Australia delays Internet filter to review content

July 9, 2010 By TANALEE SMITH , Associated Press Writer

(AP) -- Australia's widely criticized proposal to mandate a filter blocking child pornography and other objectionable Internet content has been delayed at least a year so the government can review what content should be restricted.

Communications Minister Stephen Conroy said Friday a 12-month review would begin this year into the filter, which would force all Australian ISPs to block a regularly updated list of websites.

If a mandatory filter is passed into law, it would make Australia one of the strictest Internet regulators among the world's democracies. Some critics have said the proposed filter would put the nation in the same league as China.

While child pornography was the main target, the filter also seeks to ban sites that included bestiality, rape and other extreme violence, as well as detailed instructions in crime, drug use or terrorist acts.

"There are some sections of the community that have expressed legitimate concerns that the (restricted content) category ... does not accurately reflect current community standards about what type of content should be refused," Conroy told reporters in Melbourne.

He also announced an annual review of the blocked sites and other measures to ensure only specific content listed under the legislation was banned.

The filter's mandatory nature, as well as a lengthy list that blocks even legal sites, has been criticized and Yahoo as heavy-handed. Even the U.S. State Department expressed concern about the restrictions.

The majority of Australia's ISPs oppose the filter. But three of the largest did agree Friday to voluntarily block online child pornography even without a mandatory filter.

Telstra, Optus and Primus said they will block a list of URLs compiled by the government's Communications and Media Authority.

The companies also welcomed the review.

"We support the review that was announced today, we support and are willing to voluntarily commit to the blocking of the list of child pornography sites and we'll continue to work constructively with the government as it undertakes this review," public policy and communications director David Quilty told reporters in Melbourne.

He said it could take several months to begin blocking the child pornography sites.

Optus official Maha Krishnapillai said the company had agreed to block child pornography where it could.

"We'll have to wait and see what the review comes out with, but we've said all the way through that this is about blocking the worst of the worst," he said.

Conroy has said the proposal was to protect Australians, especially children, from harmful material on the Internet by blocking obscene and crime-linked sites. Such material is already banned from publication on Australian sites, but the government currently has no control over it being accessed on servers overseas.

The list of banned sites would be constantly updated based on public complaints.

Karim Temsamani, managing director of Google Australia and New Zealand, said his company remained opposed to the filter and was pleased the government was planning a review. Google already blocks and removes any child pornography and reports it to authorities.

"Our primary concern has always been that the scope of the proposed filter is far too broad," Temsamani said in a statement. "It goes way beyond child sexual abuse material and would block access to important online information for all Australians."

Explore further: Australia says Web blacklist combats child porn


Related Stories

Australia says Web blacklist combats child porn

March 27, 2009

(AP) -- Australia's communications minister has defended a proposed Internet blacklist as necessary to combat child pornography but admitted that at least one site had been wrongly blocked during trials.

Australia defends controversial web filter

December 16, 2009

Australia on Wednesday dismissed as "baseless" claims it was proposing a China-style plan for mandatory filtering of the internet and denied the system could be abused to silence free speech.

Filtering truth?

December 16, 2009

( -- Plans for mandatory internet filtering in Australia may see a wide range of material disappear from computer screens, according to research led by a UNSW academic.

Australia defends mandatory Internet filter

March 14, 2010

Australia Sunday defended its plan to block some Internet content, such as that featuring child sex abuse or advocating terrorism, after a media rights watchdog warned it may hurt free speech.

US concerned by Australian Internet filter plan

March 29, 2010

(AP) -- The United States has raised concerns with Australia about the impact of a proposed Internet filter that would place restrictions on Web content, an official said Monday.

Recommended for you

IROS 2015: Thermobot feels the heat and walks (and walks)

October 7, 2015

Takeru Nemoto and Akio Yamamoto of University of Tokyo have presented a bipedal walking robot which is driven by constant heating. No sensors. No actuators, said Even Ackerman in IEEE Spectrum. Just a hot surface will do ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Jul 09, 2010
It is my fond hope that we successfully manage to vote Labor out of power in the coming election. I'm guessing this issue is going to be the deal breaker for many younger voters.
not rated yet Jul 09, 2010
"We support the review that was announced today,"

Yet another reason to boycott Bigpond, aside from the slow connection speeds that they provide. And, with the filter introduced, it'll be even slower.

But, this is just one of many bad ideas recently introduced by the labor government. The goal of the filter is to "protect" people. Because, we all know that the only way to make a problem go away is to pretend that it doesn't exist, right? Nice job Steven Conroy. Because, what children love more than Pokemon and cuddly toys is porn sites... idiots.
not rated yet Jul 09, 2010
It is my fond hope that we successfully manage to vote Labor out of power in the coming election. I'm guessing this issue is going to be the deal breaker for many younger voters.

On one hand labor is promising the NBN, and on the other its making this filter.

I don't know which way to go. We need the nbn, but the filter will reduce it to what we have now...
not rated yet Jul 09, 2010
The question remaining is whether Charybdis/new government will be anyhow better than Scylla/old government.
4 / 5 (1) Jul 09, 2010
The reasons its has been delayed is because we are about to have an election.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.