Researcher finds differences but no general trends when potential contaminants bond to nanoparticles

Oct 30, 2010

More research is needed to understand how nanoparticles could impact the environment. When it comes to the size of nanoparticles moving contaminants in water, the jury’s still out. That’s what Moira Ridley, a professor at Texas Tech University’s Department of Geosciences, found out with several experiments involving strontium and nanoparticles of titanium dioxide – one of the most widely produced nanoparticles used in everything from cosmetics and sunscreen to automotive paint.

She will present her findings Sunday (Oct. 31) during the annual meeting of the Geological Society of America.

As nanotechnology becomes one of the next scientific frontiers, very little is known about how will react in the environment, Ridley said. Many scientists worry that nanoparticles could carry more per gram than larger particles because, though smaller, the nanoparticles have more surface area onto which contaminants can bind and, therefore be dispersed through, say, an aquifer or a stream.

However, after studying how different sizes of particles adsorb strontium from water, she said particle size results in subtle differences in the interaction between the nanoparticle and strontium.

“The general view is that because nanoparticles have large surface area, they should be able to absorb more contaminants relative to their size per gram, than a larger particle,” she said. “But what we’ve found is that the effects of nanoparticle size on transporting potential contaminants are much more subtle.”

Through a $366,000 grant from the National Science Foundation, Ridley studied titanium dioxide behavior with strontium because both are environmentally relevant and the behavior of large titanium dioxide particles is well understood.

“The key question is ‘do smaller particles transport potential contaminant particles more readily,’” she said. “We’ve found that it depends. We do see differences, but no specific trends, as yet. It does depend on the size of the nanoparticle, but it’s also dependent on the material. Not all nanoparticles are going to behave in the same way. Essentially, this is why we need this type of research.”

Explore further: Experts cautious over Google nanoparticle project

Provided by Texas Tech University

5 /5 (1 vote)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

New nanoparticles could improve cancer treatment

Oct 05, 2010

In recent years, studies have shown that for many types of cancer, combination drug therapy is more effective than single drugs. However, it is usually difficult to get the right amount of each drug to the ...

Recommended for you

Nanosafety research: The quest for the gold standard

Oct 29, 2014

Empa toxicologist Harald Krug has lambasted his colleagues in the journal Angewandte Chemie. He evaluated several thousand studies on the risks associated with nanoparticles and discovered no end of shortc ...

New nanodevice to improve cancer treatment monitoring

Oct 27, 2014

In less than a minute, a miniature device developed at the University of Montreal can measure a patient's blood for methotrexate, a commonly used but potentially toxic cancer drug. Just as accurate and ten ...

Molecular beacons shine light on how cells 'crawl'

Oct 24, 2014

Adherent cells, the kind that form the architecture of all multi-cellular organisms, are mechanically engineered with precise forces that allow them to move around and stick to things. Proteins called integrin ...

User comments : 0

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.