Researcher finds differences but no general trends when potential contaminants bond to nanoparticles

Oct 30, 2010

More research is needed to understand how nanoparticles could impact the environment. When it comes to the size of nanoparticles moving contaminants in water, the jury’s still out. That’s what Moira Ridley, a professor at Texas Tech University’s Department of Geosciences, found out with several experiments involving strontium and nanoparticles of titanium dioxide – one of the most widely produced nanoparticles used in everything from cosmetics and sunscreen to automotive paint.

She will present her findings Sunday (Oct. 31) during the annual meeting of the Geological Society of America.

As nanotechnology becomes one of the next scientific frontiers, very little is known about how will react in the environment, Ridley said. Many scientists worry that nanoparticles could carry more per gram than larger particles because, though smaller, the nanoparticles have more surface area onto which contaminants can bind and, therefore be dispersed through, say, an aquifer or a stream.

However, after studying how different sizes of particles adsorb strontium from water, she said particle size results in subtle differences in the interaction between the nanoparticle and strontium.

“The general view is that because nanoparticles have large surface area, they should be able to absorb more contaminants relative to their size per gram, than a larger particle,” she said. “But what we’ve found is that the effects of nanoparticle size on transporting potential contaminants are much more subtle.”

Through a $366,000 grant from the National Science Foundation, Ridley studied titanium dioxide behavior with strontium because both are environmentally relevant and the behavior of large titanium dioxide particles is well understood.

“The key question is ‘do smaller particles transport potential contaminant particles more readily,’” she said. “We’ve found that it depends. We do see differences, but no specific trends, as yet. It does depend on the size of the nanoparticle, but it’s also dependent on the material. Not all nanoparticles are going to behave in the same way. Essentially, this is why we need this type of research.”

Explore further: Nano-needles can force medicine into cells, even when they resist taking it

Provided by Texas Tech University

5 /5 (1 vote)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

New nanoparticles could improve cancer treatment

Oct 05, 2010

In recent years, studies have shown that for many types of cancer, combination drug therapy is more effective than single drugs. However, it is usually difficult to get the right amount of each drug to the ...

Recommended for you

Radioactive nanoparticles target cancer cells

May 21, 2013

Cancers of all types become most deadly when they metastasize and spread tumors throughout the body. Once cancer has reached this stage, it becomes very difficult for doctors to locate and treat the numerous tumors that can ...

How gold nanoparticles can help fight ovarian cancer

May 21, 2013

Positively charged gold nanoparticles are usually toxic to cells, but cancer cells somehow manage to avoid nanoparticle toxicity. Mayo Clinic researchers found out why, and determined how to make the nanoparticles effective ...

User comments : 0

More news stories

Scientists develop cheaper, more efficient fuel cells

(Phys.org) —Using the Canadian Light Source (CLS) synchrotron, researchers have discovered a way to create cheaper fuel cells by dividing normally expensive platinum metal into nanoparticles (or even single ...