Chest compression-only CPR improves survival in cardiac arrest patients

Oct 14, 2010
Peter Nagele, M.D., demonstrates chest compression-only CPR on a mannequin in the School of Medicine's Clinical Simulation Center. Credit: Robert Boston

Heart attack patients whose hearts have stopped beating and who receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) from bystanders fare better if their resuscitators skip the rescue breaths and do only chest compression, according to a study led by researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis.

The study, published online on Oct. 15 in The Lancet, determined that the chest compression-only method of CPR improved survival rates over standard CPR.

Standard CPR involves alternating chest compressions with rescue breaths.

"We looked at data from three studies," says principal investigator Peter Nagele, MD. "Individually, the studies were 'underpowered' statistically and could not show a survival benefit. Basically, there were too few study subjects to determine whether one method of CPR improved survival more than another, but when we combined all three studies, there was a significant increase in survival when witnesses were told by 911 dispatchers to provide chest compression only."

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.
When a person has a heart attack, and the heart stops beating, a new study led by researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis suggests that the victim will have better odds of survival if the bystanders who work to resuscitate the victim skip the rescue breaths and perform CPR using only chest compressions. Jim Dryden has the story. Credit: Washington University BioMed Radio

Nagele, an assistant professor of anesthesiology and chief of trauma anesthesiology at Barnes-Jewish Hospital in St. Louis, and his team combined the data from the three studies in a meta-analysis and were able to analyze in more than 3,700 cardiac arrest patients who received either standard CPR or chest compression only. Those smaller studies had suggested chest compression-only CPR may improve survival – one noted a 14 percent increased survival to hospital discharge, while a second reported a 24 percent improvement in 30-day survival – but because of relatively small numbers in those studies, it was impossible to conclusively determine which of the two CPR methods was actually better.

But analyzing all three studies, Nagele's team determined that survival improved by 22 percent when bystanders called 911 and were advised by the dispatcher to do chest compression-only CPR.

"When a person goes into cardiac arrest because of a problem with the heart, that individual normally has plenty of oxygen in the body," Nagele explains. "So rescue breaths aren't as vital to survival as trying to keep blood flowing as regularly as possible. However, if cardiac arrest is secondary to trauma, drowning or a problem not directly related to heart function, then it is advisable to do standard CPR that includes rescue breaths. In those cases, getting oxygen into the system is crucial."

The findings do not apply to children with cardiac arrest, Nagele stresses.

"It is very uncommon for kids to go into cardiac arrest due to a primary heart problem," Nagele says. "If cardiac arrest does occur, it's likely to be secondary to a severe asthma attack, an allergic reaction or something else unrelated to the heart. Under those circumstances, the body needs oxygen. I strongly recommend chest compression and rescue breaths in kids."

Whether a bystander had previous training in CPR had no effect on patient survival in this study. When emergency dispatchers recommend only chest compression, it is relatively easy for a bystander to find the proper area of the chest, begin doing compressions and keep going until emergency medical technicians arrive, Nagele says.

Part of the reason earlier studies could not verify a statistical benefit from the chest-compression-only technique was that the patient survival rate hovers around 10 percent. Even with 1,000 or 2,000 patients in a study, the total number of survivors was small. Only by combining data from all three studies to generate larger numbers were the investigators able to confirm improved survival.

The research team, which included investigators from the Medical University of Vienna in Austria, determined that a 20 percent improvement in survival related to chest compression-only CPR in cardiac arrest patients in North America and the European Union could save as many as 5,000 to 10,000 lives each year.

The new study also found that the benefit occurred only when 911 dispatchers coached bystanders to use chest compression-only CPR. In several uncontrolled studies that simply asked bystanders whether they did only chest compressions or standard CPR, the investigators found no survival benefit with the chest compression-only technique.

Nagele says his findings suggest that if someone nearby has a , it's important to first call 911, and then begin chest compressions. He says if it takes several minutes for help to arrive, it also may become necessary to begin rescue breaths, but for the first five to 10 minutes, are more important.

"The heart doesn't literally stop during ," he says. "It gets super excited and electrically very active, and the only way to get it back into rhythm is with an electrical shock, a defibrillation. By doing chest compression-only , a bystander is basically buying time until a paramedic with a defibrillator can jump-start the heart."

Explore further: Shopping for an egg donor: Is beauty, brains, or health most important?

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

New studies confirm chest compressions alone

Dec 26, 2007

Two large-scale studies published in the Dec. 18 issue of the American Heart Association’s medical journal, Circulation, report that the chances of surviving cardiac arrest are no better – and may be worse – when b ...

Recommended for you

New MCAT shifts focus, will include humanities

12 hours ago

(HealthDay)—The Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) has been revised, and the latest changes, including more humanities such as social sciences, are due to be implemented next April, according to a report ...

Using feminist theory to understand male rape

23 hours ago

Decades of feminist research have framed rape and sexual assault as a 'women's issue', leaving little room for the experiences of male victims. But a new study published in the Journal of Gender Studies suggests that feminist ...

Simulation-based training improves endoscopy execution

Oct 18, 2014

(HealthDay)—Simulation-based training (SBT) improves clinicians' performance of gastrointestinal endoscopy in both test settings and clinical practice, according to research published in the October issue ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

JamesThomas
5 / 5 (1) Oct 15, 2010
A 20+% improvement of survival rates is very significant. I hope this research gets the global attention it deserves.
d44x
not rated yet Oct 15, 2010
Even though there is a very high probability that the patient will die, it's still important to do CPR, as by doing so you keep the major organs viable for transplant - therefore you'll probably save several lives even if the person dies.
freethinking
1 / 5 (2) Oct 17, 2010
d44x, though I don't believe in most transplants, I do agree that a 20% survival rate improvement is significant. Also I liked that they specified that children and trama cases are different and AR is useful in those cases.