Most mortgage meltdowns not caused by subprimes

Oct 22, 2010

Subprime mortgages were not the main reason behind the housing crisis that started in 2009 and continues to bedevil the faltering U.S. economy, according to a University of Michigan study.

"Our analysis shows that the major underlying driver of the continuing foreclosure crisis was aggressive refinancing using adjustable rate mortgage loans that looked safe at the time because of increasing housing prices," said Frank Stafford, an at the U-M Institute for Social Research (ISR).

In California, Florida, Arizona and Illinois, the percentage of first mortgages refinanced between 2004 and 2007 was especially high – reaching nearly 60 percent in California.

In the same period, the percentage of first mortgages that had adjustable rates grew to nearly 15 percent, from just over 10 percent in the late '90s.

The analysis was conducted by Stafford and ISR research investigator Elena Gouskova for the Michigan Retirement Research Center at ISR. Data from the ISR Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) were used for the analyses.

The PSID is a long-standing, intergenerational, nationally representative study of approximately 9,000 U.S. families, and 24,000 individuals living within these families, conducted since 1968.

Among the key findings of the study:

• More than16 percent of households with mortgages anticipated difficulties making mortgage payments in 2009 and 2010.

• Households headed by younger people ages 25 to 34, by less-educated people, and by African Americans were most likely to report some kind of mortgage trouble, including being "underwater," falling behind on payments, requesting a mortgage modification, or being in .

• The proportion of younger households with housing costs—mortgage payments, insurance, real estate taxes, and utilities—totaling 20 percent or more of their family income rose persistently throughout the period.

• Households headed by those age 65 and older, were more likely to hold mortgages than in the past—30 percent in 2007 compared to 20 percent in the early '90s.

According to Stafford, the increase in the percentage of older households with mortgages suggests that the older generation may have less capacity to help out younger family members, who are more likely to be having financial problems, including troubles.

"The First National Bank of Granddad may not be in the position it was a decade ago," Stafford said.

Explore further: Research shows too much executive turnover hurts companies

More information: Paper, abstract, and key findings

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Older Americans: How they are faring in the recession

Sep 16, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- Older Americans have weathered the financial crisis relatively well, although many now expect to work longer than they did just a year ago, according to a University of Michigan study released on Capitol ...

Credit crunch hits cash-strapped homeowners

Dec 11, 2008

Homeowners have drawn on their biggest asset, the roof over their heads, not to fund 'champagne moments' but to get through hard times; that's the finding of a preliminary study by Durham University.

Recommended for you

Study identifies upside to financial innovations

Aug 27, 2014

Financial innovations can make or break an economy. While the negative impact of financial innovation has been extensively covered, a new study of financial innovations before and during the last financial crisis indicates ...

Study shows social welfare may fall in a more ethical market

Aug 25, 2014

For "credence services" such as auto-repair, healthcare, and legal services, the benefit to the customers for the service is difficult to assess before and even after the service. A new study in a journal of the Institute ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Shootist
not rated yet Oct 22, 2010
"aggressive refinancing using adjustable rate mortgage loans that looked safe at the time because of increasing housing prices,"


were not most of these re-fi's sub-prime, by their very definition?