Americans getting shorter, wider

Nov 01, 2010 by Vansh Muttreja, Duke University
Americans are getting shorter and wider

Americans are falling behind in the global height race as well.

“Height trends reveal hidden aspects of economic and social growth,” said Professor John Komlos, chair of the Institute of Economic History at the University of Munich, during his talk here on Thursday entitled “Economics and Human Biology: Why are Americans shorter and fatter?"

Americans were the tallest people in the world during the colonial times and the Industrial Revolution. However, over time, their physical stature has gradually diminished, and now they are one of the shortest populations among all the advanced nations.

“There are three significant periods of interest in this study- Contemporary United States, Industrial Revolution and Antebellum United States.”

Height is a historical record of health and nutrition until age 20, and is an important indicator of biological well being, Komlos said. Eighty percent of a person’s height from conception till the age of 20 depends on genetics, while the other 20 percent depends on external factors. “It is this 20 percent which leads to the differences in heights from region to region.”

During the Colonial times, were the tallest in the world. In the case of the Industrial Revolution and the Antebellum Era, the heights of people in the industrialized countries were shrinking even when the average incomes were increasing.

“Total average height decreased during these periods; however this was not the case if you consider only the richer people. This was primarily because they were able to pay for their nutrition even when the prices of food were going up.”

Thus, according to Komlos, income and other money measures do not completely reveal the well being of a nation. “Standard of living is multidimensional. Height, health and happiness are outcome measures of welfare, which are better and more direct than income.”

His research showed that the average height of the Dutch increased by almost 8 inches since the middle of the 19th century, compared to an increase of just 2 inches in the height of Americans.

A family’s socio-economic status, externalities in the society and regional economy and nutrient use are some factors that affect a person’s .

“Americans are shorter because of the existence of inequality in the society, an uninsured safety net that is not as strong as that in other advanced nations, less robust health care system, and a poorer diet.”

These factors also explain why Americans are relatively fatter compared to their modern counterparts.

“Lack of consumer protection, bias towards the present (instant gratification), overindulgence, lack of will power and countervailing abilities, are other reasons for these anomalies.”

Explore further: Singaporeans defy ban on e-cigarettes

More information: To read more about John Komlos’ anthropometric history, follow this link.

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Black women in the U.S. appear to be shrinking, data show

Dec 26, 2008

Call her The Incredible Shrinking African-American Woman. In an age when the adult populations of most industrialized nations have grown significantly taller, the average height of black women in the U.S. has been receding, ...

Consumer confidence hits five-year high in Michigan

Oct 27, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- Despite Michigan’s continued economic malaise, residents’ optimism about the future is at its highest in nearly five years, according to Michigan State University’s latest State of the State ...

Recommended for you

Singaporeans defy ban on e-cigarettes

1 hour ago

Singaporeans are defying a ban on electronic cigarettes despite stiff fines for distributors and smugglers, health authorities said Friday.

Sensors may keep hospitalized patients from falling

22 hours ago

(Medical Xpress)—To keep hospitalized patients safer, University of Arizona researchers are working on new technology that involves a small, wearable sensor that measures a patient's activity, heart rate, ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

CarolinaScotsman
not rated yet Nov 01, 2010
His research showed that the average height of the Dutch increased by almost 8 inches since the middle of the 19th century, compared to an increase of just 2 inches in the height of Americans.

What was the total height at the beginning and end for both countries, not just the total change? Were the Dutch shorter and then caught up? Have they passed the Americans? How equal were the two groups then and now?
david_42
not rated yet Nov 01, 2010
The Dutch are currently the tallest people in the world. The men average 6.7 cm taller than American men. So, we can conclude that they were 12 cm shorter 100 years ago and surpassed the US.

http://en.wikiped...n_height
ajt62
not rated yet Nov 03, 2010
There's a RACE? I'm short (5'3"), always have been, and I'm just fine with that. Is that a deformity? An anomaly? Something wrong with being short?
Slotin
1 / 5 (3) Nov 03, 2010
The ratio between sexual and asexual reproduction is of evolutionary origin and its adjusted dynamically with respect to optimal length of reproduction cycle and frequency of mutagenesis. The stable wealthy living conditions lead to diminishing of sexual dimorphism, escalation of cancer and asexual forms of reproduction (infertility, endiometriosis). The snowball period in precambrium initiated the evolution of sexual reproduction. This is energetically expensive, but it enables to mutate faster in a reaction to unstable life environment. For example, many protozoa are breeding asexually in wealthy living conditions and they're shrinking in size during this, because of shorter generation cycle and absence of predators and mating concurrence. The sharks at the bottom of oceans are protected against environmental changes, so they're breeding asexually. We still should still understand better various evolutionary feedbacks, which are hardwired in our genes.
Slotin
1 / 5 (3) Nov 03, 2010
On the other hand, the phylogenesis observed should be cleaned from demographic trends, for example from increasing immigration from East Asia countries, where people are smaller in general.
jmcanoy1860
not rated yet Dec 07, 2010


@Slotin Good idea. With both the Hispanic and the Asian immigration (these being the greatest in number) that could account for average height differences. Of course, neither of these population is known for obesity which is the other metric being evaluated.

More news stories

Google+ boss leaving the company

The executive credited with bringing the Google+ social network to life is leaving the Internet colossus after playing a key role there for nearly eight years.