Wind estimate 'shortens Saturn's day by five minutes'

July 29, 2009
Saturn's day may be five minutes shorter than previously thought.

( -- A new way of detecting how fast large gaseous planets are rotating suggests Saturn’s day lasts 10 hours, 34 minutes and 13 seconds - over five minutes shorter than previous estimates that were based on the planet’s magnetic fields.

The research, published in this week’s Nature, was carried out by an international team led by scientists from Oxford University and the University of Louisville, USA.

Measuring the rotation of gas giants such as is difficult because the planet has no solid surface to use as a reference. Also, unlike Jupiter, Saturn’s magnetic fields are aligned with its rotation axis so that their fluctuations do not give an accurate measure of the rotation of the planet’s deep interior.

The new approach comes out of work begun over ten years ago by Timothy Dowling of the University of Louisville into measuring the movements of ammonia clouds across Saturn’s surface and the work of Professor Peter Read of Oxford University, who has been using data from the NASA spacecraft’s infrared spectrometer to study the planet’s atmosphere since 2004.

‘We realised that we could combine information on what was visible on the surface of Saturn with Cassini’s infrared data about the planet’s deep interior and build a three dimensional map of Saturn’s winds,’ said Professor Peter Read of Oxford University’s Department of Physics, an author of the paper. ‘With this map we were able to track how large waves and eddies develop in the atmosphere and from this come up with a new estimate for the underlying rotation of the planet.’

Professor Read said: ‘While shortening Saturn’s day by five minutes might not sound like much it implies that some of our previous estimates of speeds may be out by more than 160 miles per hour! It also means that the weather patterns on Saturn are much more like those we observe on Jupiter, suggesting that, despite their differences, these two have more in common than previously thought.’

The new finding could prove crucial in understanding the deep interior of the planet, whose rotation the team believes may be more complicated than a solid body because it is made up of fluid. It could also shed light on how Saturn and other gas giants - such as Jupiter, Uranus and Neptune - evolved.

Provided by Oxford University (news : web)

Explore further: 'Chinese Lantern' Technique Helps Track Clouds at Saturn

Related Stories

'Chinese Lantern' Technique Helps Track Clouds at Saturn

October 5, 2006

A new image of Saturn demonstrates a technique that creates a 'Chinese lantern' effect, showing Saturn's deep clouds silhouetted against the planet’s warm, glowing interior. Seen this way, Saturn's interior shows surprising ...

Recommended for you

Blue skies, frozen water detected on Pluto

October 8, 2015

Pluto has blue skies and patches of frozen water, according to the latest data out Thursday from NASA's unmanned New Horizons probe, which made a historic flyby of the dwarf planet in July.

Orbiter views Mars surface fractures

October 8, 2015

The High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE) camera aboard NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter often takes images of Martian sand dunes to study the mobile soils. These images provide information about erosion and ...

How to prepare for Mars? NASA consults Navy sub force

October 5, 2015

As NASA contemplates a manned voyage to Mars and the effects missions deeper into space could have on astronauts, it's tapping research from another outfit with experience sending people to the deep: the U.S. Navy submarine ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

4.2 / 5 (10) Jul 29, 2009
If find improper word use annoying and misleading. Days didnt "get" shorter. A "day" had not "shortened". THAT WOULD MEAN HUGE DRAMATIC CATACLISMIC rotatation change. AND WOULD HAVE ACTUALLY BEEN A VERY INTERESTING STORY. What happened was that ESTIMATES OF DAYS LENGTHS WERE REVISED. Why the FK cant they simply say it right?! Are writers really that stupid or careless? Or do they mislead on purpose to get attention? Either way, its stinks. Stop it.
3.2 / 5 (5) Jul 29, 2009
do they mislead on purpose to get attention?

5 / 5 (2) Jul 30, 2009
(c) 2009 AFP

Press: Newspapers: Headlines ... Reader Capture

PhysOrg only relays these items 'as is' because that is the 'standard agreement' with such news feeds.
Jul 30, 2009
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.