Jupiter’s moon Io is the most volcanically active body in the solar system. Could it also be a habitat for life?
When it comes to where extraterrestrial life might dwell in our own solar system, Jupiter's moon Europa often grabs the spotlight. However, its extraordinarily volcanic sibling Io might be a possible habitat as well.
A bit larger than Earth's moon, Io is the innermost of Jupiter's large satellites and the most volcanically active body in the solar system, with plumes of matter rising up to 186 miles (300 km) above the surface. This extreme activity is the result of Jupiter's powerful gravitational pull, which causes Io's tormented solid crust to bulge up and down 328 feet (100 meters) or more, generating intense heat in Io due to friction. Although the heat near the volcanoes can reach some 3000 degrees F (1649 degrees C), high enough to keep lava liquid, Io's surface temperature averages at about negative 202 degrees F (-130 degrees C), leading to sulfur dioxide snowfields. This means Io is a land of both fire and ice.
Io is generally considered a poor candidate for life because of all the radiation Jupiter blasts it with. In addition, no organic molecules have been detected on its surface, and it has only an extremely thin atmosphere devoid of detectable water vapor.
"Everyone right away tends to categorically exclude the possibility of life on Io," said astrobiologist Dirk Schulze-Makuch at Washington State University.
Still, conditions on Io might have made it a friendlier habitat in the distant past. If life did ever develop on Io, there is a chance it might have survived to the present day, Schulze-Makuch suggested.
"Life on the surface is all but impossible, but if you go down further into the rocks, it could be intriguing," he said. "We shouldn't categorize it as dead right away just because it's so extreme."
Computer models suggest Io formed in a region around Jupiter where water ice was plentiful. Io's heat, combined with the resulting possibility of liquid water, could have made life plausible.
“There must have been quite a lot of water on Io shortly after formation, judging from the amount of water ice on Europa and Ganymede,” said Schulze-Makuch.
Jupiter's radiation would have stripped this water from Io's surface, perhaps within 10 million years. At this point life could have retreated underground, where water might still be abundant, and geothermal activity and sulfur compounds could provide microbes with sufficient energy to survive.
Although no organic molecules have been detected on the moon’s surface, that does not mean they do not exist underground, Schulze-Makuch said. Any organic compounds that once existed on the surface or that may today still emanate from the subsurface -- which probably were naturally present in this region of space during Io's formation -- would get quickly destroyed by Jupiter's radiation.
The many lava tubes thought to exist on Io could serve as an especially favorable environment for life, Schulze-Makuch suggested, by protecting organisms from radiation. The lava tubes also could provide thermal insulation, trapping moisture and providing nutrients such as sulfurous compounds. Microbes are common in lava tubes on Earth, from ice and volcano zones in Iceland to hot sand-floored tubes in Saudi Arabia, and lava tubes are the most plausible cave environment for life on Mars, he added.
The primordial soup that any life on Io might have originated from was likely based on water, but the solvent of choice for organisms there might have drastically changed later on as the moon transformed. Hydrogen sulfide is one choice, as it is reasonably abundant in Io's shallow subsurface and remains liquid from negative 123 to negative 76 degrees F (-86 to -60 degrees C), falling within the environmental conditions that would prevail there. While it is not especially efficient as a solvent for ions, it does dissolve many substances, including many organic compounds. Other possibilities include sulfur dioxide and sulfuric acid.
"I'm exploring with colleagues whether sulfur compounds could work as solvents of life," Schulze-Makuch noted.
Given the wild extremes Io can swing through as it orbits Jupiter, one possible survival strategy for life in this challenging environment would be to remain dormant most of the time, only reverting back when nutrients were rich. "It'd be much easier for life to take a beating if it goes dormant regularly," Schulze-Makuch said.
Although Europa and Ganymede are higher priority targets for future exploration missions, Io should not be neglected, said Schulze-Makuch. "Much insight could be gained by sending a radiation-resistant robotic probe capable of detecting the chemistry and physical state of subsurface and surface liquids on Io," he noted, perhaps as part of a larger mission to the Jovian system.
"I know the chances of life on Io are low, and even if there is some microbial life in lava tube caves in its crust, in the short term there's no way for us to get there," he added. "But let's not totally exclude Io only because it seems strange or foreign."
If a mission to Io is extraordinarily lucky enough to find life in such an unlikely environment, "then it would make life elsewhere in the galaxy seem much more likely," Schulze-Makuch said. "It would really broaden our horizons."
Schulze-Makuch detailed his ideas in the February-March issue of the Journal of Cosmology.
Explore further:
Looking for life on Jupiter's moon Europa

Quantum_Conundrum
1 / 5 (2) Jun 10, 2010If the volcanism is blasting molten rock hundreds of miles into space, where it presumably falls back down eventually, it seems absurd to assume sub-surface water exists in any form other than steam.
gwrede
1 / 5 (2) Jun 10, 2010Skeptic_Heretic
not rated yet Jun 10, 2010The moon to the left looks yellow brown to me while the one on the right is smokey white. Check your monitor. Brightness might be too high.
kevinrtrs
1 / 5 (10) Jun 11, 2010This should be recognized for what it is: sheer speculation. Current conditions dictate that there is small chance for life even if it was there in the beginning - which is itself highly debatable. This is why most reasonable people dismiss that possiblity out of hand.
Just finding water on a planet does not imply life would be found.
Where would that life come from? We know now just how complex even the simplest cell is, so the spontaneous formation of life is virtually a guaranteed non-event. In fact finding water will be a detriment - surprising as that might sound - water by itself works against long chain organic compounds forming because of the simple chemistry of concentrations.
Life as we know it was created by the creator. Period.
Skeptic_Heretic
5 / 5 (4) Jun 11, 2010Reasonable people don't dismiss something until all the evidence is presented. Judging pre-evidence is prejudging.
We've gone through this before. When you state something that is demonstrably false, you're lying. We know that lipids form stable vesicles in aqueous solution and are permeable to monomers all of which are formed through natural processes. We know that under different thermodynamic coonditions (TBC)...
Skeptic_Heretic
5 / 5 (7) Jun 11, 2010Sorry, no creator needed. Thermodynamics, basic chemistry, and a reasonable difference in undersea currents, as well as the presence of water, makes the spontaneous assembly of self replicating biology quite easily explainable.
Direct interaction Creationism (young earth or old earth) is thoroughly disproved, empirically and sensically. You have to bury your head in the sand to think otherwise. This doesn't speak to whether there is a God or not, but it certainly shows us that we're not special, nor would any sort of God be a personal one
Scott221
5 / 5 (5) Jun 11, 2010Assuming that Io is tidally-locked to Jupiter, then the expansion/contraction of its surface (as it orbits the planet) should always occur in precisely the same locations. Thus - in an analogy to standing waves in a microwave oven - there should be some regions of the moon that stay extremely hot, some should remain extremely cold, but some should always be in a comfortable Goldilocks-zone where solvents like liquid H2O could persist...
Might be a case for life on Io after all.
freethinking
1.2 / 5 (5) Jun 11, 2010I actually hope that there is life out there... but thats another story.
Skeptic_Heretic
5 / 5 (4) Jun 11, 2010trekgeek1
5 / 5 (2) Jun 11, 2010RealScience
5 / 5 (4) Jun 11, 2010(It sure sounds like it when all those biblical folks carry on conversations with the creator).
And if it takes a living intelligent creator to create life, then who created your creator?
If you really have an open mind and want to know how the world works, this forum is a good place.
But if you 'know' that biology, geology astronomy, physics, etc. are all very wrong and the earth is really young, then please don't bother people here.
After all, we don't go onto religious forums and bother people by discussing radio-isotope dating, etc.
Gods_Doc
not rated yet Jun 13, 2010This article is simply stating that from minerals in the soil, organisms could have been formed, the volcanoes and atmosphere could have breathed the "breath of life" into them.
Why must science and faith always be at odds with one another? TBC
Gods_Doc
not rated yet Jun 13, 2010Scientist still can't prove how the universe was created, niether can christians. Scientists have theories (beliefs) and christians have beliefs (theories).
To my fellow christians: had it not been for scientists, we would be holding services in damp caves by torch light rather than our lighted, air conditioned churches. We have enjoyed thousands of years as an only child, we should not throw tantrums at the possability of discovering that we have a baby brother.
Thank you for your patiencs during my rant.
freethinking
1 / 5 (3) Jun 13, 2010trekgeek1
5 / 5 (1) Jun 13, 2010You show your ignorance brilliantly in that comment. Atheists don't believe in a god. Done, that's it, end of game. Anything else after that is the belief of an individual. An Atheist may believe in life outside of earth or they may not. It all depends on their scientific opinions on whether conditions necessary for life are present elsewhere in the universe. Even if that first part wasn't nonsense, what connection would making things up as you go have with life outside of earth? Your last line was intended only as an insult you unctuous, sniveling, christian. See, not very civil, is it?
freethinking
1 / 5 (4) Jun 13, 2010trekgeek1
5 / 5 (1) Jun 13, 2010simonl
1 / 5 (2) Jun 14, 2010tj10
1 / 5 (4) Jun 14, 2010tj10
1 / 5 (4) Jun 14, 2010tj10
1 / 5 (4) Jun 14, 2010freethinking
1 / 5 (3) Jun 14, 2010I'm all for space exploration and I don't think this has anything to do about evolution.
Arguing the point that it is a waste of money MIGHT be a good point, as there might not be life, though I disagree.