Chemicals suspected in breast cancer, US experts want tests

February 20, 2010

US experts called Friday for toxicity tests on chemicals they suspect play a role in the development of breast cancer, a leading cause of death in American women.

"We're currently not identifying chemicals that could be contributing to the risk of breast cancer," said Megan Schwarzman, a physician and environmental health researcher at the University of California, Berkeley.

According to Schwarzman, only a handful of the more than 200 chemicals in the environment linked to mammary tumors in lab animals have been regulated by the US authorities "on the basis of their ability to cause breast cancer."

She was speaking at a major science gathering, the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in San Diego.

Schwarzman is part of a panel of experts set up last year to identify which chemicals cause breast cancer and to develop tests to identify them.

The Breast Cancer Policy Project is expected to submit a report to health authorities in April.

As the incidence of the most common in women has skyrocketed in a generation, a flurry of studies have looked into the role of chemicals in breast cancer.

Treatment and survival rates have improved, but scientists have been running to stand still when it comes to pinpointing what causes breast cancer, said panel member Sarah Janssen, a physician and scientist with the Natural Resources Defense Council.

"Although we've made great strides in improving treatment and breast cancer survival rates, really we don't know much about preventing breast cancer... and most of the causes are not well understood," she said, noting hypotheses that environmental exposure affects breast development and the risk of disease.

"People are exposed to dozens of chemicals in their daily activities and biomonitoring has detected hundreds of chemicals in the fetal cord blood, in breast milk, adult blood and urine."

Only around a quarter of more than 186,000 women diagnosed with breast cancer in 2005 were genetically predisposed to the disease, and other risk factors, including the early onset puberty in girls, have been linked to chemicals.

Explore further: Breast cancer study halted

Related Stories

Breast cancer study halted

June 20, 2007

The U.S. National Cancer Institute halted a $100 million study of drugs designed to prevent breast cancer in women at risk for the disease.

Breast cancer prognosis runs in the family

June 29, 2007

The chances of developing breast cancer are to some extent inherited, but important new findings suggest survival also runs in the family. Research published in the online journal Breast Cancer Research suggests that if a ...

No need for gene screens in breast cancer families

July 23, 2008

Research reported today should provide relief to women who are worried after a relative's breast cancer diagnosis. The study in the open access journal BMC Cancer shows that a family history of breast cancer does not give ...

Recommended for you

How the finch changes its tune

August 3, 2015

Like top musicians, songbirds train from a young age to weed out errors and trim variability from their songs, ultimately becoming consistent and reliable performers. But as with human musicians, even the best are not machines. ...

Machine Translates Thoughts into Speech in Real Time

December 21, 2009

( -- By implanting an electrode into the brain of a person with locked-in syndrome, scientists have demonstrated how to wirelessly transmit neural signals to a speech synthesizer. The "thought-to-speech" process ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Feb 20, 2010
I'm very suspicious of people looking to find a chemical to ban, just because it may or may not give a rat cancer when injected with mega doses. After the swine flu fiasco, I don't trust anything the current U.S. government officials would say about any health issue.
not rated yet Feb 21, 2010
I would go the opposite way and say I wouldn't trust the government to say any particular chemical is safe. Many thousands of chemicals are legacy chemicals that were grandfathered in before the environmental laws were put into effect. I would rather we test them
not rated yet Feb 22, 2010
Aspartame http://world-wire...51,etc.) caused more mammary tumors in original studies than it did brain tumors. Aspartame breaks down to diketopiperazine, a brain tumor agent. In 2005 Dr. Soffritti (Ramazzini Studies, Italy) did a study on aspartame and proved that it is a multipotential carcinogen. A couple of years later he published another study showing aspartame causes mammary tumors, breast cancer, and it not only takes but a small amount of aspartame to do it, but also can be passed on to the woman's offspring if she uses it during pregnancy and the baby survives. Aspartame also is an abortifacient and teratogen causing birth defects and mental retardation. Dr. Adrian Gross, FDA toxicologist, told Congress in 1985 that aspartame violates the Delaney Amendment which forbids putting anything in food that causes cancer. Aspartame is a cumulative poison. Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum,,,
not rated yet Feb 23, 2010
And that would be why I don't drink diet drinks... and don't use Sweet-n-Deadly in my coffee...
not rated yet Feb 23, 2010
Incidentally, have there been studies on other sweeteners, like sucralose and sacharrin?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.