On demand doctor's appointments do not improve diabetes care

Mar 23, 2009

Same-day medical scheduling, also known as on demand scheduling, does not improve care of chronically ill individuals, according to a study of 4,060 adult patients with diabetes.

The Indiana University School of Medicine study is the first to report that individuals with who utilized on demand (or open access) scheduling, a system growing in popularity in which can call and receive same or next day follow-up medical appointments, had significantly poorer outcomes than diabetic patients who followed the traditional model and were scheduled for follow-up medical visits in advance.

The study, conducted in six open access clinics and six control clinics, appears in the March 2009 issue of the Journal of General Internal Medicine.

Traditionally, return check-ups are scheduled at the end of the previous visit. Patients select an appointment time months ahead without knowing their availability. With on demand scheduling, the patient is told to return within a specific time frame and is asked to call on the day of or the day before they would like to have their appointment.

"In what is to our knowledge the first evaluation of the impact of the system on diabetes processes and outcomes, we were surprised and concerned to find that with open access scheduling, patients did less well with their blood pressure. Control of blood pressure is probably the single most important medical intervention to improve survival and reduce health-care costs for those with diabetes," said Usha Subramanian, M.D., assistant professor of medicine and a Regenstrief Institute affiliated scientist, the first author of the new study.

"It appears that timely follow-up for chronic disease management may be compromised if patients are required to remember and schedule their appointment at a suggested interval as opposed to putting a previously scheduled appointment on the calendar and remembering to get to the doctor's office," said Dr. Subramanian, who is an internist.

The study found that there was no difference in ED visits or hospitalization rates between the open access and traditional scheduling groups

Previous small studies had found that open access scheduling improves patient satisfaction; but none of these studies looked at patients with chronic disease such as diabetes. Dr. Subramanian and colleagues are currently looking at patient satisfaction and no-show rates with open access scheduling among individuals with diabetes.

Source: Indiana University (news : web)

Explore further: Changing attitudes about sex

Related Stories

For psychiatric services, wait for the beep

Feb 25, 2009

Two-thirds of patients referred for psychiatric services following an emergency room visit are likely to reach only an answering machine when they call for help, compared to about 20 percent of patients calling medical clinics ...

Minority health-care clinics separate but unequal

Feb 09, 2009

A study published today in the Archives of Internal Medicine may shed new light on why minority Americans have poorer health outcomes from chronic conditions such as hypertension, heart disease and diabetes.

Study examines burden of diabetes on US hospitals

Jan 13, 2009

A new study published in Value in Health estimates the extent of hospital admissions for individuals with diabetes and its economic burden in the U.S. The results show that, during 2005, Americans with diabetes had 3.5 ti ...

Diabetics experience more complications following trauma

Jul 16, 2007

Individuals with diabetes appear to spend more days in the intensive care unit, use more ventilator support and have more complications during hospitalization for trauma than non-diabetics, according to a report in the July ...

Recommended for you

Changing attitudes about sex

2 hours ago

Acceptance of premarital sex is at an all-time high along with an acceptance of homosexuality, find researchers led by Jean M. Twenge from San Diego State University.

Hand washing vital in multi-bed hospital wards

2 hours ago

Hospital room designs make a significant difference to the likelihood of bugs being spread through person-to-person contact between medics and patients, according to University of Leeds research.

Time to bust the myths about seat belts

3 hours ago

When it comes to wearing seat belts, some motorists incorrectly think they are protected by the size of their vehicle, their seating position or where they are driving, said a Texas A&M AgriLife Extension ...

A psychological technique to help smokers quite tobacco

4 hours ago

An international research project led by scientists from the University of Granada has demonstrated that motivational interviewing can make smokers see tobacco as something disagreeable, thus helping them ...

User comments : 0

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.