No crystal ball necessary: New tool IDs predictable economic variables

July 21, 2009

You don't need a crystal ball to tell you what is going to happen next in the economy. You need a statistical model. A new method from North Carolina State University can help researchers determine which economic variables they should focus on by identifying whether a variable can be predicted.

The new method could be a breakthrough for economists and statisticians, says Dr. Mehmet Caner, an associate professor of economics at NC State and co-author of the paper unveiling the new research. "This could lead to much great insight into the national and global economy by providing the impetus to develop new forecasting models for those variables that can be predicted," he says.

Currently, economists and statisticians use tools called "unit root tests" to determine whether an economic variable - such as unemployment - can be predicted. "The issue," Caner says, "is that unit root tests often say variables are unpredictable when they actually can be predicted.

"I think our method will show that many variables believed to be unpredictable are actually predictable," Caner says, "including currency exchange rates and gross domestic product."

Caner worked with Dr. Keith Knight, of the University of Toronto, to develop an entirely new method using new models to better differentiate between predictable and unpredictable economic variables.

The idea stemmed in part from the use of Bridge estimator models in medical research to identify sections of genetic code that may be related to disease. Caner and Knight saw that similar techniques could be used to determine which economic variables within an economic system might be predictable.

Caner will present the new research, "No Country for Old Unit Root Tests: Bridge Estimators Differentiate between Nonstationary versus Stationary Models and Select Optimal Lag," at the European Economic Association and Econometric Society European meeting being held in Barcelona, Spain, from Aug. 23-27.

Source: North Carolina State University (news : web)

Explore further: How Will the Economy Fare in 2007?

Related Stories

How Will the Economy Fare in 2007?

January 17, 2007

North Carolina State professor Dr. Michael Walden is an economist and not an airplane pilot, but he uses aviation terminology to discuss the prospects for the U.S. economy in the next 12 months.

Why conservation efforts often fail

September 18, 2007

Modern conservation techniques have brought us the resurgence of American bald eagles, sustainable forest harvests and the rescue of prized lobster fisheries. So how can modern conservation strategies also have wrought such ...

New model predicts hot spots for mercury in fish

December 1, 2008

Mercury levels in fish are prompting widespread consumption advisories and uncertainty among consumers over which species are safe to eat. Now researchers at North Carolina State University have developed a model that will ...

Recommended for you

How much for that Nobel prize in the window?

October 3, 2015

No need to make peace in the Middle East, resolve one of science's great mysteries or pen a masterpiece: the easiest way to get yourself a Nobel prize may be to buy one.

Search for Egypt's Nefertiti gains new momentum (Update)

September 29, 2015

The search for ancient Egypt's Queen Nefertiti in an alleged hidden chamber in King Tut's tomb gained new momentum as Egypt's Antiquities Minister said Tuesday he is now more convinced a queen's tomb may lay hidden behind ...

New finds of a living fossil

October 2, 2015

The coelacanth fish, found today in the Indian Ocean, is often called a 'living fossil' because its last ancestors existed about 70 million years ago and it has survived into the present - but without leaving any fossil remains ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Jul 21, 2009
Well, at least they should have plenty of data to test their theories on. It should be interesting if they can model the current economic crisis. Maybe once and for all the Democrat vs Repub philosophies can be tested.
5 / 5 (1) Jul 21, 2009
Well, at least they should have plenty of data to test their theories on. It should be interesting if they can model the current economic crisis. Maybe once and for all the Democrat vs Repub philosophies can be tested.

Neither philosophy is correct in its entirety, but there are some things we all know to be false.

For example, the GOP is wrong when they've said, "War is good for the economy." Conversely, the DNP is wrong when they say you "Have to spend your way out of debt".

There's only one right answer, vote em all out of office unless they do something that is entirely for the people, and not just for the people who fund their campaign.
5 / 5 (1) Jul 21, 2009
The primary problem is they support their party over their nation they aren't looking to make the situatin better they just aim to help out their campaign contributors

I pledge allegiance to the party and to the chicanery for which it stands, one nation under our thumb with prosperity and justice for none
not rated yet Jul 21, 2009
Economics is one of those things, like AI or climate and/or weather, I don't think we're going to be able to accurately and reliably model them until we have quantum computers. There's too many variables within variables within variables.

It's always bothered me when people refer to economics as a science anyway. There's general ideas and reasonable principles but I don't think there's any immutable laws, like physics. It's still just a freaking giant ongoing experiment, much like the various civilizations.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.