Professor Gershon Galil of the department of biblical studies at the University of Haifa has deciphered an inscription dating from the 10th century BCE (the period of King David's reign), and has shown that this is a Hebrew inscription. The discovery makes this the earliest known Hebrew writing. The significance of this breakthrough relates to the fact that at least some of the biblical scriptures were composed hundreds of years before the dates presented today in research.
Prof. Gershon Galil of the University of Haifa who deciphered the inscription: "It indicates that the Kingdom of Israel already existed in the 10th century BCE and that at least some of the biblical texts were written hundreds of years before the dates presented in current research."
A breakthrough in the research of the Hebrew scriptures has shed new light on the period in which the Bible was written. Prof. Gershon Galil of the Department of Biblical Studies at the University of Haifa has deciphered an inscription dating from the 10th century BCE (the period of King David's reign), and has shown that this is a Hebrew inscription. The discovery makes this the earliest known Hebrew writing. The significance of this breakthrough relates to the fact that at least some of the biblical scriptures were composed hundreds of years before the dates presented today in research and that the Kingdom of Israel already existed at that time.
The inscription itself, which was written in ink on a 15 cm X 16.5 cm trapezoid pottery shard, was discovered a year and a half ago at excavations that were carried out by Prof. Yosef Garfinkel at Khirbet Qeiyafa near the Elah valley. The inscription was dated back to the 10th century BCE, which was the period of King David's reign, but the question of the language used in this inscription remained unanswered, making it impossible to prove whether it was in fact Hebrew or another local language.
Prof. Galil's deciphering of the ancient writing testifies to its being Hebrew, based on the use of verbs particular to the Hebrew language, and content specific to Hebrew culture and not adopted by any other cultures in the region. "This text is a social statement, relating to slaves, widows and orphans. It uses verbs that were characteristic of Hebrew, such as asah ("did") and avad ("worked"), which were rarely used in other regional languages. Particular words that appear in the text, such as almanah ("widow") are specific to Hebrew and are written differently in other local languages. The content itself was also unfamiliar to all the cultures in the region besides the Hebrew society: The present inscription provides social elements similar to those found in the biblical prophecies and very different from prophecies written by other cultures postulating glorification of the gods and taking care of their physical needs," Prof. Galil explains.
He adds that once this deciphering is received, the inscription will become the earliest Hebrew inscription to be found, testifying to Hebrew writing abilities as early as the 10th century BCE. This stands opposed to the dating of the composition of the Bible in current research, which would not have recognized the possibility that the Bible or parts of it could have been written during this ancient period.
Prof. Galil also notes that the inscription was discovered in a provincial town in Judea. He explains that if there were scribes in the periphery, it can be assumed that those inhabiting the central region and Jerusalem were even more proficient writers. "It can now be maintained that it was highly reasonable that during the 10th century BCE, during the reign of King David, there were scribes in Israel who were able to write literary texts and complex historiographies such as the books of Judges and Samuel." He adds that the complexity of the text discovered in Khirbet Qeiyafa, along with the impressive fortifications revealed at the site, refute the claims denying the existence of the Kingdom of Israel at that time.
The contents of the text express social sensitivity to the fragile position of weaker members of society. The inscription testifies to the presence of strangers within the Israeli society as far back as this ancient period, and calls to provide support for these strangers. It appeals to care for the widows and orphans and that the king - who at that time had the responsibility of curbing social inequality - be involved. This inscription is similar in its content to biblical scriptures (Isaiah 1:17, Psalms 72:3, Exodus 23:3, and others), but it is clear that it is not copied from any biblical text.
Explore further:
Google to open R&D center in Israel
More information: English translaton of the deciphered text:
1' you shall not do [it], but worship the [Lord].
2' Judge the sla[ve] and the wid[ow] / Judge the orph[an]
3' [and] the stranger. [Pl]ead for the infant / plead for the po[or and]
4' the widow. Rehabilitate [the poor] at the hands of the king.
5' Protect the po[or and] the slave / [supp]ort the stranger.

frajo
2 / 5 (4) Jan 08, 2010powercosmic
2.1 / 5 (7) Jan 08, 2010If such grand speculation were made in all areas of science on such flimsy "evidence" we would still be buying astrological claims.
Use of the word "king" does not mean that a kingdom existed, that "king" might have been a demented sheepherder, and worse still the translation is not known to be correct.
Lastly, even if the translation were 100% correct the writing could be the scribblings of a nobody.
The fact remains that there is NO CREDIBLE EVIDENCE for the existence of the Kingdom of David or that of his son Solomon. Such a vast kingdom would have left vast tracts of archaeological evidence, just as those found in Egypt which are much much older.
Biblical Archaeology has shown us that the old testament is but a collection of bronze age fairy tales of an enslaved people.
maellis
2.3 / 5 (3) Jan 09, 2010JamesT
1 / 5 (2) Jan 10, 2010mandersen
5 / 5 (3) Jan 10, 2010On the other hand, I don't have a hard time believing there were people who called themselves Israelites, had a King, wrote some stuff down. It doesn't mean everything they wrote down is automatically accurate and true. So what's supernatural about it?
Was the author a nobody? If any demented sheepherder could read and write at the time, wouldn't there be even MORE texts kicking around?
Really, I can't see why this is so contentious. There's a pottery shard, it's old, it has writing on it. There were people back then, had a culture, were writing. It has nothing to do with what you think about modern Israel, or whatever it is that's getting everyone so freaked out about it. Sheesh.
otto1923
not rated yet Jan 10, 2010http://en.wikiped...omo_Sand
http://www.youtub...vANgw9Mk
-Maybe god sneezed and it all disappeared-
JamesT
1 / 5 (1) Jan 10, 2010nevermark
3 / 5 (2) Jan 10, 2010Whether or not the Bible is a credible holy book, this new evidence is historically interesting and seems to shed light on a colorful part of human history. Hooray for science!
otto1923
5 / 5 (1) Jan 12, 2010otto1923
5 / 5 (1) Jan 12, 2010Where are they? One shard with a few words about a mythic king and godders get all excited again. One lintel with the word David on the back. One faked ossuary with James the ossuary maker carved into it. No city, no kingdom, no jehovah the phoney patron saint of a much more recent city state.
JamesT
1 / 5 (1) Jan 12, 2010frajo
3 / 5 (2) Jan 13, 2010Doesn't that indicate that they are in search of something to help them trust their beliefs?
otto1923
5 / 5 (1) Jan 13, 2010If you didnt want a bitter response why'd you dump that god stuff on a science website?
JamesT
1 / 5 (1) Jan 13, 2010otto1923
not rated yet Jan 13, 2010sandeepb
not rated yet Jan 14, 2010some people believe there is no god and some belive there is god. Actually what is god?
For what reason these two groups are fighting?
Both are talking of believes and the word "believe" is an abstract term(can be interpreted in more than one way) then why are these people (not the one i quoted) involving science(which works with concrete things) into believes?
I think we getting off the track by this debate.
mayan
1 / 5 (3) Jan 14, 2010Their power is increased 1000's of times in a German lab, these can stop any air vehicle by gravity beams etc.
some text too will be there in 1970's books on "Rare Earth Metal Applications"
Some proof on utube
http://www.youtub...=related
http://www.youtub...=related
otto1923
5 / 5 (1) Jan 14, 2010Religions hate anything which might caus apostasy; and as most are based on old, easily-disproved myths and pseudoscience, they resist any inquiry into history or the true nature of things.
As I say the true danger- the true evil of religion- is not in faith but in works. Religion will stifle thought, derail science, end progress if given the chance. It will leave to god the things which humanity needs to do for itself. It will continue to cause conflict and misery
lamashtoo
1 / 5 (1) Jan 14, 2010otto1923
not rated yet Jan 15, 2010frajo
1 / 5 (1) Jan 15, 2010otto1923
not rated yet Jan 15, 2010kingpins9
not rated yet Jan 17, 2010boxfiddler
not rated yet Jan 17, 2010Someone found it. Someone translated it. How is it it's not real?
boxfiddler
not rated yet Jan 17, 2010The bickering, and downright hatred isn't between Science and Religion, it's between men using one or the other to promote their own will.
otto1923
not rated yet Jan 19, 2010otto1923
not rated yet Jan 19, 2010Just out of curiosity, if I were to present these same phrases or similar to you in texts from an earlier religion, would you take that as scientific proof that your religious tomes were written by plagiarists? I would start with the enuma elish which is where much of the fiction in the Torah came from-
kingpins9
not rated yet Jan 20, 2010otto1923
5 / 5 (1) Jan 20, 2010"The Enûma Eliš exists in various copies from Babylonia and Assyria. The version from Ashurbanipal's library dates to the 7th century BC. The composition of the text probably dates to the Bronze Age, to the time of Hammurabi or perhaps the early Kassite era (roughly 18th to 16th centuries BC), although some scholars favour a later date of ca. 1100 BC" -The earlier date is more reliable for obvious reasons (that is, most of the bible is redacted and adulterated myth, legend, political expediency and grandstanding).
-You might protest that I left out the 'citation needed' wiki notes in the quotes, although these facts are well accepted among scholars; but if the bible was edited as wiki is, it would be chock full of 'citation needed' notes.
As sumerian/babylonian culture predated most others, and certainly anything in the Levant, the stories in their documents predated the copies in the bible. Abram came from Ur, nicht wahr?
kingpins9
not rated yet Jan 20, 2010Unfortunately, many do not 'truly' have an open mind to the discovery of hard, contradictory information that goes against what they have learned. This is true not only in society in general, but also, can be found in the scientific community to a lesser extent. I.E., Climategate and more recently, 'apparent' Himalayan glacier shrinkage
kingpins9
not rated yet Jan 20, 2010otto1923
not rated yet Jan 20, 2010otto1923
5 / 5 (1) Jan 20, 2010kingpins9
not rated yet Jan 20, 2010To get back on topic, Kitchens had this to say about maintaining the apparent "older" date of the Enuma Elish, "In characteristic fashion, religious modernists allege that the biblical writer/writers borrowed from the Babylonian record. But sound scholarship has demonstrated that such a view is fallacious. Simpler accounts (e.g., the Genesis record) may give rise to more embellished versions, but the reverse is not the case."
Time reveals all things Mr. Otto.
otto1923
not rated yet Jan 20, 2010otto1923
not rated yet Jan 20, 2010"The controversy over whether ancient inscriptions confirm the existence of the Biblical King David usually focuses less on the Mesha stele and more on the Tel Dan stele." -wiki
The house of David reference in these 2 artifacts- doesn't it seem to you that they are earlier invocations of the same myths that the Israelis wrote into their constitution? The Moabites oppressors refer to themselves as decendents of David and so do those oppressed... A nickname. The fictional David and his patron god give the Hebrews the right to oppress their neighbors.
otto1923
not rated yet Jan 20, 2010kingpins9
not rated yet Jan 20, 2010His quote above is essentially common sense. Embellishments happen in routine day-to-day gossip. Remember, the Babylonians were notorious for human sacrifice and other wicked practices. They were also known for incorporating other beliefs as their own.
Keep in mind, there are even people today that would deny there was ever a Temple with artifacts in Jerusalem, even though there is secular proof (Arch or Titus) outside of the OT.
I think you are confusing the Moabite Stone as a Jewish artifact. It is not. The Moabites were not Jews.
kingpins9
not rated yet Jan 20, 2010Evangelical is a word that describes someone that believes in the Great Commission, as mentioned by Christ. There is nothing negative with that description.
I have no desire to debate you Mr. Otto. I have had literally dozens and dozens of similar conversations in the past. I only have the desire to consider facts, and the facts show--based on more and more excavations--that the historicity of the Bible is true.
I hope you read sources of information from all angles.
otto1923
5 / 5 (1) Jan 20, 2010otto1923
not rated yet Jan 20, 2010otto1923
not rated yet Jan 21, 2010kingpins9
not rated yet Jan 21, 2010What legend are you referring to? Christ said that the temple would be torn down and not a stone left unturned. Of course it was Roman soldiers! The Bible does not say it would not be Roman soldiers !
Your "legend" comment has no merit.
Let's try to keep this civil please.
kingpins9
not rated yet Jan 21, 2010A few apostate Israelites did sacrifice when they absorbed some of the pagan rituals. God was against them and this practice and the Jews were judged for these acts (they did not have a nation for over 2000 years). Sin is sin.
frajo
1 / 5 (1) Jan 21, 2010Deconstructing the walls of Jericho:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ze'ev_Herzog
kingpins9
not rated yet Jan 21, 2010Opinion. Like I said earlier, people will curse and swear and believe this drivel, yet ignore proof through the dozens of excavations. Just as we have no empirical evidence of observed evolution (and I'm not talking about adaptation or microevolution).
It's funny that agnostics/atheists generate so much hatred and vitriol toward Christians. One thing is certain, truth will be revealed to all upon death. It's just sad that it will be too late that point to repent. Something to consider.
Kirk out.
frajo
3 / 5 (2) Jan 21, 2010Ze’ev Herzog (born 1941) is an Israeli archeologist, professor of archaeology at The Department of Archaeology and Ancient Near Eastern Cultures at Tel Aviv University. Ze’ev Herzog is the director of The Sonia and Marco Nadler Institute of Archaeology since 2005.
His claim is:
frajo
3 / 5 (2) Jan 21, 2010Yes, some non-believers generate much hatred and vitriol. Does this imply that all non-believers behave this way?
So do some believers, but not all.
And now let's continue with arguments.
otto1923
not rated yet Jan 21, 2010-smug religionists with that smile on their faces, belies more hatred and the potential to violence (we threaten your very soul!) Get thee behind me you vipers! All religions must fall, yours is nothing special, just another one on the pile.
otto1923
not rated yet Jan 21, 2010http://www.youtub...be_gdata
-He proofs are as unequivocal as those of your prof Kitchen (more so), in this case that Jewish history is largely fabrication. Shlomo Sand
otto1923
not rated yet Jan 21, 2010