Dinosaurs declined before mass extinction

April 30, 2009
A dinosaur scene from the Cretaceous. Museum scientists reveal that dinosaur diversity was decreasing millions of years before the mass extinction 65 million years ago. Image: Natural History Museum

Dinosaurs were dying out much earlier than the mass extinction event 65 million years ago, Natural History Museum scientists report in the Proceedings of the Royal Society journal today.

The diversity of dinosaur species was already on the decline millions of years before this event. This changes the current theory about how and when became extinct.

'It appears that dinosaurs were declining well before the famous meteor impact,' says Paul Barrett, part of the research team and dinosaur expert at the Natural History Museum.

'The impact may have been the coup de grace that helped to finish off a group that was already in trouble for another reason.'

Common mass extinction theory

Until now, the common theory was that all dinosaurs, except the ancestors of birds, were wiped out at one time, perhaps by a huge , at the end of the Cretaceous period. Many dinosaur species such as Triceratops were wiped out abruptly around this time. However, this does not tell the full story.

Barrett and his team found that most species, such as those in the theropod group, like Baryonyx and T.rex, had already declined millions of years earlier.

This discovery was made while Barrett and his colleagues were studying how shows itself in the fossil record.

By studying species preserved as fossils in rocks, palaeontologists (fossil experts) can reveal what creatures lived in the past and major events that may have happened, such as mass extinctions.

However, the fossil record is not perfect. There are gaps and fossils can also be altered by geological processes. Erosion, burial and subduction (when plates slide under other plates) all help to destroy the fossil record.

Rock and diversity relationship

Barrett and his team's results uncovered a relationship between the amount of fossil-containing rock available and the pattern of species diversity. In general, the more rock available, the higher the diversity uncovered.

The diversity decline at the end of the Cretaceous was at a time in Earth's history when plenty of rock and fossils were preserved. So the high amount of available rock from this time should have shown a high diversity of dinosaurs if there was one. But it didn't.

'Our work shows for the first time that the number of different types of dinosaur was declining well before their final extinction, in spite of the fact the amount of rock available for preserving dinosaurs was at its peak.'

Barrett concludes, ‘The of dinosaurs continues to give us new surprises, even after 150 years of concentrated study’.

More information: Proceedings of the Royal Society, Biological Sciences

Provided by American Museum of Natural History (news : web)

Explore further: Dinosaur extinction controversy continues

Related Stories

Recommended for you

The hand and foot of Homo naledi

October 6, 2015

The second set of papers related to the remarkable discovery of Homo naledi, a new species of human relative, have been published in scientific journal, Nature Communications, on Tuesday, 6 October 2015.

Who you gonna trust? How power affects our faith in others

October 6, 2015

One of the ongoing themes of the current presidential campaign is that Americans are becoming increasingly distrustful of those who walk the corridors of power – Exhibit A being the Republican presidential primary, in which ...

The dark side of Nobel prizewinning research

October 4, 2015

Think of the Nobel prizes and you think of groundbreaking research bettering mankind, but the awards have also honoured some quite unhumanitarian inventions such as chemical weapons, DDT and lobotomies.

How much for that Nobel prize in the window?

October 3, 2015

No need to make peace in the Middle East, resolve one of science's great mysteries or pen a masterpiece: the easiest way to get yourself a Nobel prize may be to buy one.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (11) Apr 30, 2009
Dinosaurs could not have lived under our current gravity. The gravity in the past was much less. As the gravity increased they would obviously have declined.
3.5 / 5 (4) Apr 30, 2009
My troll sense is tingling.

(You'll notice, mysticshakra, that I gave you the benefit of the doubt against plain old idiocy)
1 / 5 (3) May 01, 2009
Of course we all know that the gravity of an object changes over time. :)
1 / 5 (7) May 01, 2009
Rethink your dogma guys, the issue has not been given much common sense. Too much is assumed.
1 / 5 (6) May 02, 2009
You are correct, gravity was lower during the Age of the Dinosaurs. Recent science headlines such as "Dinosaurs kept their heads down in a bid to stay alive..." , Pterosaurs could'nt fly, "Giant prehistoric geese the size of small planes" are but a few of the bits of circumstantial evidence that support this.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.