Perfect image without metamaterials... and a reprieve for silicon chips (w/ Video)

September 29, 2009
Perfect image without metamaterials... and a reprieve for silicon chips (w/ Video)

( -- Since 2000, John Pendry's work on metamaterials has been at the van guard of efforts to create a perfect image - images with perfect resolution that can stem from light being moved in odd directions to create, among other tricks of the light, the illusion of invisibility.

One exciting development was Pendry's theoretically perfect work on negative refraction, which offered the possibility of lenses that could create images with not possible with conventional lenses. But this proved problematic in practice as the negatively refracting materials so far produced did not live up to their potential - absorbing a certain amount of the and spoiling the resolution of the perfect image.

In a new research paper published today, Tuesday, 29 September, in called 'Perfect imaging without negative refraction', Ulf Leonhardt, Chair of Theoretical Physics at the University of St. Andrew's, has shown that there is another way to create the perfect image.

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.

Inspired by James Clerk Maxwell's findings, first expounded in the 1850s, Leonhardt is reintroducing the idea of a 'fish-eye' lens; a lens that can work in any direction but had not, until now, been modeled to fully account for the wave-like properties of light.

Professor Leonhardt said, "It is the waviness of light that limits the resolution of lenses. Apparently, nobody had tried to calculate the imaging of light waves in Maxwell's fish-eye. The new research proves that the fish-eye has unlimited resolution in principle, and, as it does not need negative refraction, it may also work in practice.

"The theory was inspired by ideas for invisibility where light is bent around objects to make them disappear from view. Here the ideas behind invisibility are applied for perfect imaging."

While the work is only theoretical at present, it will be exciting news to silicon chip manufacturers as the resolution limit of lenses limits the microchip technology needed for making ever faster computers.

While this development will not overcome the problems posed by the physical limits of smaller and smaller chip circuitry, it will give chipmakers freedom to photograph ever smaller, and more compact, structures of billions of tiny transistors on silicon chips to meet the insatiable appetite for faster and smaller computers.

More information: Journal paper:

Source: Institute of Physics (news : web)

Explore further: Security Alert: Beware of SMS Messages That Can Take Control of Your Phone

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Exploring the physics of a chocolate fountain

November 24, 2015

A mathematics student has worked out the secrets of how chocolate behaves in a chocolate fountain, answering the age-old question of why the falling 'curtain' of chocolate surprisingly pulls inwards rather than going straight ...

Biomedical imaging at one-thousandth the cost

November 23, 2015

MIT researchers have developed a biomedical imaging system that could ultimately replace a $100,000 piece of a lab equipment with components that cost just hundreds of dollars.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

3.8 / 5 (4) Sep 29, 2009's fish-eye&f=false

The maxwell fish eye is itself a theoretical construct, ridiculous to find a professor take it so seriously.
2.3 / 5 (4) Sep 29, 2009
with nano waveguides, it could become a practical construct as well
4 / 5 (3) Sep 29, 2009
therein lies the rub, with a waveguide, the wavelength enters the picture.
5 / 5 (4) Sep 29, 2009
equation (26) of the paper (I think it is publicly accessible) shows the image of an extended object becomes quite distorted (x,y)->(-x/(x^2+y^2),-y/(x^2+y^2)). In lithography, we need depth of focus. This doesn't have it.
2.3 / 5 (3) Sep 29, 2009
If the distortion is predictable it may not be a problem. Design the original with the proper pre-distortion, and the imaging distortion will give the desired result.

Obviously this won't work for general photography, where you don't have control of the original object, but it should for chip making.
4 / 5 (3) Sep 29, 2009
If you are using this fish eye lens as the final imaging lens, it won't work for lithography for chip making. x-> -1/x is not imaging. You cannot embed a fish eye inside another, it destroys the point-to-point mapping setup. If you are not using this as the final lens, then you are not improving the resolution.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.