Frozen secrets of the 'Ice Cube'

October 27, 2010 By Miles O'Brien and Marcia Walton
IceCube, an astronomy project at the South Pole, is a telescope designed to detect subatomic particles called neutrinos that originate in far space and pass through the Earth, infrequently interacting with the Antarctic ice. Credit: Dr. Kathie L. Olsen, National Science Foundation

There's nothing like temperatures that can reach minus 100 degrees Fahrenheit to keep you on your toes.

For engineers Erik Verhagen and Camille Parisel, working in Antarctica on a project appropriately called "IceCube" is both challenging and exciting.

While there are ways to get used to the harsh climate, these experts have to be very resourceful to fix technical difficulties so far away from "civilization."

The video will load shortly

"Whatever the problems are," says Parisel, "you have to do it yourself, you can't call and say, 'Well, help me, I don't know how to do that.' Sometimes you don't even have the Internet. We work together to fix problems; we try to make it work and we help each other."

"Sometimes it happens that you are short of something, and you are creative, [so] you build it yourself. That's how you resolve problems," adds Verhagen.

Parisel and Verhagen are among about 250 people around the globe who work on one of the most unusual observatories on our planet.

What is IceCube?

The IceCube Neutrino Observatory is a collection of thousands of sensors, buried up to a mile and a half below the surface of the Antarctic, designed to study . Neutrinos are mysterious, that have very little mass, and only interact weakly with other particles.

Neutrinos are emitted by violent cosmic events, such as supernovas or . Why are they so important? Tracing their origin could provide clues in the search for and other secrets of our universe.

Before IceCube, there was AMANDA. After field tests of drilling techniques and sensor technology in Greenland, a collaboration of scientific institutions constructed a prototype neutrino telescope, the Antarctic Muon and Neutrino Detector Array (AMANDA), under Antarctic ice.Credit: Robert Morse/University of Wisconsin-Madison

So what was the first reaction when University of Wisconsin physics professor Francis Halzen proposed this one kilometer cube of detectors, buried in the harshest environment on Earth?

"They all think we are crazy," laughs Halzen from IceCube headquarters in Madison, Wis.

But putting this observatory (a telescope that looks within the Earth instead of out at the sky), in the crystal clear ice below the started making more and more sense.

With support from the National Science Foundation (NSF), Halzen and his team in Madison, plus other physicists and researchers around the world, got the search for this mysterious, ghostly particle going.

"They are very difficult to catch," says Halzen. "They are just like light; there is basically no difference between neutrinos and light. The only difference is that light doesn't go through a wall whereas neutrinos go through everything. And so just accidentally, they run straight into the nucleus of an atom and then create lots of other particles, which we can see and it's only these accidental crashes of neutrinos that allow us to observe them. That's basically what IceCube is doing."

When a neutrino does collide with an atom of ice, that collision produces a particle called a muon. In the transparent Antarctic ice, the muon radiates blue light, which is what IceCube's optical sensors detect.

At least a couple of times during the early going--after the first season of drilling in 2004-2005, Halzen feared that the logistics were just too daunting.

"IceCube, I always say, [had] two challenges," explains Halzen. "One challenge was to make the ice work; to understand the ice and to turn it into a particle physics detector. The other challenge, equally big, was to drill these holes. That came from the knowledge of these engineers."

"Hot water drilling is an art. It is an incredible art; almost not a science, almost not engineering," he says. "It's just difficult; it's a choreography, which has to work perfectly, and the people learned this very fast."

IceCube will be completed during the 2010-2011 Antarctic summer, (beginning in November 2010), the last of 86 strings of sensors will be lowered into the ice and frozen in place. Each string (actually very heavy cable) includes 64 Digital Optical Modules (DOMs).

IceCube mechanical engineer Terry Benson has traveled to Antarctica five times to install the basketball-sized DOMs.

"On the bottom there is a photo multiplier tube and it is basically a light bulb in reverse, so it picks up light and sends an electrical signal to this top section, which is basically a high powered computer," explains Benson.

Being buried more than a mile below the ice means there is no chance of retrieving a DOM with a glitch to try and repair it. That's why the sensors undergo a lot of tests at the IceCube engineering facility in Stoughton, Wis., before they are shipped off to their very permanent homes.

"So they need first to be able to maintain extreme pressures in the water-filled bore hole when we put them in," says Benson. "Once the hole freezes back, there is intense pressure there as well. These ultimately get tested to 10,000 psi."

"Once they are frozen back in the ice, they get hooked up to our central gathering spot of data. There're onboard computers here that can be maintained from above the surface, and software and firmware updates can be done without ever accessing these," says Benson, who has worked on IceCube since he was a student in 2003.

Scientific Surprises

Ever since the very first string of DOMs started its detection, physicists have been collecting data on neutrinos. And, as sometimes happens in basic scientific research, there are discoveries that are unanticipated. That's what's happened with the work of Rasha Abbasi, a post doctoral physicist on the IceCube project.

While others concentrated on the neutrinos, Abbasi took a closer look at the mountains of other raw data coming in; the particles constantly bombarding IceCube, generated by cosmic rays.

"The cosmic rays that I looked at are mostly the background for other researchers, that are looking for neutrinos, which is what IceCube was built for," says Abbasi.

"This background is like billions of events that are coming downward on IceCube."

What did she find?

Abbasi created a "skymap" of all the data IceCube was collecting, and discovered an unusual pattern in the intensity of cosmic rays directed toward the Earth's Southern Hemisphere. There was an excess in rays detected in one part of the sky and a deficit in the other.

"So that if they were all coming in the same intensity from all the sky, we would call that isotropic. And if they would come from one direction more than another direction, we would call that anisotropy," explains Abbasi.

It's the first time such "lopsidedness" has been detected in the Southern Hemisphere. According to Abbasi, the unusual pattern could be due to a magnetic field surrounding Earth, or the effect of a nearby supernova remnant.

This finding is a true delight to Halzen, as a physicist and a teacher--learning about phenomenon the telescope was not even designed to study.

"We already have one beautiful example of a totally serendipitous discovery," he says.

Along with the pioneering science in the search for neutrinos, Halzen says it is the perfect topic to get just about anyone interested in scientific research.

"This is an ideal project for outreach, of course. The combination of studying the universe with this mysterious particle and doing it in this unfriendly environment, it's just the right combination to get kids of all ages interested," says Halzen. "Whether it is in a classroom or an audience of adults, it is always a pleasure because it is so easy to get people excited about it."

And, for those on the project like Parisel and Verhagen, who spend months in the darkness of the Antarctic winter with just a few dozen other people, the project also creates a lifelong camaraderie.

"After nine months of being completely isolated, it's your family. It's as strong as your own family, and I have a family forever," says Verhagen.

Explore further: Antarctic "Telescopes" Look for Cosmic Rays

More information: Learn more in this special report:
And in this discovery:

Related Stories

Antarctic "Telescopes" Look for Cosmic Rays

February 8, 2005

Working in the harsh conditions of Antarctica, Maryland researchers are creating new ways of detecting cosmic rays, high energy particles that bombard the Earth from beyond our solar system.

First critical parts of giant neutrino telescope in place

February 15, 2005

Working under harsh Antarctic conditions, an international team of scientists, engineers and technicians has set in place the first critical elements of a massive neutrino telescope at the South Pole. The successful deployment ...

IceCube spies unexplained pattern of cosmic rays

July 27, 2010

( -- Though still under construction, the IceCube Neutrino Observatory at the South Pole is already delivering scientific results - including an early finding about a phenomenon the telescope was not even designed ...

IceCube drillers train for final Antarctic season

July 30, 2010

( -- The sweltering Wisconsin summer is a far cry from conditions at the South Pole, but ice drillers from around the United States will gather next week in Stoughton to prepare for the upcoming Antarctic work ...

IceCube neutrino observatory nears completion

August 31, 2010

In December 2010, IceCube -- the world's first kilometer-scale neutrino observatory, which is located beneath the Antarctic ice -- will finally be completed after two decades of planning. In an article in the AIP's Review ...

Recommended for you

Counting down to the new ampere

August 29, 2016

After it's all over, your lights will be just as bright, and your refrigerator just as cold. But very soon the ampere—the SI base unit of electrical current—will take on an entirely new identity, and NIST scientists are ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (5) Oct 27, 2010
"There was an excess in rays detected in one part of the sky and a deficit in the other." Actually, that makes sense when viewed from the perspective of my model of the Universe, in which the creation is an ongoing process at the creation front which advances at/from the periphery of the Universe. If anything, this tells us that we are not at the center of the "big bang", but rather in a position in this Universe somewhat analogous to our relative position in the Milky Way, and the revolution about the Earth's axis takes those detectors in the direction of that creation front every 24 hours. I presume that is the observation on which the conclusion is based. The neutrinos are obviously not coming from the center of our galaxy, otherwise that would be noted.
not rated yet Oct 27, 2010
No mention that the sun is a nuetrino making machine that is flooding the solar system with the hard to detect particles.. or the fact that the earth produces nuetrinos ...

I am not a physicist but I wonder ... these things rarely react with anything ... 99.99999% go straight through the earth never hitting a single atom --- if you do see a colision how do you knwo where it came from?? all stars produce them... all planets produce them..
1 / 5 (23) Oct 27, 2010
..these things rarely react with anything ... 99.99999% go straight through the earth never hitting a single atom --- if you do see a colision how do you knwo where it came from?? all stars produce them... all planets produce them..
Not all neutrinos can be detected in IceCube experiment, only the most energetic neutrinos coming from cosmic space can be detected there (i.e. those with energy higher than ~30 GeV/neutrino). The detector mesh enables to determine the direction of particles causing an events. Those coming from outer space will be ignored - so we can be sure, IceCube will detect only the muons coming from neutrinos, which passed through the whole Earth - i.e. not muons resulting from stratospheric events.

The drilling of one hole 2km in depth requires 20 cubic meters of hot water passed during 48 hours, during which more than 700 cubic meters of ice are melted.
not rated yet Oct 27, 2010
actually baudrunner i am just toying with the idea of an assymmetric Jet Bang, like relativistic jets from black holes but on a grander scale, what we call dark energy, in that hypothetical construct could be seen as the plasma beam loosing its self pinching magnetic coherence and widening as a result. It would creata and axis, that has slightly different spacetime curvature depending if we are looking towards the origin or away from it where spacetime already become more scattered. This is just a thought exercise spurred by notions such as The Dark Flow and without any scientific proof, but it would be interesting to meusure if not only our planet, our milkyway, but whole clusters of milkyways seem to have a statistically preffered spin orientation/plane, that would hint at a central axis, a beam and prehaps spin conservation from the singularity that Jetbanged us in existence...
not rated yet Oct 27, 2010
Duh! I hope the spelling police was eating donuts when i wrote that....
5 / 5 (2) Oct 27, 2010
" would be interesting to meusure if not only our planet, our milkyway, but whole clusters of milkyways seem to have a statistically preffered spin orientation/plane, that would hint at a central axis, a beam and prehaps spin conservation from the singularity that Jetbanged us in existence..."

If some sort of 'primordial axial alignment' did exist, how would you measure it? Astronomical bodies tend to smash into each other quite a bit and trying to reconstruct the original spin axis of a solar system-galaxy-galaxy cluster would be near impossible.
1 / 5 (23) Oct 27, 2010
This axial alignment was actually detected - but it has nothing to do with article subject. We could discuss dark flow, CMB anisotropy or polarization or WMAP cold spot with the same relevancy.
5 / 5 (2) Oct 27, 2010
I'm familiar with the papers by Longo and the other observations you reference, but like the recently announced 'inconstant' fine structure constant, I think more studies are warranted (and is off topic anyway, I agree).

But I do look forward to new discoveries from Ice Cube and its completion next year. It has already made some useful contributions to astronomy in its partially built configuration, as described in the article.
5 / 5 (1) Oct 28, 2010
If some sort of 'primordial axial alignment' did exist, how would you measure it?

There would be anisotropy in the chirality of nonlinearly polarized photons from cosmic sources, along the axis of rotation. I read an article in the Science Times section of the New York Times a few years ago about a team of astronomers who claimed that they’d identified an axis of cosmic rotation this way. But the follow-up I’ve done online has only turned up contrary reports, like this one by Dr. Sean Carroll: http://prepostero...h/aniso/
not rated yet Oct 28, 2010
wouldn't there be a huge bright dot in the sky map associated with the sun which is a strong source of neutrino and is just nearby
1 / 5 (21) Oct 31, 2010
How muon differ from neutrinos?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.