Researchers find differences in how adolescent girls’ and boys’ brains react to peer interaction

Jul 23, 2009

( -- A team of researchers with the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), including a Georgia State University scientist, have found differences between girls and boys in how parts of the brain develop in responding to peer judgments — with girls becoming more preoccupied with how peers view them, while boys become more focused on their place in groups.

Erin McClure-Tone, assistant professor of psychology at Georgia State, was part of a team of researchers at NIMH who studied the brain activity of healthy adolescent and boys aged 9 to 17 using a () scanner.

“The bottom line seems to be that as adolescents, particularly girls, mature, both the ways in which they approach new relationships and the patterns of brain activity associated with thinking about these relationships gradually change,” McClure-Tone said.

The were shown 40 photographs of other teens and were asked to rate on a scale of 0 to 100 how much they’d like to interact with each person depicted. They were also told that each teen in the picture would see their picture and rate how much they would like to interact with the study participant, and that they would be matched to chat online with a mutually interested peer.

The study subjects were scanned two weeks later using the fMRI, during which they viewed all 40 photos again, but were asked how much they thought each depicted person would want to interact with them.

Data were then collected about which areas of the brain were activated while the study participants thought about being judged by high-desirable versus low-desirable peers.

Older females in the study showed more than younger females in the parts of the brain that process social emotion, such as the amygdala, while males showed little change in most of those areas.

“Many of the regions in which we saw distinct activation patterns project to each other, which suggests that they are all part of a loose network that implements aspects of social thought and behavior,” McClure-Tone said.

The data suggest that the different patterns of reaction might contribute to a marked increase in the rates of depression in adolescent girls, which does not happen with , she said.

The study, “Probing the Neural Correlates of Anticipated Evaluation in Adolescence,” appears in the July 2009 issue of Child Development.

Provided by Georgia State University (news : web)

Explore further: Talk is cheap: New study finds words speak louder than actions

Related Stories

Brain emotion circuit sparks as teen girls size up peers

Jul 15, 2009

What is going on in teenagers' brains as their drive for peer approval begins to eclipse their family affiliations? Brain scans of teens sizing each other up reveal an emotion circuit activating more in girls ...

Sex, drugs and dating make teens feel older

Jun 18, 2007

A Canadian study has confirmed what parents have long suspected: dating, sexual activity and substance use seem to make teens feel older than they really are. And, as adolescents get older, the gap between their chronological ...

“Feeling Fat” Is Worse Than Being It

Jun 20, 2008

In the course of the KiGGS study, almost 7000 boys and girls aged between 11 and 17 years were weighed and asked about their self-assessment, ranging from “far too thin” to “far too fat.” In addition, they all completed ...

Move over mean girls -- boys can be socially aggressive, too

Sep 16, 2008

Society holds that when it comes to aggression, boys hit and punch, while girls spread rumors, gossip, and intentionally exclude others, a type of aggression that's called indirect, relational, or social. Now a new analysis ...

Recommended for you

Genes add risk to depression

11 hours ago

People born with a particular gene variant have a greater risk of developing depressions, a recent study from the Department of Psychology at The University of Oslo shows.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Jul 24, 2009
this cant be... you mean men and women are fundementally different and that marx was completely wrong and that we have much empirical proof of this as we drive off a cliff?
nahh.. go back to sleep.... :)

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.