Refining the search for what's 'out there'

Why should aliens who outclass us to the degree we outclass mice want to talk to us? Only civilizations at our (temporary, pre-Singularity) level might want to, but probably cannot or will not due to expense.

Why should aliens who outclass us to the degree we outclass mice want to talk to us?

Why do humans study mice?

All of these perspectives are based on Earth, with human social models, human problems, and human solutions.

We have no legitimate way of predicting the behavior of a life-form so fundamentally foreign to us, and our entire biosphere.

We have no legitimate way of predicting the behavior of a life-form so fundamentally foreign to us, and our entire biosphere.

I understand what you mean, but I don't totally agree. If they've evolved in a plantery biosphere then there ought to be similarities. They would have had to compete with other animals, find food and shelter. They're likely to be social and cooperative rather then solitary (otherwise high technological development would be unlikely). They must have likes, dislikes and preferences which motivate them. They must be able to predict behaviours of others and of the physical world. They would use material resources which would have costs or value. In short, these are concepts we're familiar with and can understand. The details and implementation will be different for sure, but to say that we can't predict anything about them is too pessimistic.

If course, if they're an artificial, self-modifying species (robotic), then all bets are off...

Thankyou DamienS, succinct.

If you go with the probabilities, you say yes there is an EVIL race and also GOOD races out there. Seeing as we are one of them are we GOOD or EVIL. If we are GOOD we would have heard from others...(probabilities) but seeing as we havent we must conclude by Sherlockingen wisdom that we are EVIL.

I must say then...we come in peace..shoot to kill..shoot to kill ...

(I laughed too..the captains log...)

I also proposed the point to point communication a long time ago on another forum, but oh well some people have all the luck and attention.

Why would anything bother sending a signal 1000 light years? What's the point?

Why would anything bother sending a signal 1000 light years? What's the point?

For the sake of argument, suppose you were a ridiculously advanced, benevolent alien, and suppose you thought there were other intelligent, benevolent aliens in the universe who might benefit from your knowledge...

As an example, the U.S. basicly gives away all our technology anyway, so maybe the aliens are like that too. This seems unlikely, but is still possible.

If it is a type 2 civilization, they might be sharing technology or astronomical information with other colonies within their own species.

You might say, it's 1000 light years, surely the other planet would make the same discovery by the time the signal got there anyway. Not necessarily. Native Americans were like 2000 years behind Europeans and Middle easterners during the age of exploration and the colonial period. Technological discovery isn't guarantted, so communication is still worth it...

Not necessarily. Native Americans were like 2000 years behind Europeans and Middle easterners during the age of exploration and the colonial period.

That's not accurate. Other than the use of Iron and Steel, technologically they two sides were not much different in what they knew about the world. Iron was a huge leap due to durability and usefulness as a tool.

Not necessarily. Native Americans were like 2000 years behind Europeans and Middle easterners during the age of exploration and the colonial period.

That's not accurate. Other than the use of Iron and Steel, technologically they two sides were not much different in what they knew about the world. Iron was a huge leap due to durability and usefulness as a tool.

So...astronomy, scientific method, chemistry, physics, the beginnings of industrialization....

The Europeans AND the Eastern civilizations knew a hell of a lot more about the world than native Americans beyond the use of iron and steel.

Did you read your history off the back of a cracker jack box?

So...astronomy, scientific method, chemistry, physics, the beginnings of industrialization....

The beginnings of industrialization were based on steel. The native americans had a greater understanding of astronomy, nothing groudbreaking on the physics front for another 150 years and very little chemistry that hadn't been stolen from the chinese. The NAs were more advanced in medicine, the natural world, and basic environmental biology. Perhaps you only read the half of history written by the victors without ever reading further, you know, like everything else in your life. Fox news economic opinion, faith based lunacy for a religion, and lack of depth in your understanding of just about everything ever discussed on these boards.

The beginnings of industrialization were based on steel. The native americans had a greater understanding of astronomy,

Incorrect. Did they know Jupiter had moons or Saturn had rings for instance? Did they know planets were planets and not stars? Do I really need to go on, I mean why the hell am I even responding to this idiocy??

nothing groudbreaking on the physics front for another 150

The Principia?

years and very little chemistry that hadn't been stolen from the chinese.

I'm not even talking about practical stuff, I'm talking about the friggin CONCEPT. They didn't even have a CONCEPT of proper science much less chemistry.

The NAs were more advanced in medicine,

http://en.wikiped...0.931800

Not a Native American name between 1500-1800. Fail.

the natural world

Whatever the hell that's supposed to mean.

cont.

and basic environmental biology.

Did they write that treatise on a deerskin somewhere and we missed it? Oh that's right most of them didn't even have a written language... Did they even have a concept of scientific biology? Uh no they didn't.

I'd read the books written by Native Americans at the time, but they didn't do that kind of stuff back then. They made arrows and shot each other and buffalo...that's about it.

You expect me to read a revisionist book written by them now, then ya, you're crazy. Just like you wouldn't bother to read a book about why the Earth was flat, unless it was written by a Native American and it might assuage some of that "white guilt" you lefties LOVE to punish yourselves with...

Not a Native American name between 1500-1800. Fail.

You mean after we inadventently then overtly committed genocide against them?

The Principia?

1687. That would be the 150 years or so.

Did they know Jupiter had moons or Saturn had rings for instance?

That was 1610, 100 years later.

Did they know planets were planets and not stars?

Everyone did, the Aztecs and Mayans knew long ago. Evidence suggests the Olmecs did as well.

Do I really need to go on

Did you ever really start?

I mean why the hell am I even responding to this idiocy??

Because you have a self inflated sense of importance and think you're proving me wrong when your knowledge of history and culture is abhorrently short.

Did they even have a concept of scientific biology?

Neither did we until the 1850's.

it might assuage some of that "white guilt" you lefties LOVE to punish yourselves with

Better than blind ignorance.

You're years are off we were talking about the colonial period. Read up the thread.

You're years are off we were talking about the colonial period. Read up the thread.

No, we're talking the re-discovery of the new world by the Spanish. Pay attention.

You're years are off we were talking about the colonial period. Read up the thread.

No, we're talking the re-discovery of the new world by the Spanish. Pay attention.

No we weren't I'll quote the initial post by Quantum that you responded to...

Native Americans were like 2000 years behind Europeans and Middle easterners during the age of exploration and the *colonial period*.

Asterisks mine.

To which you responded:

That's not accurate. Other than the use of Iron and Steel, technologically they two sides were not much different in what they knew about the world. Iron was a huge leap due to durability and usefulness as a tool.

Idiot...

You're years are off we were talking about the colonial period. Read up the thread.

No, we're talking the re-discovery of the new world by the Spanish. Pay attention.

No we weren't I'll quote the initial post by Quantum that you responded to...

Native Americans were like 2000 years behind Europeans and Middle easterners during the age of exploration and the *colonial period*.

Asterisks mine.

Good, When was the age of exploration MM?

To which you responded:

That's not accurate. Other than the use of Iron and Steel, technologically they two sides were not much different in what they knew about the world. Iron was a huge leap due to durability and usefulness as a tool.

Idiot...

You couldn't have described yourself more perfectly. Look at my statement, pickup the context, learn to read.

SH:

You are a joke man. The Native Americans, with the exception of the Mayans and whoever made Puma Punku, had no real metallurgy and no writing.

In the 1500's and 1600's, the native americans were still pretty much equivalent to stone age europeans and middle easterners. They had stone and bone knives, arrows, and spears. They didn't even have the wheel or bronze, for goodness sake. Israel and Egypt had bronze and iron weapons and chariots sometime between 1600B.C. and 1000 B.C. Iron Chariots are seen in the book of Judges, a couple hundred years before David, for example.

In most cases, the Native Americans were so far behind it's a wonder we even call them a civilization.

Just to clarify, read some of this:

http://en.wikiped...lization

And now have a quick look here, in particular, on mathematics, architecture, agriculture and language:

http://en.wikiped...lization

I don't think it is reasonable to dispute that the Mayans had impressively large and densely populated cities, a huge agricultural system, a sophisticated language, and a well organised society. Okay, so technologically they were missing a few of the key ingredients that the Europeans had, but they certainly were worthy of being called a civilisation. More so than many of the other native peoples that the Europeans came across, such as the Australian aboriginals, Pacific Islanders or many African peoples. In at least some respects the Mayans were more advanced than the Europeans.

Good, When was the age of exploration MM?

Oh don't take my word for it.

http://geography....tion.htm

So your dates are STILL screwed up even with your PATHETIC attempt to weasel out of it...

You couldn't have described yourself more perfectly. Look at my statement, pickup the context, learn to read.

I'm not going to help you pretend you said something you didn't say in "context". Your dates are wrong REGARDLESS of context.

Idiot...

Oh don't take my word for it.

http://geography....tion.htm

So your dates are STILL screwed up even with your PATHETIC attempt to weasel out of it...

From your source:

The Age of Exploration or Age of Discovery as it is sometimes called, officially began in the early 15th century and lasted until the 17th century.

You're right, I was off by 100 years. It started in the 1400's, not the 1500's. Making my statements inaccurate in so much that rather than being 150 years to Principia, it was 250 years.

You've proved yourself even more inaccurate and woefully ignorant of history and culture.

@QC, that goes double for you.

Oh don't take my word for it.

http://geography....tion.htm

So your dates are STILL screwed up even with your PATHETIC attempt to weasel out of it...

From your source:

The Age of Exploration or Age of Discovery as it is sometimes called, officially began in the early 15th century and lasted until the 17th century.

You're right, I was off by 100 years. It started in the 1400's, not the 1500's. Making my statements inaccurate in so much that rather than being 150 years to Principia, it was 250 years.

You've proved yourself even more inaccurate and woefully ignorant of history and culture.

@QC, that goes double for you.

It may have STARTED in the 15th centruy but it didn't END until 1700. Which does indeed STILL make your dates wrong...despite your weasel attempt with the "context" play.

Sorry SH you lose.

Idiot...

It may have STARTED in the 15th centruy but it didn't END until 1700. Which does indeed STILL make your dates wrong.

Sorry SH you lose.

Idiot...

I addressed and impeached this statement of yours

Not necessarily. Native Americans were like 2000 years behind Europeans and Middle easterners during the age of exploration and the colonial period.

So during the age of exploration, you're wrong. During the age of colonialism, you're still wrong. So would you like to provide a source, or maybe use the source that nuge presented, to exemplify where you're correct, if at all when faced with my statement?

That's right, you can't. You're one of those "scholars" who refuses to read.

I addressed and impeached this statement of yours

No you didn't if the age lasted until 1700 then every European discovery UP to that point is included in my statement...period. What part of that is your pea brain having trouble grasping?

You're entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts.

You STILL lose.

So during the age of exploration, you're wrong.

Every single discovery I listed happened before 1700. So I'm right.

During the age of colonialism, you're still wrong.

Since this was later than the age of exploration, I'm STILL right.

So would you like to provide a source, or maybe use the source that nuge presented, to exemplify where you're correct, if at all when faced with my statement?

I already did, you apparently can't comprehend the concepts of dates, before, after..time?

No you didn't if the age lasted until 1700 then every European discovery UP to that point is included in my statement...period. What part of that is your pea brain having trouble grasping?

When you combine "Age of Exploration" with Colonialism you're not talking about the 1700's, or the 1600's, you're talking about the entire period. What you're asserting, for the whole period of time, is factually incorrect. What are you not getting? This is basic logic and problem solving. Something that you should be capable of but seem somewhat behind the curve in recognizing.

Every single discovery I listed happened before 1700. So I'm right.

No, you're not right, and no, not everything you listed occured before 1700.

I already did, you apparently can't comprehend the concepts of dates, before, after..time?

You used wikipedia to tell me there were no Native American doctors. You've sourced nothing.

When you combine "Age of Exploration" with Colonialism you're not talking about the 1700's, or the 1600's, you're talking about the entire period.

The entire period includes everything between the starting and ending dates of those ages, later if you're actually going to admit the discussion included the colonial period.

Moreover since the entire discussion is about what the Europeans/Eastern civilizations knew before the Native Americans. Therefore any discovery made by Europeans before the YEAR 1700 and they Native Americans didn't know themselves (even using your weasel tactic) is what we're talking about; since that's when the age of exploration ended. If there's anything I listed that falls after that date feel free to point it out. Otherwise kindly admit your error, or STFU either way I don't care.

Here's a source if you really, REALLY need it...

http://en.wikiped...coveries

Plenty on there I didn't include too.

There's some here that occurred prior to 1700 at the top of the page...

http://www.scienc...1651.htm

physics...

http://www.weburb...oria.htm

Here's some more...

http://www.scienc...tory.htm

Here's an interesting one by google...

http://www.google...f535a7fe

hopefully the whole link comes through.

All of which occur well after the introduction of the European civilizations to the Native Americans. This isn't even entertaining anymore. You've picked an arbitrary date in your mind but you're not sharing it with us.

When are you measureing the two civilizations, pick an exact year and we'll make the comparison. Then tell us what age that year is in.

When are you measureing the two civilizations, pick an exact year and we'll make the comparison. Then tell us what age that year is in.

I didn't pick the dates, Quantum did and then you made a bull**** statement that the Native Americans weren't that far behind the Europeans during the time frames he referenced...which were as WE ALL KNOW BY NOW from the age beginning of the age of exploration to the end of the colonial period...say 1450 to say 1780.

However in comparing civilizations you have to take ALL their accumulated knowledge prior to 1450 into account as well. Quantum said the Europeans/Eastern civilizations were about 2000 years ahead of the Native Americans. Therefore let's say Sumeria in 3500 BC as a starting date for Euro-Eastern civilization.

So we're talking about everything the Europeans/Eastern civilizations knew that the Native Americans DIDN'T excluding the use of iron and steel between 3500 BC and 1780.

That make it clear enough for you YET baby Huey?

I said:

Other than the use of Iron and Steel, technologically they two sides were not much different in what they knew about the world.

So I think you need to go back and reread what was actually said, as opposed to what your diseased little mind made up.

I said:

Other than the use of Iron and Steel, technologically they two sides were not much different in what they knew about the world.

Which was, and is complete BS. The Euro-Eastern civilizations knew a lot more, as I've amply demonstrated and as you've utterly failed to show otherwise.

Moreover you've been completely intellectually dishonest trying to shift and move your position constantly just so you won't have to admit you're full of ****. Quite amusing actually, or sad...actually both.

The Euro-Eastern civilizations knew a lot more, as I've amply demonstrated and as you've utterly failed to show otherwise.

Moreover you've been completely intellectually dishonest trying to shift and move your position constantly just so you won't have to admit you're full of ****. Quite amusing actually, or sad...actually both.

First off, you can type the word. There's no need for puerile asterisks if you're unable to use proper verbiage due to a limited vocabulary. Second, you've proved nothing. As this conversation is now a "NO YOU ARE" waste of time, enjoy speaking with yourself going forward.

Anybody post this link yet?
http://en.wikiped...oamerica
-They had an extensive knowledge of metallurgy. The mystery is why they did not develop it. Ditto the wheel. A similar mystery is why orientals failed to capitalize on gunpowder. One explanation was that these technologies were selectively suppressed by an Informed Leadership, so that world consolidation could proceed unimpeded.

Mesoamericans did have the technological wherewithall to have posed a significant threat to europe within a few generations; and the precious metals and drugs they had to trade for weapons and knowledge made the situation dire. They had million-man armies and their cities were bigger than those in europe. Together these factors made their complete destruction Essential.

This link describes the michigan copper culture:
http://en.wikiped...Michigan

Heres another link:
http://en.wikiped..._America

Did you read your history off the back of a cracker jack box?

Did you get yours from watching Gunsmoke?

Heres a link for the Missippian culture:
http://en.wikiped..._culture

-Fortified cities, irrigation, extensive trade across the continent. Most of this had disappeared by the time settlers had arrived, as diseases spread by early explorers had already done its work.

I suggest the book '1491' for current info on these cultures.

The Euro-Eastern civilizations knew a lot more, as I've amply demonstrated and as you've utterly failed to show otherwise.

Moreover you've been completely intellectually dishonest trying to shift and move your position constantly just so you won't have to admit you're full of ****. Quite amusing actually, or sad...actually both.

First off, you can type the word. There's no need for puerile asterisks if you're unable to use proper verbiage due to a limited vocabulary. Second, you've proved nothing. As this conversation is now a "NO YOU ARE" waste of time, enjoy speaking with yourself going forward.

I proved unequivocally using facts, rather than whiny white guilt leftist idiocy to show the Europeans and Eastern civilizations knew far FAR more than Native American civilizations.

Sometimes actual historical facts are better to rely on that politically correct lies.

I proved unequivocally using facts, rather than whiny white guilt leftist idiocy to show the Europeans and Eastern civilizations knew far FAR more than Native American civilizations.

Don't take my word for it, go with the word of every other poster on the thread.

When you're the only person who holds a stance, perhaps it's time to re-evaluate whether it's true or not. You know, like adults do.

Don't take my word for it, go with the word of every other poster on the thread.

http://philosophy...lar.html

Learn some logic, and how to argue...oh and THINK.

When you're the only person who holds a stance, perhaps it's time to re-evaluate whether it's true or not. You know, like adults do.

So far only YOU and otto seem to think that Native American civilizations were on par with Europeans and Eastern civilizations with their knowledge, and technology...excluding iron and steel.

Not exactly good company...

I wouldn't trust an opinion from either of you further than I could throw either of you.

I OTHO sourced historical FACTS and proved my case using FACTS, rather than mushy feely politically correct incorrectness.

enjoy speaking with yourself going forward.

Guess you lied again. Doesn't that make you evil? How do you feel about being evil and a liar?

@MM & @SH You two are just adorable. If there is ever a Physorg reader meetup I'll buy both of you a beer.

So far only YOU and otto seem to think that Native American civilizations were on par with Europeans and Eastern civilizations with their knowledge, and technology...excluding iron and steel.

On par? Their cities were bigger, their armies were bigger, and they had little religionist-inspired fear of science. They also had potential access to more precious metals which would have ruined euro economies had it found its way over.

They also had extensive intracoastal maritime trade. They were armageddon waiting to happen to western culture.

Not exactly good company...

All youve proven with your extensive dumping here is that your education is woefully outdated at best. And youre in the company of similar willful godlovers who value opinion and posture over substance.

Your self-limiting knowledge of recent revelations about the past is no doubt due to the fact that much of the stuff you grew up on was religion-derived (you quote biblical evidence for chariot use?!?).
more-

Youre afraid to look too closely at recent historical revelations because people like SH and myself have pointed out that much of your most valued history source, the bible, has now been thoroughly discredited.

If you only accepted that FACT, you could learn so much MM! The bibles a lie- give it a try-

Their cities were bigger than China's? Their armies were bigger? They had the scientific method? They didn't even have a written language (most of them) The Europeans had coastal trade for thousands of years. You're not making the case at all that they were on par.

Sources please...

I'll give you one for the cities...show me ONE Native American one on the list.

http://en.wikiped..._history

You and SH are so full of it your eyes are brown...

"Their capital, Tenochtitlan, is the site of modern-day capital of Mexico, Mexico City. At its peak, it was one of the largest cities in the world with population estimates of 300,000." -And just to qualify my assertion a little bit, their cities were bigger than any in Europe at the time. Bigger than Paris for instance.

Link for the above Exerpt:
http://en.wikiped...bian_era

I proved unequivocally using facts, rather than whiny white guilt leftist idiocy

YOU'RE the one who's bought into a message, you know the earlier xianist manifest destiny stuff about the natives being less capable and deserving than gods chosen people- euros that is.

Truth is, had euros not sucker-punched them, they would have begun independent trade with euro and mediterranean (and chinese) merchants, bought all the tech they needed, and you would have seen Aztec triremes bristling with polished bronze cannon oaring through the strait of Gibraltar within a century.

China may have made the necessity of euro conquest even more urgent:
http://www.1421.tv/

You'll find the quote about 'far larger than any in europe' on this page:
http://books.goog...mp;hl=en
-I've seen it a number of times. As even this textbook tells you, the number is in dispute but the 300,000 figure is not the highest.

"Their capital, Tenochtitlan, is the site of modern-day capital of Mexico, Mexico City. At its peak, it was one of the largest cities in the world with population estimates of 300,000." -And just to qualify my assertion a little bit, their cities were bigger than any in Europe at the time. Bigger than Paris for instance.

We were NEVER just talking about Europe, you'd know that if you knew how to read or follow an argument. Moreover this like refutes the 300,000 number and says it may have been as low as 200,000

http://en.wikiped...chtitlan

BUT again we were never really talking about city size we were talking about technology. Another thing you'd know if you were actually capable of reading. I don't hold it against you though as you're the typical brainwashed leftist idiot, I'd think something was wrong if you COULD argue logically or had a nit of reading comprehension.

You'll find the quote about 'far larger than any in europe' on this page:
http://books.goog...mp;hl=en
-I've seen it a number of times. As even this textbook tells you, the number is in dispute but the 300,000 figure is not the highest.

My source refutes that number. Moreover since we're not just talking about Europe there were cities in China in the 1500s approaching one million people. So you fail.

You'll find the quote about 'far larger than any in europe' on this page:
http://books.goog...mp;hl=en
-I've seen it a number of times. As even this textbook tells you, the number is in dispute but the 300,000 figure is not the highest.

We were NEVER just talking about Europe

Who's we? I know what I was talking about- who ever knows WHAT you're trying to say?

you're the typical brainwashed leftist idiot

And I shall present my other asscheek for to be bitchslapped, as is the Xian way.

As for native peoples being less deserving and me "buying into" manifest destiny. Well as an expert...the ONLY existing expert on my own beliefs I can tell you I never thought that, nor do I now think that.

You yourself could have deduced that because I clearly never left the Eastern Civilizations out of the conversation, but then again that would require a minimal level of reading comprehension and intellectual honesty on your part...

Uh, I didn't mention china. Anybody else ever call you anal retentive? You know, when even your own shits too precious to part with? Jesus treasures your creativity too.

I can tell you I never thought that, nor do I now think that.

I think that subconsciously you think that because that's what you were taught to think. From learning your history from Wagon Train and F Troop.

Uh, I didn't mention china. Anybody else ever call you anal retentive? You know, when even your own shits too precious to part with? Jesus treasures your creativity too.

I can tell you I never thought that, nor do I now think that.

I think that subconsciously you think that because that's what you were taught to think. From learning your history from Wagon Train and F Troop.

Uh I know you didn't I did. That's what the whole argument has been about though, whether you know it or not, whether you bother to mention it or not I'M going to. Eastern civilizations have been a part of the argument since it started dingbat.

I think that subconsciously you think that because that's what you were taught to think. From learning your history from Wagon Train and F Troop.

So we're going from non-existent non factual white guilt revisionist "I wish this is the way it was" logic to you ACTUALLY telling me what's in my subconscious.

I'm not surprised a bit...

Uh, I didn't mention china. Anybody else ever call you anal retentive? You know, when even your own shits too precious to part with? Jesus treasures your creativity too.

I can tell you I never thought that, nor do I now think that.

I think that subconsciously you think that because that's what you were taught to think. From learning your history from Wagon Train and F Troop.

Uh I know you didn't I did. That's what the whole argument has been about though, whether you know it or not, whether you bother to mention it or not I'M going to. Eastern civilizations have been a part of the argument since it started dingbat.

and your point is... what? Otto sees nothing in your responses that limits otto from making whatever point he wants to. Klar?

Perhaps this will help you understand your affliction:
http://en.wikiped...etentive

and your point is... what? Otto sees nothing in your responses that limits otto from making whatever point he wants to. Klar?

My point is that if you are going to jump into the middle of an argument and attempt to make a point then it helps to know what the argument is actually about...which is of course far beyond you. That doesn't mean you can't try though does it?

Besides there were larger cities even in Europe at the time. Paris, Venice, and Constantinople.

Or perhaps this:
http://en.wikiped...xpulsive

-The Internet can help us to heal-

Or perhaps this:
http://en.wikiped...xpulsive

-The Internet can help us to heal-

Indeed it can.

http://en.wikiped...disorder

You and SH are so full of it your eyes are brown...

Green actually.

My point is that if you are going to jump into the middle of an argument and attempt to make a point then it helps to know what the argument is actually about...which is of course far beyond you.

Just so you're informed otto, the argument is about how ModernMystic is upset that he's a clown and I commonly point out his errors making others laugh at his antics. He has some sort of a grudge because I called him a liar, then he misread what I had wrote and attempted to project his idiocy on me.

Now that you're all caught up, have a go.

You and SH are so full of it your eyes are brown...

Green actually.

My point is that if you are going to jump into the middle of an argument and attempt to make a point then it helps to know what the argument is actually about...which is of course far beyond you.

Just so you're informed otto, the argument is about how ModernMystic is upset that he's a clown and I commonly point out his errors making others laugh at his antics. He has some sort of a grudge because I called him a liar, then he misread what I had wrote and attempted to project his idiocy on me.

Now that you're all caught up, have a go.

Still don't have a source to prove that the Native Americans were the ones who actually ran the Apollo program?

Look harder, I'm sure you'll find some leftist revisionist loon who wrote a book about it you can quote...

Oh and you're still a liar, and therefore by your own standards evil. Do you like being an evil man?

You and SH are so full of it your eyes are brown...

Green actually.

My point is that if you are going to jump into the middle of an argument and attempt to make a point then it helps to know what the argument is actually about...which is of course far beyond you.

Just so you're informed otto, the argument is about how ModernMystic is upset that he's a clown and I commonly point out his errors making others laugh at his antics. He has some sort of a grudge because I called him a liar, then he misread what I had wrote and attempted to project his idiocy on me.

Now that you're all caught up, have a go.

In other words, same shit different thread-
http://www.youtub...a_player

This ones even more suitable:
http://www.youtub...a_player
Ha.

Hold on now mm, as you may have guessed ICP are Xian religionist godlovers:
http://www.contac..._1172294

-Who's methods of thinking and reaching conclusions led them to the same place as you're did. Time for a little introspection, eh?

My favorite ICP line: 'When I stick a pencil in my eye, I can't see shit- why?'

Still don't have a source to prove that the Native Americans were the ones who actually ran the Apollo program?

You really are a clown. Are you content amusing us in this manner? Your silly statements are becomming entertaining again.

Oh and you're still a liar, and therefore by your own standards evil. Do you like being an evil man?

See what I'm talking about Otto? It's sad, he could have had such a bright future.

I still see neither of you have provided proof or sources of information that shows that the Native American civilizations were even close to their European/Eastern counterparts technologically excluding the use of iron and steel.

Finally give up on that? Kinda like saying the Earth is flat...I know it must be hard to find sources to quote for such an idiotic position. Well CREDIBLE sources that is.