(PhysOrg.com) -- Spray-on liquid glass is transparent, non-toxic, and can protect virtually any surface against almost any damage from hazards such as water, UV radiation, dirt, heat, and bacterial infections. The coating is also flexible and breathable, which makes it suitable for use on an enormous array of products.
The liquid glass spray (technically termed “SiO2 ultra-thin layering”) consists of almost pure silicon dioxide (silica, the normal compound in glass) extracted from quartz sand. Water or ethanol is added, depending on the type of surface to be coated. There are no additives, and the nano-scale glass coating bonds to the surface because of the quantum forces involved. According to the manufacturers, liquid glass has a long-lasting antibacterial effect because microbes landing on the surface cannot divide or replicate easily.
Liquid glass was invented in Turkey and the patent is held by Nanopool, a family-owned German company. Research on the product was carried out at the Saarbrücken Institute for New Materials. Nanopool is already in negotiations in the UK with a number of companies and with the National Health Service, with a view to its widespread adoption.
The liquid glass spray produces a water-resistant coating only around 100 nanometers (15-30 molecules) thick. On this nanoscale the glass is highly flexible and breathable. The coating is environmentally harmless and non-toxic, and easy to clean using only water or a simple wipe with a damp cloth. It repels bacteria, water and dirt, and resists heat, UV light and even acids. UK project manager with Nanopool, Neil McClelland, said soon almost every product you purchase will be coated with liquid glass.
Food processing companies in Germany have already carried out trials of the spray, and found sterile surfaces that usually needed to be cleaned with strong bleach to keep them sterile needed only a hot water rinse if they were coated with liquid glass. The levels of sterility were higher for the glass-coated surfaces, and the surfaces remained sterile for months.
Other organizations, such as a train company and a hotel chain in the UK, and a hamburger chain in Germany, are also testing liquid glass for a wide range of uses. A year-long trial of the spray in a Lancashire hospital also produced “very promising” results for a range of applications including coatings for equipment, medical implants, catheters, sutures and bandages. The war graves association in the UK is investigating using the spray to treat stone monuments and grave stones, since trials have shown the coating protects against weathering and graffiti. Trials in Turkey are testing the product on monuments such as the Ataturk Mausoleum in Ankara.
The liquid glass coating is breathable, which means it can be used on plants and seeds. Trials in vineyards have found spraying vines increases their resistance to fungal diseases, while other tests have shown sprayed seeds germinate and grow faster than untreated seeds, and coated wood is not attacked by termites. Other vineyard applications include coating corks with liquid glass to prevent “corking” and contamination of wine. The spray cannot be seen by the naked eye, which means it could also be used to treat clothing and other materials to make them stain-resistant. McClelland said you can “pour a bottle of wine over an expensive silk shirt and it will come right off”.
In the home, spray-on glass would eliminate the need for scrubbing and make most cleaning products obsolete. Since it is available in both water-based and alcohol-based solutions, it can be used in the oven, in bathrooms, tiles, sinks, and almost every other surface in the home, and one spray is said to last a year.
Liquid glass spray is perhaps the most important nanotechnology product to emerge to date. It will be available in DIY stores in Britain soon, with prices starting at around £5 ($8 US). Other outlets, such as many supermarkets, may be unwilling to stock the products because they make enormous profits from cleaning products that need to be replaced regularly, and liquid glass would make virtually all of them obsolete.
Explore further:
Nanotechnology Product for Car Windshields Now Available in the USA
More information:
Nanopool: www.nanopool.eu/couk/index.htm
• Join PhysOrg.com on Facebook!
• Follow PhysOrg.com on Twitter!

ThomasS
Feb 02, 2010CreepyD
5 / 5 (5) Feb 02, 2010They were able to spray something onto shoes (as an example) -They previously soaked up water, but after treating, water just rolled off.
mrlewish
Feb 02, 2010shinobue111
2.9 / 5 (14) Feb 02, 2010Oh please, it's silicon oxide! we've been using it for centuries.. no potential for poisonous effects cause its GLASS
magpies
Feb 02, 2010Zander
3.3 / 5 (12) Feb 02, 2010seamlessly non toxic products, when formed into nano-particles, can be toxic. take TiO2 for example, its a non toxic salt, but the TiO2 nano-particles can penetrate through the skin and cause organ damage. [http://www.ncbi.n...alpos=14]
Doug_Huffman
4.1 / 5 (11) Feb 02, 2010Topperfalkon
Feb 02, 2010fourthrocker
2.9 / 5 (9) Feb 02, 2010antialias
3.9 / 5 (11) Feb 02, 2010I can see it being useful in many technical areas, though. I'd have no problem with tables at restaurants or toilets being coated with this stuff.
But before we start spraying corn fields or covering our kitchen knives with this I'd like some more research to be done on the long term health aspects.
Doug_Huffman
3.5 / 5 (8) Feb 02, 2010Up jump the precautionary principle principal devil - in the details! Care to comment on hormesis and homeopathy? Stuff with no side-effects generally has no effect at all.
rproulx45
3.9 / 5 (7) Feb 02, 2010deatopmg
4.6 / 5 (14) Feb 02, 2010Ever hear of silicosis caused by inhaling crystalline silica?
Skeptic_Heretic
4.3 / 5 (9) Feb 02, 2010El_Nose
Feb 02, 2010LKD
4.4 / 5 (8) Feb 02, 2010CouchP
Feb 02, 2010winthrom
4.5 / 5 (10) Feb 02, 2010Mr_Man
1.8 / 5 (6) Feb 02, 2010OR maybe, because Silicon is so similar to Carbon, could this stuff easily enter the blood stream through the lungs like Carbon Dioxide?
Skeptic_Heretic
4.5 / 5 (8) Feb 02, 2010MikeKier
3.3 / 5 (4) Feb 02, 2010derricka
3.9 / 5 (8) Feb 02, 2010TJ_alberta
5 / 5 (2) Feb 02, 2010http://www.nanopo...load.htm
Crucialitis
3 / 5 (3) Feb 02, 2010tothal
1.7 / 5 (3) Feb 02, 2010NotAsleep
4.3 / 5 (3) Feb 02, 2010Sounds like someone invented a snake oil that really works...
leed25d
Feb 02, 2010Parsec
2.5 / 5 (4) Feb 02, 2010Asbestosis is caused by mechanical damage to the lungs. The lungs cannot get rid of it or the damaged cells. This stuff really does sound like it has the potential to cause similar types of lung damage. Really.
bfast
3.5 / 5 (4) Feb 02, 2010I've been watching new technologies pop into existance for half a century. If 10% of the hype proved to be true we'd be miles ahead. Sheut, I remember when the segue was going to replace all cars, and when the internet was going to make all retail obsolete. This stuff might prove to be a bit useful, but it would shock the death out of me if cleaners became obsolete over it. Not all that "really works", i'd say.
Crucialitis
4 / 5 (3) Feb 02, 2010The fundamentals that both of those examples mention are growing and expanding into the industry.
Rome wasn't built in a day.
VOR
5 / 5 (2) Feb 02, 2010Mercury_01
5 / 5 (2) Feb 02, 2010NotAsleep
4 / 5 (2) Feb 02, 2010I've always hated tupperware. I'm glad they've finally come up with a product I can spray directly on my food to preserve it. Just kidding... or am I? Yea, probably just kidding
fixer
5 / 5 (1) Feb 02, 2010frajo
1.8 / 5 (5) Feb 02, 2010Quantum_Conundrum
1 / 5 (1) Feb 02, 2010This has so many applications that it would be like the Morgan Freeman "Chain Reaction" movie...we're talking total upheaval of world economics.
Does anyone realize how many people this will put out of work within a year or two if you need a mere fraction of the number of household and commercial cleansers, and clothing never gets stained?
I don't want to be a pesimist because I'm a big fan on nano-tech and have even proposed things like this in the past not exactly in detail, but similar in concept, BUT silicon dioxide actually is VERY dangerous when inhaled...yeah someone already mentioned silicosis...
I also think it's a terrible idea to spray crops in the field with this...maybe the trunks and branches of fruit and nut trees, but regular veggies no. Just not a good idea to eat glass.
fixer
1 / 5 (2) Feb 02, 2010Its been around as long as me!
Quantum_Conundrum
4.5 / 5 (2) Feb 02, 2010I mean, imagine your car...you could even have a layer of glass on top of the paint so that the paint lasts much longer, and never waxing...
You could spray a layer over the studs, joists, and rafters in conventional stick houses, making the house resistant to mildew, termites, ants, and even cockroaches.
Shipping might benefit from this in being able to coat the bottoms of ships in a layer which woudl prevent barnacles and other sea creatures from attaching themselves to the hull.
And yeah, anything metalic that is normally painted could probably be coated in this instead, including large things like bridges that are normally too expensive to keep re-painting...
So many potential uses...
Like everyone else says, "too good to be true".
There's almost certainly something going to be dangerous about it. Imagine if you got this stuff in your eyes...
Caliban
1.8 / 5 (4) Feb 02, 2010This will mean that it will be "fast-tracked" for retail in US as well, and I would be surprised, indeed, if it was not available within 6 months. The thing we should all bear in mind is that there is money to be made here-and lots of it- so all other considerations will be ignored. Since it is almost certain that no pre-market testing has been performed regarding this product's safety, the likelihood of anyone ever being found at fault for any(almost certain) adverse health effects are next to zero. That's the kind of world we live in. Get used to it.
EvgenijM
4.6 / 5 (5) Feb 02, 2010And that is very good. That's how humanity progressed so far - many jobs become obsolete after introduction of new technologies. There will certainly come a time, when people simply don't need to work to sustain their lives and can spend their time for whatever they like.
adamg
4.4 / 5 (5) Feb 02, 2010Since it is not in powder form, unless you intentionally inhale it all the time, you aren't going to get silicosis from its use.
Finally, because it is completely biologically harmless, your body can easily take care of any particles that you may encounter (your lungs are filled with cilia for this exact purpose). The safety claim is valid--whether or not the product works as advertised should be the only real concern here.
otto1923
1.5 / 5 (2) Feb 02, 2010Caliban
Feb 02, 2010otto1923
Feb 02, 2010Supermegadope
2 / 5 (1) Feb 02, 2010Silicosis is a disabling, nonreversible and sometimes fatal lung disease caused by overexposure to respirable crystalline silica. Silica exposure remains a serious threat to nearly two million US workers. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) reports that each year more than 250 die from silicosis and hundreds more are disabled. There is no cure for the disease.
jimbo92107
5 / 5 (2) Feb 02, 2010Caliban
1.7 / 5 (3) Feb 02, 2010merthin
3 / 5 (3) Feb 02, 2010nuge
2 / 5 (1) Feb 02, 2010I'd like to hear more about its potential for radiation shielding. I'd guess its a lot lighter than lead. Sounds like it could be useful in space.
Nartoon
2.5 / 5 (2) Feb 03, 2010retrosurf
not rated yet Feb 03, 2010for 9 months, without refrigeration. And you can
preserve wood with it. And coat masonry with it.
Oh wait, that's water glass, also known as sodium silicate. Huh. That technology is a hundred years old.
Hell. Call it nano-stuff. They'll buy it for sure.
abadaba
5 / 5 (1) Feb 03, 2010MadMikeScott
not rated yet Feb 03, 2010knightcap
not rated yet Feb 03, 2010Wonder what would happen if you spray some in your eye?
Could be a neat hair spray too.
It keeps things clean? Perhaps I'll spray my hamster.
Does it make things really slippery? you could spray your concrete driveway and make an adhoc ice skating ring, or better yet, a round about - or down a steep road and make a sled, could work on a spiral staircase too.
So, its breathable heh? Lets see what the first person who tries chroming with it has to say.
neo_kefka
not rated yet Feb 03, 2010pete_dl
5 / 5 (2) Feb 03, 2010LKD
not rated yet Feb 03, 2010holders66
not rated yet Feb 03, 2010karmal64
not rated yet Feb 03, 2010karmal64
not rated yet Feb 03, 2010Don't waste your time arguing with people who've already made up their minds about something they know nothing about. It'll drive you as nuts as they probably already are.
absin
5 / 5 (1) Feb 03, 2010Royale
not rated yet Feb 03, 2010PMende
not rated yet Feb 03, 2010trekgeek1
not rated yet Feb 03, 2010otto1923
1 / 5 (1) Feb 03, 2010http://www.consum...lon.html
-I'm not sure if Stainmaster or Scotchgard contain teflon or related materials; the article mentions them though. Stuff might be good for smokers, to coat their lungs and allow crud to be ejected more easily? (either way you die)
theknifeman
not rated yet Feb 03, 2010M4l4
not rated yet Feb 03, 2010Caliban
1 / 5 (2) Feb 03, 2010PMende
not rated yet Feb 03, 2010Teflon itself is one of the most chemically inert compounds known to humanity. If it is improperly cured/synthesized, of course there can be a problem, but not with PTFE itself.
Uh... The strong force? You're making a joke, right? Please tell me you're joking.
nothxkbi
not rated yet Feb 04, 2010Royale
not rated yet Feb 04, 2010Skeptic_Heretic
5 / 5 (1) Feb 04, 2010So you think a spray on glass material will put a glass protectant out of business? People use rainex because it stop water from adhering to imperfection in the glass of your windshield. Putting a second, thinner pane of glass in place will not replace glass protectants.
Royale
1 / 5 (1) Feb 04, 2010Skeptic_Heretic
not rated yet Feb 04, 2010Suchros
not rated yet Feb 05, 2010They better get an idea how to remove the stuff, or they better spray every monument, like, yesterday. Just saying, and this in 30 seconds of thinking abuse-potential... Spraying crops-troll? How can anything grow inside glass huh ? They sell those neat buddha-shaped pears in Japan though.
El_Nose
5 / 5 (5) Feb 05, 2010my original post was
I am from Michigan and had no clue to what he was referring ... a couple posts later someone explained he meant ... Rust
the moderators have gone a little overboard if you can't ask a question on here... and its termed Pointless Verbiage
Royale
5 / 5 (2) Feb 05, 2010otto1923
1 / 5 (1) Feb 05, 2010otto1923
1 / 5 (1) Feb 05, 2010Royale
1 / 5 (1) Feb 05, 2010Javinator
5 / 5 (2) Feb 05, 2010UV radiation shielding is much different than shielding from gammas. You don't use lead for sunblock. You don't put sunblock on spacecraft.
FastEddy
not rated yet Feb 05, 2010Oh, please: Just use electrostatic powder coating techniques or similar = no waste, no airborne dust, no sucky, no blowey ... stand back and let the robot in the bubble do it.
KB6
not rated yet Feb 06, 2010But how much are gemstones *truly* worth?
Slick
5 / 5 (1) Feb 06, 2010Fazer
not rated yet Feb 07, 2010The adhesion between the particles is likely from the 'Van Der Waals force', where deformation of molecules creates slightly positive and negative regions on the surface of each molecule which then attract the oppositely charged regions on neighboring molecules. What I don't understand is how they keep the molecules from sticking together while still in the bottle. Why would water keep them soluble when it doesn't interfere with the Van Der Waals force. Geckos and frogs do just fine in water!
maybeperfect
not rated yet Feb 07, 2010The product seems to be one of possibly thousands sequestered by the elite, which could have made our planet a wonderland of discovery and promise, instead of the hellish parody of Mordor it has increasingly more obviously become.
SmartK8
1 / 5 (2) Feb 07, 2010Edylc
5 / 5 (1) Feb 07, 2010Come on, this is pretty cool.
wawadave
5 / 5 (1) Feb 07, 2010zbarlici
1 / 5 (1) Feb 08, 2010gotta admit that the applications for this amazing technology would be awesome! I also gotta admit that i`ve looked into the whole "nanotechnology" thing and i was quite shocked to find out that some nanoparticles are on a scale of thousands of times smaller than our body`s organic cell. Easy enough for the nanoparticles to infiltrate and screw with your DNA. WHO THE HELL NEEDS THAT?
zbarlici
1 / 5 (1) Feb 08, 2010...and yet hundreds of products in use by the public ALREADY employ the use of nanoparticles... and if the stuff gets in your lungs, how is it different from asbestos?
All-in-all Nanotech studies should not be hampered, but safety cannot be disregarded either.
illicit
Feb 08, 2010localcooling
1 / 5 (1) Feb 08, 2010ancible
not rated yet Feb 08, 2010http://www.techno...sNum=481
Fazer
not rated yet Feb 08, 2010hapticz
1 / 5 (1) Feb 09, 2010SentinelWolf
2.3 / 5 (3) Feb 09, 2010billpoet
5 / 5 (1) Feb 09, 2010http://allpoetry..../3239956
Unlimited123
not rated yet Feb 09, 2010On surface this appears to be a fantastic do it all product, invention.
antialias
not rated yet Feb 09, 2010otto1923
1 / 5 (1) Feb 09, 2010http://www.scienc...1922.htm
-Less fattening too-
yotvata
not rated yet Feb 09, 2010kickass
not rated yet Feb 09, 2010NanolabOne
not rated yet Feb 10, 2010Royale
not rated yet Feb 12, 2010RJ32
5 / 5 (1) Feb 14, 2010stealthc
5 / 5 (1) Feb 21, 2010