Dark-matter search plunges physicists to new depths

August 11, 2010
Bell jars in the Chicagoland Observatory for Underground Particle Physics consist of a steel vessel that contains the fire-extinguishing liquid iodotrifluoromethane (CF3I). Scientists would expect to see a weakly interacting massive particle leave a single bubble, like the one at right, when it hits the nucleus of an atom in the CF3I molecule. Other types of charged particles would leave multiple bubbles, like the ones at left. Credit: Fermilab

This month physicist Juan Collar and his associates are taking their attempt to unmask the secret identity of dark matter into a Canadian mine more than a mile underground.

The team is deploying a 4-kilogram bubble chamber at SNOLab, which is part of the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory in Ontario, Canada. A second 60-kilogram chamber will follow later this year. Scientists anticipate that particles will leave bubbles in their tracks when passing through the liquid in one of these chambers.

Dark matter accounts for nearly 90 percent of all matter in the universe. Although invisible to telescopes, scientists can observe the gravitational influence that dark matter exerts over galaxies.

Pictured here is the 1-liter bubble chamber during testing at MINOS Hall, 350 feet underneath Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory. Physicists installed a similar but larger bubble chamber for detecting dark matter this summer in a laboratory more than a mile underground in Sudbury, Canada. Credit: Reidar Hahn/Fermilab

"There is a lot more mass than literally meets the eye," said Collar, Associate Professor in Physics at the University of Chicago. "When you look at the matter budget of the universe, we have a big void there that we can't explain."

Likely suspects for what constitutes dark matter include Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPS) and axions. Theorists originally proposed the existence of both these groups of to address issues unrelated to dark matter.

"These seem to be perfect to explain all of these observations that give us this evidence for dark matter, and that makes them very appealing," Collar said.

SNOLab will be the most ambitious in a series of underground locations where Collar and his colleagues have searched for dark matter. In 2004, they established the Chicagoland Observatory for Underground (COUPP) at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.

"We started with a detector the size of a test tube and now have increased the mass by a factor of more than a thousand," said Fermilab physicist Andrew Sonnenschein. "It's exciting to see the first bubble chamber being sent off to SNOLab, because the low level of interference we can expect from the there will make our search for dark matter enormously more sensitive."

Bubble-chamber technology

The COUPP collaboration consists of scientists from UChicago, Fermilab and Indiana University at South Bend. In 2008 the collaboration released its first results that established an old technology of particle physics—the bubble chamber—as a potential dark-matter detector.

COUPP extends to the city of Chicago's flood-control infrastructure, called the Deep Tunnel. The city has granted COUPP scientists access to the tunnel, 330 feet underground, to test prototypes of their instruments. The collaboration also tested instruments in a chamber 350 feet below Fermilab, and in a sub-basement of the Laboratory for Astrophysics and Space Research on the UChicago campus.

Collar continually seeks underground venues for his research in order to screen out false signals from various natural radiation sources, including cosmic rays from deep space. "It's an interesting lifestyle," Collar said.

The troublesome underground radiation sources consist of charged particles that lose energy as they traverse through a mile or more of rock. But rock has no impact on particles that interact weakly with matter, such as WIMPS, thus the move to Sudbury.

"SNOLab is a very special, spectacular place, because the infrastructure that the Canadians have developed down there is nothing short of amazing," Collar said. Even though SNOLab sits atop a working nickel mine, conditions there are pristinely antiseptic.

"As you walk in, you have to shower to remove any trace of dust," he said. "It's a clean-room atmosphere, meaning that there's essentially no specks of dust anywhere. We have to worry about such things, sources of radiation associated with dust."

Collar also is a member of the Coherent Germanium Neutrino Technology (CoGeNT) collaboration, which operates a detector that sits nearly half a mile deep at the Soudan Underground Mine State Park in northern Minnesota. The 60-kilogram detector that Collar and colleagues will install at SNOLab later this year, meanwhile, undergoes testing in a tunnel 350 feet beneath Fermilab.

Linking the two sites is an invisible beam of neutrinos that stretches 450 miles from Fermi to Soudan. The beam is part of the Main Injector Neutrino Oscillation Search (MINOS), a particle-physics experiment that is unrelated to the search for dark matter.

The two detectors rely on entirely different techniques. CoGeNT uses a new type of germanium detector that targets the detection of light WIMPS.

"Most of us have been concentrating on intermediate-mass WIMPS for decades," Collar said. "In the last few years the theoreticians have been telling us more and more, look, under these other sets of assumptions, it could be a lighter WIMP. This device is actually the first of its kind in the sense that it's targeted specifically for light WIMPS. We're seeing interesting things with it that we don't fully understand yet."

Collar estimates that it'll take a decade or more for physicists to become completely convinced that they've seen dark-matter particles.

"It's going to take a lot of information from very many different points of view and entirely independent techniques," he said. "One day we'll figure it out.

Explore further: MINOS ready to study mysterious neutrinos

Related Stories

MINOS ready to study mysterious neutrinos

February 10, 2005

A new five year research programme studying the properties of mysterious particles called neutrinos is due to start on March 4th 2005. The first neutrinos generated in a new particle accelerator beam for the Main Injector ...

Mining for dark matter

April 23, 2008

While much of the attention in the world of high-energy physics is focused on the Large Hadron Collider nearing completion at the European Center for Nuclear Research (CERN) near Geneva, Switzerland, other physicists, including ...

New Limits on the Origin of Dark Matter

January 27, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- Determining the identity of dark matter, the mysterious stuff thought to make up the vast majority of matter in the universe, is one of the most fundamental challenges facing modern physics. Through theory ...

Exploring the secrets of dark matter

February 18, 2010

Even the biggest Star Trek fan would probably have trouble understanding the technical details of the research done by Queen's University Particle Astrophysics Professor Wolfgang Rau of Kingston, Canada.

Recommended for you

A particle purely made of nuclear force

October 13, 2015

Scientists at TU Wien (Vienna) have calculated that the meson f0(1710) could be a very special particle – the long-sought-after glueball, a particle composed of pure force.

Light-optics research could improve medical imaging

October 13, 2015

A team of researchers, including The University of Queensland's Dr Joel Carpenter, has developed echo-less lights that could improve medical imaging inside the body, leading to less-intrusive surgery.

Just a touch of skyrmions

October 13, 2015

Ancient memory devices such as handwriting were based on mechanical energy—but in the modern world they have given way to devices based generally on electrical manipulation.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (6) Aug 11, 2010
Why do Dark Matter news articles come in pairs? Anyway they're looking in the wrong place.

3.7 / 5 (3) Aug 11, 2010
I know it's too late to change the name, but "dark matter" should have been called "damned matter" or "annoying matter" for all the trouble its caused.
Aug 11, 2010
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
not rated yet Aug 12, 2010
Have to agree with zslewis there. I'm all for a bit of conspiracy theorizing, however there just isn't a place for it in physics, particularly astrophysics. Interesting though that so many people do look at physics from a view that it MUST be conspiratorial. Perhaps there are just a lot of paranoid people out there.
1 / 5 (1) Aug 12, 2010
zsiewis91 - maybe you're right that I'm a joke but I'm right about the universe.

Pete83 - no conspirancy. Just a theory.

3 / 5 (2) Aug 12, 2010
Dark Matter and Dark Energy are just another way of saying that something is seriously wrong with current cosmological theories and I doubt that the fix can be found in a Canadian mine.
5 / 5 (2) Aug 12, 2010
Have to agree with zslewis there. I'm all for a bit of conspiracy theorizing, however there just isn't a place for it in physics, particularly astrophysics. Interesting though that so many people do look at physics from a view that it MUST be conspiratorial. Perhaps there are just a lot of paranoid people out there.
They are not distributed homogeneously. They are attracted by certain places and certain buzz words, thereby increasing their local density at these spots.
2.7 / 5 (3) Aug 12, 2010
Indeed Hesperos Dark Matter is the name of a mystery.
5 / 5 (3) Aug 12, 2010
Dark Matter and Dark Energy are just another way of saying that something is seriously wrong
Using DM and DE as common object is almost always just another way of saying something is not understood at all.
not rated yet Aug 15, 2010
In the old days people would be happy if a nasty question got an obvious answer in the end. Times have changed, simple answers are unwelcome, they spoil the fun and industry of looking further. Lensing of a galaxy cluster points to the option that dark matter just consists of neutrinos with mass of 1.5 eV. They will not be measured in the dark matter searches of SNOlab and alikes, but in tritium decay, KATRIN 2015. The Lambda-Cold-Dark-Matter model that excludes such high neutrino masses is obviously inconsistent without such a Cold-Dark-Matter particle.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.