Don't stand by me: Study explores role of personal connections in failing projects (w/ Podcast)

September 30, 2009 By Megan Washburn

( -- When business leaders leave organizations following poor decisions, constituents often find comfort in replacing them with insiders — others familiar with the problem and original choices.

But new research by faculty members at Northwestern University's Kellogg School of Management suggests that such decisions are best left to a completely unrelated, outside party, contrary to the natural inclination to go to an insider — someone with personal connections to the old boss.

“Vicarious entrapment: Your sunk costs, my escalation of commitment” will appear in an upcoming issue of the . The study is co-authored by Adam Galinsky, the Morris and Alice Kaplan Professor of Ethics and Decision in Management, Brian Gunia, a lecturer of Management & Organizations, and Niro Sivanathan of the London Business School.

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.
Listen to Professor Adam Galinsky discuss his research

The researchers found that when new decision makers share a psychological connection with an initial decision maker, they may invest further in the failing programs of the first — even to their own financial detriment.

In this research, the authors explored a phenomenon they coined “vicarious entrapment.” They proposed that the success of a two-decision solution was dependent on not just a physical separation, but a psychological separation of the decision makers. If the delegated decision maker was even subtly connected to the original — by sharing similar attributes like the same birthday or simply empathizing with the first decision maker, for example — he or she honored the original decision maker’s commitments and made further investments in that person’s losing decisions.

“We know humans are social beings driven to find attachments and connections to others. Research has shown that once a psychological connection forms between two individuals, they are more likely to cooperate and favor each other financially,” Galinsky said. “The current research suggests that they are also more likely to escalate on each others’ failing decisions.”

Galinsky and colleagues’ experiments examined psychological connectedness in three contexts: financial investments, personnel decisions and auctions. Even when participants faced a direct financial cost to themselves — and even among economics students trained in the irrationality of honoring sunk costs — the delegated decision maker followed the original decisions once a was made with the original decision maker.

In one experiment on personnel decisions, participants awarded a larger raise to an underperforming candidate originally “hired” by another initial decision-maker, but only when they had taken the perspective of and empathized with the first decision-maker. Likewise, participants who shared the same birthday (i.e., had something in common) with an original auction bidder made many more bids and lost significantly more money than those who took over for a bidder with a different birthday.

“Business, and even political organizations trying to navigate their way out of decisions gone wrong, should carefully consider integrating a true outsider — someone with no connections to prior leadership,” Gunia said. “Although outsiders may take longer to understand the problem, their psychological disconnection with the past may enable them to act more decisively once they do. Our research suggests that an individual who shares even the most subtle connections with predecessors may act less independently.”

Provided by Northwestern University (news : web)

Explore further: Boosting self-esteem can backfire in decision-making

Related Stories

Boosting self-esteem can backfire in decision-making

March 31, 2008

Smart business leaders understand that confidence affects decision-making and ultimately a company’s earnings. But giving employees positive feedback in the hopes of promoting better decisions sometimes can backfire, suggests ...

What was I doing? Interruptions can change purchase decisions

September 15, 2008

You're on your computer, about to buy a vacation package when the phone rings. According to a new study in the Journal of Consumer Research, when you return to the computer after the interruption, you may have a completely ...

Under pressure: The impact of stress on decision making

September 15, 2009

We are faced with making decisions all the time. Often, we carefully deliberate the pros and cons of our choices, taking into consideration past experiences in similar situations before making a final decision. However, a ...

Recommended for you

How much for that Nobel prize in the window?

October 3, 2015

No need to make peace in the Middle East, resolve one of science's great mysteries or pen a masterpiece: the easiest way to get yourself a Nobel prize may be to buy one.

Search for Egypt's Nefertiti gains new momentum (Update)

September 29, 2015

The search for ancient Egypt's Queen Nefertiti in an alleged hidden chamber in King Tut's tomb gained new momentum as Egypt's Antiquities Minister said Tuesday he is now more convinced a queen's tomb may lay hidden behind ...

New finds of a living fossil

October 2, 2015

The coelacanth fish, found today in the Indian Ocean, is often called a 'living fossil' because its last ancestors existed about 70 million years ago and it has survived into the present - but without leaving any fossil remains ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.