Easter Island discovery sends archaeologists back to drawing board

May 12, 2010

Archaeologists have disproved the fifty-year-old theory underpinning our understanding of how the famous stone statues were moved around Easter Island.

Fieldwork led by researchers at University College London and The University of Manchester, has shown the remote Pacific island's ancient road system was primarily ceremonial and not solely built for transportation of the figures.

A of roads up to 800-years-old crisscross the Island between the hat and statue quarries and the coastal areas.

Laying alongside the roads are dozens of the statues- or moai.

The find will create controversy among the many archaeologists who have dedicated years to finding out exactly how the moai were moved, ever since Norwegian adventurer Thor Heyerdahl first published his theory in 1958.

Heyerdahl and subsequent researchers believed that statues he found lying on their backs and faces near the roads were abandoned during transportation by the ancient Polynesians.

But his theory has been completely rejected by the team led by Manchester's Dr Colin Richards and UCL's Dr Sue Hamilton.

Instead, their discovery of stone platforms associated with each fallen moai - using specialist 'geophysical survey' equipment - finally confirms a little known 1914 theory of British archaeologist Katherine Routledge that the routes were primarily ceremonial avenues.

The statues, say the Manchester and UCL team just back from the island, merely toppled from the platforms with the passage of time.

"The truth of the matter is, we will never know how the statues were moved," said Dr Richards.

"Ever since Heyerdahl, archeologists have come up with all manner of theories - based on an underlying assumption that the roads were used for transportation of the moai, from the quarry at the volcanic cone Rano Raraku.

"What we do now know is that the roads had a ceremonial function to underline their religious and cultural importance.

"They lead - from different parts of the island - to the Rano Raraku volcano where the Moai were quarried.

"Volcano cones were considered as points of entry to the underworld and mythical origin land Hawaiki.

"Hence, Rano Ranaku was not just a quarry but a sacred centre of the island."

The previous excavation found that the roads are concave in shape -making it difficult to move heavy objects along them

And as the roads approach Rano Raraku, the statues become more frequent - which the team say, indicated an increasing grades of holiness.

"All the evidence strongly shows that these roads were ceremonial - which backs the work of Katherine Routledge from almost 100 years ago, " said Dr Sue Hamilton.

"It all makes sense: the moai face the people walking towards the volcano.

"The statues are more frequent the closer they are to the volcano - which has to be way of signifying the increasing levels of importance."

She added: "What is shocking is that Heyerdahl actually found some evidence to suggest there were indeed platforms.

"But like many other , he was so swayed by his cast iron belief that the roads were for transportation - he completely ignored them."

Explore further: New Easter Island theory presented

Related Stories

New Easter Island theory presented

December 6, 2005

A University of Hawaii anthropologist and colleagues are blaming rats and Dutch traders for the mysterious abandonment of Easter Island.

Study: Some forest roads bad for wildlife

October 31, 2006

A U.S. study suggests forest roads used for such activities as logging or mineral removal can negatively affect wildlife for long periods of time.

New clues in Easter Island hat mystery

September 7, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- A team of archaeologists has come one step closer to unravelling the mystery of how the famous statues dotting the landscape of a tiny Pacific island acquired their distinctive red hats.

Recommended for you

From a very old skeleton, new insights on ancient migrations

October 9, 2015

Three years ago, a group of researchers found a cave in Ethiopia with a secret: it held the 4,500-year-old remains of a man, with his head resting on a rock pillow, his hands folded under his face, and stone flake tools surrounding ...

Mexican site yields new details of sacrifice of Spaniards

October 9, 2015

It was one of the worst defeats in one of history's most dramatic conquests: Only a year after Hernan Cortes landed in Mexico, hundreds of people in a Spanish-led convey were captured, sacrificed and apparently eaten.

Ancient genome from Africa sequenced for the first time

October 8, 2015

The first ancient human genome from Africa to be sequenced has revealed that a wave of migration back into Africa from Western Eurasia around 3,000 years ago was up to twice as significant as previously thought, and affected ...

Who you gonna trust? How power affects our faith in others

October 6, 2015

One of the ongoing themes of the current presidential campaign is that Americans are becoming increasingly distrustful of those who walk the corridors of power – Exhibit A being the Republican presidential primary, in which ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

3.7 / 5 (6) May 12, 2010
So who's proved that the "ceremonial" roads were not also used to transport the moi? Their being concave might actually assist in maintaining direction of unattached rollers under the statues.
3.3 / 5 (3) May 12, 2010
Or the roads could have been built for the moai initially, and hundreds of years of later ceremonial foot traffic may have worn down the middle of the roads.
2.3 / 5 (3) May 13, 2010
I thinks it's clear the aliens made them.
1 / 5 (1) May 13, 2010
I see where they have evidence that the moai were intentionally placed along the road, but where is the evidence that the roads were used for ceremonial purposes. Why do we always assume that these "primitive" cultures only seem to accomplish anything for ceremony? It makes more sense to me that an advanced culture that can carve and transport these huge stones may have a bit more purpose and complexity than that.
1 / 5 (1) May 13, 2010
It makes more sense to me that an advanced culture that can carve and transport these huge stones may have a bit more purpose and complexity than that.
What exactly could that bit of more purpose have been? I can't imagine any practical need for roads there.
3 / 5 (2) May 13, 2010
I'm not well studied in the inhabitants of E Island.

Did they have the wheel? Without the wheel, using roads for transportation is a fairly weak assumption as the purpose for roads within cultures with the wheel was to make the surface smooth for the wheel, not the traveler, like the phoenicians and etruscans. In cultures without the wheel, typically the roads are more ceremonial and not as robust or engineered, like the Olmecs.
not rated yet May 23, 2010
It was placed there by alien gods. It's just a bit of art. The residents tried to give it a go, to copy their 'gods'.. but failed miserably. The island is too small to support the manpower required to actually build these things. They'd have to be working for centuries. Which would mean that several generations would have to dedicate thier lives to it. And you still need others to hunt, cook, raise children etc.. sorry.. no native civilisation built these.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.