IBM cuts Sun takeover price: WSJ

April 2, 2009
A sign is posted outside of the Sun Microsystems headquarters in Santa Clara, California. IBM has cut the price of its takeover bid for Sun Microsystems Inc. to nine to 10 dollars a share from 10 to 11 dollars a share, The Wall Street Journal online reported on Thursday.

IBM has cut the price of its takeover bid for Sun Microsystems Inc. to nine to 10 dollars a share from 10 to 11 dollars a share, The Wall Street Journal online reported on Thursday.

The newspaper, citing "people familiar with the matter," said Sun had agreed to accept a lower price "in return for stronger commitments from that it will complete the deal even if it faces intense regulatory scrutiny."

The Journal said Sun was concerned that government antitrust regulators could impose conditions and hold up an agreement for months and it "remains unclear when the two sides will reach a deal."

According to the newspaper, the combined companies would account for 42 percent of total server market revenue and 65 percent of the market for servers based on the Unix operating system.

Sun has a current market value of about six billion dollars and the IBM offer places a value on the computer server company of between 6.7 billion dollars and 7.4 billion dollars.

Several analysts have questioned the benefits for IBM of the purchase of Sun, which owns the rights to the Java programming language and MySQL open source database software, but has been running up big losses recently.

A purchase of Sun would be the largest in the history of IBM and in line with "Big Blue" chairman Samuel Palmisano's recent pledge not to sit back but to engage in "strategic acquisitions."

IBM is one of the few major corporations to have weathered the global economic showdown and ended 2008 with 12.9 billion dollars in cash and marketable securities on hand.

IBM is the largest server manufacturer, followed by Hewlett-Packard, Dell and Sun.

The first reports of an IBM acquisition of Sun came just days after networking giant Inc. announced it too would begin building servers as part of a next-generation data center platform for corporations.

IBM and Sun have declined to comment on the takeover reports.

Sun closed at 8.21 dollars in New York on Thursday, a gain of 2.63 percent, while IBM closed 3.29 percent higher at 100.82 dollars.

(c) 2009 AFP

Explore further: IBM's China-win claim irks HP

Related Stories

IBM's China-win claim irks HP

November 17, 2005

For IBM, winning its single-biggest contract in China is something to be immensely proud of, and they are understandably eager to publicize it widely, but rival Hewlett Packard is disputing Big Blue's claim that it seized ...

Satyam gets 'adequate bid response'

March 14, 2009

The board of swindled Indian outsourcing giant Satyam said it has received an "adequate response" to its invitation for bids, as a newspaper said Saturday that IBM had joined the race.

IBM could shake up Silicon Valley with Sun deal (Update 2)

March 18, 2009

(AP) -- If IBM Corp. scoops up Sun Microsystems Inc. for at least $6.5 billion in cash, as the companies are discussing, IBM would be making an opportunistic grab for a deep well of technology that Sun has nearly buried ...

IBM to shift 'large number' of US jobs to India

March 25, 2009

Computer giant IBM plans to cut a "large number" of US employees in its business services unit and transfer their duties to India, the Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday.

Recommended for you

Sydney makes its mark with electronic paper traffic signs

July 28, 2015

Visionect, which is in the business of helping companies build electronic paper display products, announced that Sydney has launched e-paper traffic signs. The traffic signage integrates displays from US manufacturer E Ink ...

3 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Disrupted
not rated yet Apr 02, 2009
Bah. Sorry to be so nonchalant with this comment, but... who really cares?

Even for the experienced I.T. person like me, it doesn't even matter anymore which industry giant makes or loses money or who buys and sells who. For me, as long as I have decent job, I'm good.
frajo
1 / 5 (1) Apr 03, 2009
Bah. Sorry to be so nonchalant with this comment, but... who really cares?

I do. I welcome any measure which enables IBM to show a certain greedy company its limits.
Disrupted
not rated yet Apr 04, 2009
Granted. I can understand your point of view. I guess I'm just not that interested anymore, in seeing companies throwing around billions where I have trouble making my full RRSP contribution some years.

In the end, quite a few of these acquisitions don't really effect most of us.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.