Bill would counter Supreme Court age bias ruling

October 6, 2009 By SAM HANANEL , Associated Press Writer

(AP) -- Democrats in Congress are trying to counter another Supreme Court decision on employment discrimination, this time taking aim at a ruling that makes it harder for older workers to prove age bias.

A measure introduced Tuesday would effectively reverse a 5-4 decision from earlier this year that said workers must show age was the decisive factor in a demotion or layoff.

Previously, older workers had to show that age was just one factor in the employment decision. Critics of the ruling by the court's conservative majority say it means older workers now face a higher burden of proving their claim than those alleging race, sex, national origin or religious discrimination.

"This extremely high burden radically undermines older workers' ability to hold employers accountable," said Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin, chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee.

Harkin introduced the bill at a news conference joined by Jack Gross, the losing plaintiff in the Supreme Court case. Harkin said the timing of the court's decision in Gross v. FBL Financial is even more troubling considering unemployment figures for workers 55 and older are at an all-time high.

Judiciary Committee chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., said the court's decision is already having a "ripple effect" in lower courts interpreting other anti-discrimination laws.

In response to another high court ruling earlier this year, Congress passed a bill that gives workers more time to take their pay discrimination cases to court. The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act - the first measure that President Barack Obama signed into law - countered a 2007 Supreme Court decision that said workers had only 180 days to file pay-discrimination lawsuits.

"The same responsible for the backward ruling against Lilly Ledbetter has now thrown another legal barrier in front of hardworking older Americans," said California Rep. George Miller, chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee.

The age discrimination measure also has the strong backing of the AARP.

"We're also talking about fairness, plain and simple," said AARP executive vice president Nancy LeaMond. "We should be making it harder for employers to discriminate against workers, not easier."

©2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Explore further: U.S. court rules against medical marijuana

Related Stories

U.S. court rules against medical marijuana

March 14, 2007

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Wednesday that an individual's right to medical marijuana does not supersede the Controlled Substances Act.

Court Denies Vonage Bid for Patent Case Retrial

May 4, 2007

A U.S. appeals court denies a request by Internet phone company Vonage Holdings that it order a retrial in the patent infringement case brought against it by Verizon Communications.

Recommended for you

Amateur paleontologist finds rare fossil of fish in Arizona

September 3, 2015

Growing up, Stephanie Leco often would dig in her backyard and imagine finding fossils of a tyrannosaurus rex. She was fascinated with the idea of holding something in her hand that was millions of years old and would give ...

Early human diet explains our eating habits

August 31, 2015

Much attention is being given to what people ate in the distant past as a guide to what we should eat today. Advocates of the claimed palaeodiet recommend that we should avoid carbohydrates and load our plates with red meat ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.