Action on climate change cannot wait for a global deal, business leaders say

Nov 17, 2010
Action on climate change cannot wait for a global deal, business leaders say

Business leaders of hundreds of companies from around the world yesterday released a renewed demand for “an ambitious, robust and equitable global deal on climate change”, adding that businesses are already investing in a low-carbon future and governments must respond to this by both redoubling efforts to secure an international framework but also by pursuing an ambitious “parallel mitigation strategy”.

The statement - known as The Cancun Communiqué - is an initiative of the Prince of Wales's Corporate Leaders Group on Climate Change - a cross-sectoral group of major international businesses working with the University of Cambridge to call for more ambitious action to tackle climate change.

The Communiqué was presented by corporate leaders from the group to European Commissioner for Climate Action, Connie Hedegaard, and the Ambassador of Mexico to the EU, H.E. Sandra Fuentes-Berain in Brussels yesterday, Tuesday, 16 November. They were joined by Ambassadors and Government Representatives from the European Parliament, Australia, Canada, Japan, India, South Africa, Turkey, UK, and US.

Speaking ahead of the event Commissioner Hedegaard said: "Major investments are needed to develop a low-carbon economy and for Europe to continue to lead in this field. This will require a continued involvement of the private sector, along with ambitious and proactive interventions by governments. I am happy to see that business leaders sincerely care about climate change, and also identify new business opportunities. It is indeed in Europe's own economic and industrial interest to keep ourselves in pole position on the way to a low-carbon economy."

She was joined by Ambassador Fuentes-Berain who added: "Mexico strongly believes in the need for a world with a new and efficient global policy on Climate Change. This is why we have deployed all our diplomatic skills to reach a fair and comprehensive agreement in Cancun, with the aim of overcoming the North-South divide. Good policy should make economic sense for countries and the private sector to reduce their carbon footprint."

This is part of a series of events to present the Communiqué to decision makers around the world and invite further support from the business community. Similar events have occurred or are already scheduled in Brazil on 9th November, USA on 16th November, South Africa on 19th November, Korea on 23rd November, Japan on 10th December. The Cancun Communiqué will be presented to world leaders at COP16 on 5 December.

The Cancun Communiqué is the successor to previous communiqués such as the Bali, Poznan, and Copenhagen Communiqués. The Cancun Communiqué has already secured the support of more than 250 companies based in over 36 countries, and is expected to gather much more support before UN negotiators meet in Cancun, on 29th November.

Communiqué signatories include some of the world's largest companies and best known brands in the energy, professional services, transport, technology, manufacturing, telecommunications and banking sectors from countries including the EU, Mexico, US, Japan, Australia, Canada, Brazil, India, China and South Africa.

The Communiqué restates the business case for a strong and effective UN climate framework as laid out in previous communiqués. It argues that scientific evidence for action is overwhelming and an international framework is vital to deliver such action at the required scale. But the Communiqué differs from other statements made on the UN negotiations by arguing that governments should not wait for success in the negotiations but should also pursue other actions in parallel.

Such actions include new sectoral, bilateral or regional agreements, and should be focussed in five key areas:

1. Energy efficiency in all sectors
2. Low carbon energy systems
3. Emissions capture and storage
4. Emissions from other greenhouse gases
5. Urban planning, land-use management and land-use change.

The companies that have signed the Communiqué believe that: "the risk of inaction on climate change is far greater than the cost of investing today" and that an ambitious, robust and equitable deal is the right way to both respond to and stimulate economic recovery.

Explore further: 3Qs: Game theory and global climate talks

More information: The full text and list of signatories can be found at: www.cancuncommunique.com

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

EU sticks to 20-percent carbon cuts

Oct 29, 2010

The European Union on Friday gave notice it was not prepared to go beyond a planned 20-percent cut in greenhouse-gas emissions ahead of next month's UN climate talks in Cancun, Mexico.

UN: No comprehensive climate deal this year

May 03, 2010

(AP) -- Outgoing U.N. climate chief Yvo de Boer shot down expectations of a climate treaty this year, saying Monday that a major U.N. conference in December would yield only a "first answer" on curbing greenhouse ...

Climate talks appear to slip backward

Aug 06, 2010

(AP) -- Global climate talks appeared to have slipped backward after five days of negotiations in Bonn, with rich and poor countries exchanging charges of reneging on agreements they made last year to contain greenhouse ...

Delegates told to ID achievable goals on climate

Oct 04, 2010

(AP) -- The U.N. climate chief urged countries Monday to search faster for common ground on battling climate change so that a year-end meeting in Mexico can produce results in that fight.

US envoy: Climate deal still possible in Mexico

Oct 22, 2010

(AP) -- A global agreement to curb carbon emissions is possible at an upcoming U.N. climate conference but hinges on the efforts and political will of countries, the U.S. climate envoy Todd Stern said Friday ...

Recommended for you

3Qs: Game theory and global climate talks

Nov 21, 2014

Last week, China and the United States announced an ambitious climate agreement aimed at reducing carbon emissions in both countries, a pledge that marks the first time that China has agreed to stop its growing emissions. ...

From hurricanes to drought, LatAm's volatile climate

Nov 21, 2014

Sixteen years ago, Teodoro Acuna Zavala lost nearly everything when Hurricane Mitch ravaged his fields, pouring 10 days of torrential rains on Central America and killing more than 9,000 people.

Nicaragua: Studies say canal impact to be minimal

Nov 20, 2014

Officials said Thursday that studies have determined a $40 billion inter-oceanic canal across Nicaragua will have minimal impact on the environment and society, and construction is to begin next month.

User comments : 7

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

omatumr
3 / 5 (2) Nov 24, 2010
The "Prince of Wales's Corporate Leaders Group on Climate Change" are entitled to their opinions, but Al Gore's "Inconvenient Truth" is unfortunately a convenient untruth for politicians trying to seize tyrannical control of the population.

See: www.youtube.com/w...=related

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo
marjon
5 / 5 (2) Nov 24, 2010
Why can't these businesses act?

Maybe they can't make money unless govts skew the markets for them.
If 'green' was so good, they wouldn't need govt subsidy.
omatumr
3 / 5 (2) Nov 25, 2010
Why can't these businesses act?

Maybe they can't make money unless govts skew the markets for them.
If 'green' was so good, they wouldn't need govt subsidy.


You are right! The world economy is already collapsing and they want governments to fund "fairy tale" solutions.
marjon
5 / 5 (2) Nov 25, 2010
Why can't these businesses act?

Maybe they can't make money unless govts skew the markets for them.
If 'green' was so good, they wouldn't need govt subsidy.


You are right! The world economy is already collapsing and they want governments to fund "fairy tale" solutions.

If the US govt followed its constitution, businesses would know they are on their own in the marketplace. The truly wise businesses will do what they can to stay away from all govt coercion.
GSwift7
1 / 5 (1) Nov 26, 2010
All I can say is "thank god" cap and trade didn't pass here in the US before the elections. Now it's effectively dead for at least the next six years, and they know it. People like Gore and Obama, who have already invested millions in hopes of making billions on carbon brokering, stand to lose those millions of risky investment unless they can somehow force it to happen without Congressional support. I just hope that this delay will buy us enough time for the science to tell the true story about climate change. As more and more evidence starts to pile up, anyone who's been exagerating or lying is going to find things start to become a little uncomfortable in public. I think it's funny how certain studies are held back until after elections. Have you noticed some of the studies that were released since the first week of November? lol.
omatumr
3 / 5 (2) Nov 26, 2010
A new book, ‘Slaying the Sky Dragon: Death of the Greenhouse Gas Theory’, may help end this scheme!

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
One of the co-authors
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo
GSwift7
1 / 5 (1) Nov 29, 2010
The sample chapters of that book are a nice selection. Of course it isn't anything new to anyone who cares to read information from both sides of the argument. Those points have been known to be true for quite a long time and people still don't want to hear them. Most people just "know" that pollution is destroying the planet. They want to "do something" to help. The greenhouse gas warming theory provides everything they need to fulfill their emotional needs. As pointed out in the book you mentioned, good science questions itself and seeks out any evidence that it is not correct. The evidence that GHG theory is wrong is so simple and obvious that I can come to no conclusion about why supposedly reputable organizations continue to support it. The only explanations are ignorance and corruption. In a hundred years, this whole thing will go down in history as the biggest scam of all time, and the science community will reel from the backlash. That is the real trajedy here.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.