Fossil shelved for a century reworks carnivore family tree

December 22, 2009
An early carnivore that was a close relative of Miacis uintensis, Vulpavus, is about to climb on a tree trunk. This illustrates the varied locomotor adaptations seen across even the earliest relatives of living carnivorans. Credit: Marlene Donnelly and The Field Museum

More than a hundred years after its discovery, the limbs and vertebrae of a fossil have been pulled off the shelf at the American Museum of Natural History to revise the view of early carnivore lifestyles. Carnivores—currently a diverse group of mostly meat-eating mammals like bears, cats, raccoons, seals, and hyenas—had been considered arboreal in their early evolutionary history. But now that the skeleton of 'Miacis' uintensis has been unpacked from its matrix of sandstone, it is clear that some early carnivores were built to walk on the ground at least part of the time. The new research is published this month in the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology.

"Carnivores are highly varied today, and they were also very diverse in the past," says lead author Michelle Spaulding, a doctoral candidate at Columbia University and the Museum. "Examination of this tells us that they were not all sitting in trees, looking down. 'M.' uintensis did not have a lot of adaptations for an arboreal lifestyle."

"It is typically thought that the miacoids of the Eocene—the basal fossil relatives of modern Carnivora that root the family tree—were arboreal," concurs co-author John Flynn, Frick Curator of Fossil at the Museum. "But we now are beginning to see that there was a greater diversity of locomotor styles in early carnivores."

'M.' uintensis was discovered on an American Museum of Natural History expedition in 1894 among the brown and red sandstones of the White River beds in Utah. Henry Fairfield Osborn, who first named the iconic dinosaurs and Velociraptor mongoliensis, described the teeth of the newly discovered mammal carnivore species in a Museum monograph the following year. The specimen dates to 39-42 million years ago.

But the species is more than teeth and a jaw. Another specimen found in 1896 is more complete, represented by much of the skull, shoulder bones, limb bones, and even some tiny foot and finger bones. This specimen remained on a shelf in the Museum, largely ignored, because its teeth were badly crushed.

"When I examined the femur, I immediately knew this was a terrestrial animal because of the shape of its knee. It has a long and deep groove where the patella, or kneecap, would go," says Spaulding. If the early carnivore had been exclusively arboreal, the end of the femur would have had a flatter surface so that the joint would have a greater range of motion. Spaulding and Flynn found other indicators of terrestrial locomotion on bones like the radius, one of the two lower arm bones. The distal part of the radius, or the portion of the bone that would be in contact with the wrist, of 'M.' uintensis has an oval shape with a projection above the rim. These features also reduce the range of motion, making limbs more stable for walking on the ground. Other features, however, indicate that 'M.' uintensis had some adaptations for climbing, so this early carnivore was most likely flexible in locomotion style, active mostly on the ground but also capable of climbing bushes and trees.

This analysis is the fifth time that early carnivore postcrania have been carefully described in detail. Adding the information from this long-neglected fossil to the previously known data, though, does point researchers into new directions. An analysis of 99 traits among 29 fossils and 15 living taxa resulted in a new evolutionary tree that shows that 'M.' uintensis is distantly related to the type specimens from the Miacis genus, suggesting that an extensive revision of the current understanding of the evolutionary relationships among early carnivore fossils may be needed. But more significantly, the structure of the evolutionary tree suggests that adaptations to terrestrial or semi-terrestrial locomotion were more common than previously suspected in early fossil carnivores, preceding the split between the two major groups of living Carnivora, the Caniformia (a group that includes dogs, weasels, bears, seals and their relatives) and Feliformia (cats, hyenas, mongooses and civets).

"The fossil that we re-describe was thought to be in poor condition and had been ignored," says Flynn. "But now we are beginning to gain a better understanding of the ancestral conditions near the base of the carnivore tree. A lot of skeletons have been found over the years, and we think that intensively studying additional fossils will help build a more comprehensive view of the habitat-specializations of the early relatives of the living Carnivora."

Explore further: Primitive early relative of armadillos helps rewrite evolutionary family tree

Related Stories

New fossil tells how piranhas got their teeth

June 25, 2009

How did piranhas -- the legendary freshwater fish with the razor bite -- get their telltale teeth? Researchers from Argentina, the United States and Venezuela have uncovered the jawbone of a striking transitional fossil that ...

Getting a leg up on whale and dolphin evolution

September 24, 2009

When the ancestors of living cetaceans—whales, dolphins and porpoises—first dipped their toes into water, a series of evolutionary changes were sparked that ultimately nestled these swimming mammals into the larger hoofed ...

Bizarre new horned tyrannosaur from Asia described

October 5, 2009

Now, just a few weeks after tiny, early Raptorex kriegsteini was unveiled, a new wrench has been thrown into the family tree of the tyrannosaurs. The new Alioramus altai—a horned, long-snouted, gracile cousin of Tyrannosaurus ...

Recommended for you


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (7) Dec 22, 2009
Scientists like to tell us we know it all but this proves them wrong...again. The only explanation for lifes complexity is Intelligent Design, who stuck the wings on Arkyopterix then?
Dec 22, 2009
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
2 / 5 (1) Dec 22, 2009
Sometimes, I just can't tell with that guy. At any rate, it's "Archaeopteryx"...
1 / 5 (6) Dec 23, 2009
Tell me how wings evolved? How did eyes evolve and how did the transition from sea to freshwater happen. These can't be explained by science, as we know scientists can't be trusted and are in one scam or another aren't they? East Anglia emails PROVE global warming's a hoax, in the same way Piltdown man was a hoax so evolution must be a scam!
Dec 23, 2009
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Dec 23, 2009
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Dec 23, 2009
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Dec 23, 2009
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
not rated yet Dec 24, 2009
That guy isn't the actual poster. notice the difference in the name spelling and capitalization.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.