Explore further: Pact with devil? California farmers use oil firms' water

Related Stories

US sets up security zone around BP oil spill site

Oct 28, 2010

A security zone has been set up around the site of the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico to safeguard any evidence of the environmental disaster earlier this year, the Justice Department said Wednesday.

BP removes cap from plugged well in Gulf of Mexico

Sep 02, 2010

BP on Thursday removed a massive cap which had stemmed the flow of oil from its ruptured well deep in the Gulf of Mexico in a key step toward killing the well once and for all, officials said.

Experts question BP's take on Gulf oil spill

Sep 27, 2010

(AP) -- Engineering experts probing the Gulf of Mexico oil spill exposed holes in BP's internal investigation as the company was questioned Sunday for the first time in public about its findings.

BP accused of trying to silence science on spill

Jul 23, 2010

The head of the American Association of Professors accused BP Friday of trying to buy the silence of scientists and academics to protect itself after the Gulf oil spill, in a BBC interview.

Recommended for you

Gimmicks and technology: California learns to save water

Jul 03, 2015

Billboards and TV commercials, living room visits, guess-your-water-use booths, and awards for water stinginess—a wealthy swath of Orange County that once had one of the worst records for water conservation ...

Cities, regions call for 'robust' world climate pact

Jul 03, 2015

Thousands of cities, provinces and states from around the world urged national governments on Thursday to deliver a "robust, binding, equitable and universal" planet-saving climate pact in December.

Will climate change put mussels off the menu?

Jul 03, 2015

Climate change models predict that sea temperatures will rise significantly, including in the tropics. In these areas, rainfall is also predicted to increase, reducing the salt concentration of the surface ...

As nations dither, cities pick up climate slack

Jul 02, 2015

Their national governments hamstrung by domestic politics, stretched budgets and diplomatic inertia, many cities and provinces have taken a leading role—driven by necessity—in efforts to arrest galloping ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Nov 17, 2010
So why should they be any different than another 'group'? We are smart as some individuals, but all groups are stupid. We, as a species, ALWAYS wait for the disaster to react. We are by nature, in groups reactive, not proactive. That's why efforts to stop global warming will fail, there are too many stupid people clamoring to enforce their stupid opinions.

It is 100.0000% inevitable that something will happen sooner or later that we will NOT be able to react to and fix and that will be all she wrote. Unless we start telling stupid people to shut the hell up and become proactive as a species we are doomed, whether it's global warming, the environment, nuclear war, pandemic, asteroids, something wicked this way comes.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.