Research shows temptation more powerful than individuals realize

August 3, 2009

Whether it's highlighted in major news headlines about Argentinean affairs and Ponzi schemes, or in personal battles with obesity and drug addiction, individuals regularly succumb to greed, lust and self-destructive behaviors. New research from the Kellogg School of Management examines why this is the case, and demonstrates that individuals believe they have more restraint than they actually possess--ultimately leading to poor decision-making.

The study, led by Loran Nordgren, senior lecturer of management and organizations at the Kellogg School, examined how an individual's belief in his/her ability to control impulses such as greed, drug craving and sexual arousal influenced responses to . The research found the sample, on average, displayed a "restraint bias," causing individuals to miscalculate the amount of temptation they could truly handle, in turn leading to a greater likelihood of indulging impulsive or .

"People are not good at anticipating the power of their urges, and those who are the most confident about their self-control are the most likely to give into temptation," said Nordgren. "The key is simply to avoid any situations where vices and other weaknesses thrive and, most importantly, for individuals to keep a humble view of their willpower."

In developing their case, the study's authors cited previous research demonstrating that people often have difficulty appreciating the power of impulsive states. People in a "cold state" (not experiencing hunger, anger, sexual arousal, etc.) tend to underestimate how a "hot," impulsive state will influence their behavior. To expand upon these findings, the study authors set out to test whether:

  • People in a cold, non-impulsive state will overestimate their ability to control impulses
  • People in a hot, impulsive state will have a more realistic view of their capacity for impulse control
  • People who perceive they have a high capacity for impulse control will expose themselves to more temptation and will ultimately exhibit more impulsive behavior
To test their hypotheses, the researchers conducted four experiments focusing on hunger, addiction and mental fatigue. Each experiment resulted in significant "restraint bias."

For example, one experiment focused on cigarette addiction found those who overestimated their capacity for self-control were much more likely to smoke a cigarette after simply watching a movie about smoking. Another experiment centered on hunger. Results found a satiated group was significantly less likely to return snacks than a hungry group who limited their temptation by choosing less appealing snacks.

"A system which assumes people will control themselves is going to fall prey to this restraint bias; we expose ourselves to more temptation than is wise, and subsequently we have millions of people suffering with obesity, addictions and other unhealthy lifestyles," said Nordgren. "And, while our study focused on personal behaviors like smoking and eating, it is easy to apply our findings to a broader context. Understanding the power of temptation, you might also ask about the extent to which we need oversight or regulatory guidelines for business and political leaders."

Furthermore, this research suggests observers should think twice before judging those who fall prey to temptation because most people overestimate their capacity to control their own impulses, Nordgren concluded.

More information: The study will appear in an upcoming issue of Psychological Science.

Source: Association for Psychological Science (news : web)

Explore further: Why it is impossible for some to 'just say no'

Related Stories

Why it is impossible for some to 'just say no'

October 10, 2007

Drug abuse, crime and obesity are but a few of the problems our nation faces, but they all have one thing in common—people’s failure to control their behavior in the face of temptation. While the ability to control and ...

Don't throw the candy out: Temptation leads to moderation

September 15, 2008

Banishing tempting goodies may not be the best way to keep from eating them. Tempting foods can actually increase willpower, according to new research in the Journal of Consumer Research. Although it seems counterintuitive, ...

The paradox of temptation

January 30, 2009

Does the mere availability of something tempting weaken the will to resist? The answer is of more than theoretical interest to public health experts, and the problem goes far beyond serious addictive disorders. Just think ...

Recommended for you

How the finch changes its tune

August 3, 2015

Like top musicians, songbirds train from a young age to weed out errors and trim variability from their songs, ultimately becoming consistent and reliable performers. But as with human musicians, even the best are not machines. ...

Machine Translates Thoughts into Speech in Real Time

December 21, 2009

( -- By implanting an electrode into the brain of a person with locked-in syndrome, scientists have demonstrated how to wirelessly transmit neural signals to a speech synthesizer. The "thought-to-speech" process ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Aug 03, 2009
You only live once.
not rated yet Aug 03, 2009
That's what I think too. But being a subject - you never know what exactly is outside the subject. You can only guess it. This means that all our judgment about the world - is just assumptions, and there is no guaranty, that they are true.
1 / 5 (1) Aug 03, 2009
I suggest that your genes decide what you like or dislike. they also decide whether you get cancer or not. They decide whether you become addicted or not.
My father smoked like a trooper. He died aged 96 of natural causes. My sister died of cancer, aged 59. She never smoked or drank alcohol. It is in your deciding genes.
not rated yet Aug 03, 2009
This article appears to reinforce the Buddhist teaching of avoiding temptation and not letting one's mental state ever become 'hot' as described.
not rated yet Aug 03, 2009
@EvgenijM - guarantee*.

At everyone else... The only way to control it is to be at an extreme of control and polarize to a view. I.e make the rules ahead of time instead of being fuzzy. And make sure pick an exact side given your leanings. You might well be able to pick the right side, but to do with that power is an act on intention and requires you to pay very close attention to things.
not rated yet Aug 04, 2009
I was tempted to comment, but restrained myself.
not rated yet Aug 04, 2009
"you might also ask about the extent to which we need oversight or regulatory guidelines for business and political leaders."

So we should take the temptation away by force?

Those without self control should be allowed to grow fat, unhealthy, and unattractive. Freedom breeds intelligence.
not rated yet Aug 04, 2009
jsh: You missed the point. It's the politicians and business leaders who need stronger regulatory oversight according to the article, and I agree. We are fools to depend on the restraint of politicians to keep our countries out of conflict.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.