How should referees use technology in football?

July 10, 2010
How should referees use technology in football?

(PhysOrg.com) -- As World Cup 2010 looks set to be the tipping point for the use of technology in football a Cardiff University expert argues it’s justice not accuracy that’s at stake.

Professor Harry Collins, Cardiff School of Social Sciences, looks at the impact of technology on sports umpiring and refereeing in a forthcoming paper in The Journal of the Philosophy of Sport.

Professor Collins argues that the introduction of new technology should be done in such a way as to increase the justice of decisions and that this is best done with a restrained use of new technology. He writes that some sports decision aids can be less accurate than they appear, leading to false transparency.

Professor Collins said: “In the case of the 2010 World Cup it's especially important to disentangle the question of exactness and the question of justice. The increasingly vocal calls for the introduction of 'goal-line technology' often confuse the two.

“To get rid of transparent injustice all that is necessary is to give referees direct or indirect access to the television replays that the viewer sees and allow them to use these in their decision-making so as to avoid obvious mistakes. There is no need to try to find technology that will define the 'exact' position of the ball. In rare cases television replays will not be able to determine whether the whole of the ball crossed the line or not - advanced technology could resolve some but not all of such cases but there is no need for it. In such cases, referees, using TV replays, can be seen to be doing their best, especially if backed up with a 'benefit of the doubt' rule such as, 'if in irresolvable doubt, it is a goal'.”

Professor Collins concludes that should be used to avoid errors which are obvious to all; but argues that the ’s judgement must remain paramount.

Previous research by Professor Collins and colleagues in the School of Social Sciences has questioned the accuracy of Hawk-Eye and similar line-calling technologies arguing such devices could cause viewers to overestimate the ability of technological devices to resolve disagreements.

Explore further: NASA Astronaut Eileen Collins retires

More information: Read Professor Collins' research paper

Related Stories

Faking it for physicists

July 6, 2006

In a "faking it" style test, a social scientist has fooled a panel of physicist judges into believing he was an experienced gravitational wave physicist.

On demand FB cell phone replays created

September 27, 2007

People attending Purdue University home football games this fall might be the first U.S. college fans able to call up instant replays on their cell phones.

Football lags other sports on technology

June 28, 2010

High profile sports like rugby, tennis, cricket and basketball have seamlessly embraced technology to aid referees and linesmen, so why doesn't football?

Recommended for you

Just how good (or bad) is the fossil record of dinosaurs?

August 28, 2015

Everyone is excited by discoveries of new dinosaurs – or indeed any new fossil species. But a key question for palaeontologists is 'just how good is the fossil record?' Do we know fifty per cent of the species of dinosaurs ...

Fractals patterns in a drummer's music

August 28, 2015

Fractal patterns are profoundly human – at least in music. This is one of the findings of a team headed by researchers from the Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization in Göttingen and Harvard University ...

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

DeltaVee
not rated yet Jul 10, 2010
The typical argument against using replays is that the play would be interrupted (assuming there is stoppage for a review). I would propose that they continue playing while some "replay referees" review the video, and then make an announcement during the next throw in or free kick. That way, the game is not interrupted, and a goal or offside offense could be overruled appropriately.
antialias_physorg
not rated yet Jul 11, 2010
Could it be that the - unfair - denial of a goal to the ENGLISH team in the match against germany has anything to do with an ENGLISH scientists claiming "this is the tipping point" and that there are "increasing vocal calls" for this type of electronic aids.

Surely not...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.