Study finds voters blind to their own biases

Oct 21, 2010
Study's hypothetical ballots

(PhysOrg.com) -- When people are asked to judge poorly filled-out ballots in an attempt to determine voter intent, their vision becomes unconsciously clouded by partisan bias.

Some times every vote really does count. In November 2008 in Minnesota, for example, the U.S. Senate race between incumbent Republican Norm Coleman and Democratic challenger Al Franken was so close that the state was forced to determine intent on thousands of ballots that had been filled out incorrectly.

But can you accurately determine voter intent? A soon-to-be published study has found that when people judge poorly filled-out ballots in an attempt to determine voter intent, their vision becomes unconsciously clouded by partisan bias. This finding highlights the difficulty that election officials -- the people in charge of judging ballots -- have in viewing such ballots objectively.

Peter Ubel, a professor of marketing and public policy at Duke University and lead author of the study, said people of all political stripes are blind to their own . This, he says, helps explain why we live in an increasingly polarized political environment, and why it is so difficult to agree on who has won close elections.

In the study, Ubel and University of Michigan professor Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher presented hypothetical ambiguous ballots to 899 Minnesota residents and asked them to judge voter intent before indicating who they had actually voted for in the 2008 U.S. Senate election. In all four ballots, respondents who voted for Coleman were significantly less likely to award an ambiguous vote to Franken. The exact same pattern was observed in reverse for Franken supporters.

"This finding raises fundamental questions about the ability of people to evaluate ambiguous ballots in a neutral manner, and goes a long way toward explaining why it is so difficult to resolve close elections in ways that satisfy all participants," notes the paper, which is to be published in January in the journal PS: Political Science and Politics.

"The election in Minnesota was essentially a tie, with the ultimate outcome depending on many decisions about which votes to count, and who to award those votes to. Our study demonstrates that many of these decisions are susceptible to unconscious partisan bias. design, and the methods of awarding disputed ballots, should be revised to account for such unavoidable biases.

"Fortunately, it is possible to design ballots in a way that overcomes these biases," the authors write. "Ballot design, and the methods of awarding disputed ballots, should be revised to account for such unavoidable biases."

Explore further: When rulers can't understand the ruled

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Protect your vote -- avoid election machine errors

Nov 03, 2008

Of all the conceivable problems that could lead to a miscount Election Day, there's one possibility that voters can do something about – avoid making election machine-related errors, says a University of ...

College students vote smarter than expected

Oct 01, 2009

College students make strategic choices about where to vote, most prefer absentee ballots, and they are especially likely to vote absentee if their homes are in swing states, according to a new Northwestern University study ...

Voters confused by e-voting technologies

Jan 28, 2008

A study led by the University of Maryland suggested that electronic U.S. voting technologies are efficient but too many voters ask for help too often.

Early voting option can decrease turnout, research shows

Nov 17, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- Although states are moving quickly to put in place election procedures that allow for early voting, allowing people to cast ballots ahead of Election Day often results in lower turnout, according to research ...

Recommended for you

When rulers can't understand the ruled

13 hours ago

Johns Hopkins University political scientists wanted to know if America's unelected officials have enough in common with the people they govern to understand them.

When casualties increased, war coverage became more negative

17 hours ago

As the number of U.S. casualties rose in Afghanistan, reporters filed more stories about the conflict and those articles grew increasingly negative about both the war effort and the military, according to a Penn State researcher. ...

Poll surveys residents of two war-torn African nations

22 hours ago

Researchers fanned out in one of the most dangerous corners of the globe late last year, asking residents of a brutalized part of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) their thoughts on violence, security, ...

Drunk driving women treated differently than men

22 hours ago

A study by Victoria University of Wellington's Health Services Research Centre explores attitudes and behaviours surrounding women and drink-driving, and the extent to which they have changed over the past decade.

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Vendicar_Decarian
2 / 5 (4) Oct 21, 2010
In America the public are so dumbed down that the ability to do long division without a calculator is an uncommon skill as is addition and subtraction without a pencil and paper.

It comes as no surprise to anyone that Americans find themselves incapable of counting ballots.
Noumenon
2.3 / 5 (3) Oct 22, 2010
Another ignorant caricature. That's why America rules the planet I guess right?
Vendicar_Decarian
3 / 5 (2) Oct 22, 2010
"That's why America rules the planet I guess right?" - Noumenon

America doesn't even rule America. Perhaps you haven't noticed.

Modernmystic
2.3 / 5 (3) Oct 22, 2010
The funniest thing about this is that some idiots will read a piece like this and assume it only applies to Americans. Like Americans are more biased in their opinions than say Europeans. I find quite the opposite to be true...in fact Americans tend to be more apathetic than Europeans in their political opinions in my experience.
Flakk
5 / 5 (1) Oct 22, 2010
In America the public are so dumbed down that the ability to do long division without a calculator is an uncommon skill as is addition and subtraction without a pencil and paper.

It comes as no surprise to anyone that Americans find themselves incapable of counting ballots.


0/10
nice try Troll