Behavioral identification can help stop terrorists like Abdul Mutallab, researcher says

January 6, 2010
Behavioral science techniques could have prevented Farouk Abdul Mutallab from boarding Northwest Flight 253 on Christmas Day, says UB security researcher Mark Frank.

( -- The effective use of multiple layers of intelligence gathering, including existing behavioral identification programs, could have excluded the murderous Farouk Abdul Mutallab from travel before he got anywhere near Northwest Flight 253.

So says University at Buffalo behavioral scientist and researcher Mark G. Frank, PhD, who explains, that although Mutallab got through some security levels, "Behavioral science techniques could have detected him once he got to the airport."

Frank says, "There have been many scientific advances in technology coupled with understanding such people and their behavior -- and programs exist that put that into action -- to help identify them. Unfortunately, they are not being used widely enough."

Frank, who has advised on behavioral identification programs with the Department of Homeland Security, agrees with security experts who maintain that security is best achieved in a layered approach to the examination of would-be .

"No single security technique, on its own, is a panacea, although that would be great," Frank says. "But no technique need be 100 percent accurate to be deployed effectively. Each imperfect layer complements the next because the goals of security screening are actually more modest than people assume.

"The goals are, first, to employ intelligence and investigatory processes to dissuade or disrupt a would-be terrorist from traveling at all," he says.

If a terrorist suspect gets through the first layer of security and travels anyway, Frank says, then the goal is to force him or her into a group marked for intense secondary screening.

"At this point," Frank says, "there exist excellent scientific techniques to spot such suspects, and they don't employ ethnic screening or the random screening of passengers, processes that are not effective and to which Americans object.

"We ignore these scientific techniques at our peril," he says.

Frank points out that multiple layers of security each have strengths and weaknesses, and any layer is able under some circumstances to identify a terrorist, "So it is necessary to put resources into each layer."

One such layer uses effective behavioral techniques, and includes the Department of Homeland Security's SPOT and FAST programs.

"Both of these are observational systems with strong scientific foundations that are effective in identifying suspicious behaviors and strongly increase the odds that a would-be terrorist would be forced into yet another level of scrutiny."

Frank, an original member of the FBI's Terrorism Research and Analysis Project (TRAP), which combines academic researchers with counter-terrorism professionals, serves as a consultant to the Department of Homeland Security for the SPOT and FAST programs.

"SPOT (Screening of Passengers by Observation Technique)," he says, "is a behavioral observation technique employed by Transportation Security Administration. It is based upon a successful Israeli program derived from that country's direct experiences with terrorists and current behavioral science.

"FAST -- an acronym for Future Attribute Screening Technology -- is a sensor-based program currently in development that reads body reactions indicative of hostile intention and uses these to develop stronger algorithmic predictions as to whom should be sent on to additional screening.

"Both programs should be applauded for seeking the strong, direct involvement of scientists and both have benefited accordingly. Appropriately utilized, I believe they would have permitted us to spot the Northwest Airlines terrorist," he says.

"The immutable fact is that any effective international terrorist security system must address myriad psychological, social and political issues," Frank says.

"The cause of terrorism and its cures are very complex and require a multi-layered and multi-pronged approach," he says, "but I want to emphasize that we already have many of the technologies and techniques -- with more to come -- vetted by scientific research, to better identify and stop these people all along the way."

Frank is an associate professor of communication at UB, where he serves on the advisory board of the Center for Unified Biometrics and Sensors. He has published research in nonverbal communication and deception, and has worked with many government agencies on interviewing and deception detection through research and training. His research has been funded by the , Department of Defense and the National Science Foundation and he has consulted with, advised or trained members of law enforcement, security and judicial agencies throughout the world.

Explore further: NASA signs homeland security agreement

Related Stories

NASA signs homeland security agreement

December 15, 2005

NASA and Homeland Security officials have signed a memorandum of understanding to collaborate and coordinate research and development projects.

Menace in a bottle: Detecting liquid explosives

October 2, 2007

After the plot to blow up trans-Atlantic airlines with liquid explosives was uncovered in London in August 2006, there has been pressure on the airline industry, and Homeland Security, to find new ways to not only detect ...

Technology would help detect terrorists before they strike

October 5, 2007

Are you a terrorist? Airport screeners, customs agents, police officers and members of the military who silently pose that question to people every day, may soon have much more than intuition to depend on to determine the ...

Airport security measures not backed by solid evidence

December 21, 2007

There is no solid evidence that the huge amounts of money spent on airport security screening measures since September 11th are effective, argue researchers in this week’s Christmas issue of the BMJ.

STOP terrorism software

February 25, 2008

Researchers at the University of Maryland’s Institute for Advanced Computer Studies (UMIACS) have developed the SOMA Terror Organization Portal (STOP) allowing analysts to query automatically learned rules on terrorist ...

Recommended for you

How the finch changes its tune

August 3, 2015

Like top musicians, songbirds train from a young age to weed out errors and trim variability from their songs, ultimately becoming consistent and reliable performers. But as with human musicians, even the best are not machines. ...

Machine Translates Thoughts into Speech in Real Time

December 21, 2009

( -- By implanting an electrode into the brain of a person with locked-in syndrome, scientists have demonstrated how to wirelessly transmit neural signals to a speech synthesizer. The "thought-to-speech" process ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Jan 06, 2010
Well if the security officials had listened to the father who said he was a terrorist, he wouldn't have been allowed to board.
If the security official had refused him boarding because he had no passport, then he wouldn't have been on the plane.
If airport security gave him additional screening because he was a muslim without baggage, with a one way ticket.

It may not be pollitically correct but to be safe we need to Profile, profile, profile. A 90 year old white, black, Japanese, Indian grandma with three grandchildren in tow is not likely to plant a bomb. A 25 year old muslim, with a one way ticket, from a third world country, without passport or baggage most likely is.

Again not being pollitically correct but the truth is we can blame most of the screening we now face at airports on Muslims. Every plane that has been blown up in the last 30 years, the terrorists have been muslims.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.