The secret to sniffing out a safe supper

Jul 15, 2010

When mice smell the scent of food on the breath of their fellow mice, they use that experience to decide what's safe to eat in the future. Key in that learning process is the pairing of a particular odor with a chemical ingredient found in mouse breath, scientists knew. What they didn't know was how mice manage to sniff that connection out. According to a report published online on July 15th in Current Biology, now they do.

"It's as if the mouse were thinking something like, 'My buddy ate food that smelled just like what I have in front of me. He isn't dead. Therefore, this food must be safe to eat,'" explained Steven Munger of the University of Maryland School of Medicine in Baltimore.

"We found that a small subdivision of the —one that differs from the rest of the olfactory system in the expression of key proteins used to translate a chemical stimulus into and in the way it connects to the brain—is specialized for detecting this social stimulus," Munger said. "When function of this olfactory subsystem is disrupted, can no longer make sense of this social signal, and thus they fail to make a positive judgment about the food. We now have an answer to the question of how mice can communicate complex information just by breathing on each other."

The discovery about this portion of the olfactory system, known to experts as the GC-D necklace subsystem, adds to growing evidence that the sense of smell is in fact made up of many parts, each with a very specialized purpose.

In fact, the researchers had been studying this particular olfactory subsystem for over a decade, Munger said, but they didn't know what information it might convey to the animals about their environment. The breakthrough came after the researchers decided, based on a few hints, to test its response to carbon disulfide, a chemical ingredient in rodent breath previously linked to social learning about food.

The researchers' studies showed that the GC-D necklace subsystem responds to carbon disulfide and that mice unable to detect that component of breath failed to adjust their food selections after interacting with a "demonstrator" mouse that had just eaten chow seasoned with either cinnamon or cocoa.

Munger said that humans probably don't rely on the same system to make judgments about food, given that a key gene in GC-D neurons doesn't function in most primates. Still, people may use a similar strategy to learn from others what's good to eat. "If someone makes a grimace after taking a bite of something, you probably are not going to want to eat that food," he said.

Explore further: Birds 'weigh' peanuts and choose heavier ones

More information: Zufall et al.: “Report: An Olfactory Subsystem that Detects Carbon Disulfide and Mediates Food-Related Social Learning.” Publishing in Current Biology 20, 1-7, August 24, 2010. DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.021

Related Stories

When mice choose mates, experience counts

Mar 21, 2006

Choosing a mate is a big decision. And, at least for mice, it's one that is best made with input from one's peers. In a series of experiments designed help scientists understand the brain chemicals that guide ...

Recommended for you

Birds 'weigh' peanuts and choose heavier ones

19 hours ago

Many animals feed on seeds, acorns or nuts. The common feature of these are that they have shells and there is no direct way to know what's inside. How do the animals know how much and what quality of food ...

Estuaries protect Dungeness crabs from deadly parasites

May 22, 2015

Parasitic worms can pose a serious threat to the Dungeness crab, a commercially important fishery species found along the west coast of North America. The worms are thought to have caused or contributed to ...

An evolutionary heads-up—the brain size advantage

May 22, 2015

A larger brain brings better cognitive performance. And so it seems only logical that a larger brain would offer a higher survival potential. In the course of evolution, large brains should therefore win ...

Our bond with dogs may go back more than 27,000 years

May 21, 2015

Dogs' special relationship to humans may go back 27,000 to 40,000 years, according to genomic analysis of an ancient Taimyr wolf bone reported in the Cell Press journal Current Biology on May 21. Earlier genome ...

User comments : 0

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.