3 Questions: ARPA-E chief on the energy challenge

October 15, 2010 By Greg Frost
Arun Majumdar, director of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy (ARPA-E), discussed the global energy challenge and the role of his agency at an event on Wednesday. Photo: Justin Knight

During a visit on Wednesday to MIT, Arun Majumdar, director of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy (ARPA-E), discussed the global energy challenge and the role his agency plays in trying to foster transformational energy research and development. Majumdar’s presentation to a standing-room-only crowd in Bartos Theater served as both a wake-up call (the U.S. spends more on dog-food R&D than it does on electrical-power R&D, he noted) and a source of inspiration (Majumdar discussed some of the very real and exciting energy projects his agency is funding, including several here at MIT).

After the event, which was sponsored by the MIT Energy Initiative, MIT News asked Majumdar about a surprising new proposal for federal energy-research spending out this week and whether U.S. federal spending should focus more on creating incentives for the adoption and implementation of existing clean-energy technologies and less on basic research.

Q. The American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank, and the liberal-leaning Brookings Institution this week announced a highly unusual joint proposal that calls for increasing federal funding for basic research on clean energy from $4 billion to $25 billion. Do you see enough worthy projects on the horizon to justify that degree of spending?

A. You bet. Absolutely. We are totally oversubscribed. The innovation ecosystem — the scientific and engineering community — is ready. They’re just asking how high they should be jumping.

Q. Assuming there would be enough of these projects, how would you see the potential role of ARPA-E in such a program?

A. ARPA-E alone cannot solve the whole energy problem. That’s not its role. There’s a need for basic science — discoveries and tools, etc. — and there’s a need for deployment and supporting technologies that are already here today. ARPA-E’s goal, as I mentioned earlier, is to take the science and translate it into technologies that do not exist today that, should they exist, would make today’s technologies obsolete and that are too risky today for the private sector to invest in.

Q. Some people suggest that new “breakthroughs” in technology are not essential, that we already know how to achieve significant reductions in greenhouse-gas emissions, and that federal spending should focus more on incentives for the adoption and implementation of existing technologies than on basic research. How do you address such arguments?

A. I disagree with that. I don’t think they are mutually exclusive. There are technologies today that need to be deployed — there is no question about it — and there are some tax incentives and financial incentives that should be used to create the market and get [the technologies] out. But that does not mean that all the technologies exist today. If someone has said that, they are grossly mistaken. As I said, if you can show me a battery that can make an electric car have the same cost — and the same performance and the same loads and the same range — as an internal-combustion car, show me. I’ll buy it! You cannot. You cannot do carbon capture at a cost that is lower than its price. You cannot make synthetic fuels at a capacity that compares with petroleum at the same cost. You cannot do that today. So the question is not just about today’s technology and getting it out: We are in a globally competitive environment. If we don’t grab that opportunity and develop technologies that will bring down the cost and increase margins, someone else is going to do it.


This story is republished courtesy of MIT News (web.mit.edu/newsoffice/), a popular site that covers news about MIT research, innovation and teaching.

Explore further: Beyond the bubble: Economists contemplate ways to make the risks of financial innovation more evident

Related Stories

Storing carbon in rocks may help fight against climate change

October 5, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- As climate change continues to emerge as the biggest challenge of the 21st century, the race to come up with novel ways to deal with the threat has become more urgent than ever. Carbon capture and storage ...

Broken bones and medication

October 5, 2010

Although one in four women over 50 develops osteoporosis, most are unaware they have the disease — something Professor Suzanne Cadarette would like to change.

Change needed in telecom regulation: researchers

October 6, 2010

The Internet has had an obviously revolutionary effect on the way people find and disseminate information; but it's had no less revolutionary an effect on the organization of the telecommunications industry. Where the industry ...

Faster websites, more reliable data

October 14, 2010

Today, visiting almost any major website -- checking your Facebook news feed, looking for books on Amazon, bidding for merchandise on eBay -- involves querying a database. But the databases that these sites maintain are enormous, ...

Recommended for you

Smart home heating and cooling

August 28, 2015

Smart temperature-control devices—such as thermostats that learn and adjust to pre-programmed temperatures—are poised to increase comfort and save energy in homes.

Smallest 3-D camera offers brain surgery innovation

August 28, 2015

To operate on the brain, doctors need to see fine details on a small scale. A tiny camera that could produce 3-D images from inside the brain would help surgeons see more intricacies of the tissue they are handling and lead ...

Team creates functional ultrathin solar cells

August 27, 2015

(Phys.org)—A team of researchers with Johannes Kepler University Linz in Austria has developed an ultrathin solar cell for use in lightweight and flexible applications. In their paper published in the journal Nature Materials, ...

Interactive tool lifts veil on the cost of nuclear energy

August 24, 2015

Despite the ever-changing landscape of energy economics, subject to the influence of new technologies and geopolitics, a new tool promises to root discussions about the cost of nuclear energy in hard evidence rather than ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

r80sri
not rated yet Oct 17, 2010
Full credits to Dr. Arun Majumdar for his visionary leadership of ARPA-E. His answers are prophetic and need to be taken seriously to catapult the world into a greener future.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.